Did Mitt want to "harvest" Detroit?
Ran across the New York Times op/ed from last February:
Delusions About the Detroit Bailout
By STEVEN RATTNER
Published: February 23, 2012
Mr. Romney may have the primary politics right though with a majority of Michigan voters supporting the rescue, he may want to pivot deftly before the general election in November. But on the substance hes dead wrong.
As a presidential aspirant, Mr. Romney evidently hasnt felt a need to be consistent or specific as to what should have been done to address the collapse of the auto industry starting in late 2008. But the gist is that the government should have stayed on the sidelines and allowed the companies to go through what he calls managed bankruptcies, financed by private capital.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/24/opinion/delusions-about-the-detroit-bailout.html?_r=0
If not "The Big Three," then all those industries that rely on Detroit. From the article:
Without government financing initiated by President George W. Bush in December 2008 the two companies would not have been able to pursue Chapter 11 reorganization. Instead they would have been forced to cease production, close their doors and lay off virtually all workers once their coffers ran dry.
Those shutdowns would have reverberated through the entire auto sector, causing innumerable suppliers almost immediately to stop operating too.
Despite the relative health of its balance sheet, even Ford would have been forced to close temporarily, because critical parts would have become unavailable. And service providers trucking companies, restaurants and more would have been severely affected.
More than a million jobs would have been lost, at least for a time. Michigan and the entire industrial Midwest would have been devastated.
Considering the recently-released video of him explaining how Bain Capital "harvested" companies, perhaps he was drooling over the prospects of Detroit in a financial meltdown.
He (or his partners) would have had a heyday selling assets and seizing pensions.