General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublican candidate calls for rebellious kids to be put to death
This isn't The Onion, y'all:
"Charlie Fuqua, the Republican candidate for the Arkansas House of Representatives who called for expelling Muslims from the United States in his book, also wrote in support for instituting the death penalty for "rebellious children."
In "God's Law," Fuqua's 2012 book, the candidate wrote that while parents love their children, a process could be set up to allow for the institution of the death penalty for "rebellious children," according to the Arkansas Times. Fuqua, who is anti-abortion, points out that the course of action involved in sentencing a child to death is described in the Bible and would involve judicial approval. While it is unlikely that many parents would seek to have their children killed by the government, Fuqua wrote, such power would serve as a way to stop rebellious children.
According to the Arkansas Times, Fuqua wrote:
The maintenance of civil order in society rests on the foundation of family discipline. Therefore, a child who disrespects his parents must be permanently removed from society in a way that gives an example to all other children of the importance of respect for parents. The death penalty for rebellious children is not something to be taken lightly. The guidelines for administering the death penalty to rebellious children are given in Deut 21:18-21:
This passage does not give parents blanket authority to kill their children. They must follow the proper procedure in order to have the death penalty executed against their children. I cannot think of one instance in the Scripture where parents had their child put to death. Why is this so? Other than the love Christ has for us, there is no greater love then [sic] that of a parent for their child. The last people who would want to see a child put to death would be the parents of the child. Even so, the Scrpture provides a safe guard to protect children from parents who would wrongly exercise the death penalty against them. Parents are required to bring their children to the gate of the city. The gate of the city was the place where the elders of the city met and made judicial pronouncements. In other words, the parents were required to take their children to a court of law and lay out their case before the proper judicial authority, and let the judicial authority determine if the child should be put to death. I know of many cases of rebellious children, however, I cannot think of one case where I believe that a parent had given up on their child to the point that they would have taken their child to a court of law and asked the court to rule that the child be put to death. Even though this procedure would rarely be used, if it were the law of land, it would give parents authority. Children would know that their parents had authority and it would be a tremendous incentive for children to give proper respect to their parents.
<snip>
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/08/charlie-fuqua-arkansas-candidate-death-penalty-rebellious-children_n_1948490.html
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Seriously
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Since the fundamentalist Christians are in America and can attain power, they are a far greater threat than the later.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)TBF
(32,062 posts)and religion is a method they've successfully used throughout history.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful." ~Seneca the Younger
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)The main purpose of religion, especially Christianity and Islam is to keep people under the control of the powerful.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)For the differently clued.
louis-t
(23,295 posts)Care Acutely
(1,370 posts)Low-information types need to know how rotten the root of that party is.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)this would basically be genocide. What kind of sociopath runs for office with these kinds of public views? Sickening.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)because that person is not in any way pro-life. Anti-abortion is all you could say there.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)Curtland1015
(4,404 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Just something to keep in mind; the Republican party endorses a candidate that says "rebellious" children should be murdered by the state.
porphyrian
(18,530 posts)Unfortunately, no one has an original word-for-word version of the Bible, since it wasn't written down for generations, only to be arbitrarily edited and censored by a succession of humans who claimed to know God's will, even though the Bible is supposedly the Word of God, so that doesn't make any sense. Further, I expect that Fuquad doesn't speak the language of the Bible at all, so he wouldn't understand any of it if he heard it. More likely, he's just another piece of shit fundamentalist with a personal political agenda that exemplifies hypcrisy. Am I right?
avebury
(10,952 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)First the women, now the children. I'm bettin that the authoritarian, conservative, old white men are last on this list, if they are even on it.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Wackadoo!
Whiskeytide
(4,461 posts)... It is beyond messed up. Is there actually a church in this country that abides this reasoning? That my teenager will get in line if he knows I have the right to petition the State for his execution??? Has to be a bad joke.
And more importantly, what voting demographic hears someone say this and thinks "I would like to see that man in charge of things"?
Tom Rinaldo
(22,913 posts)This will be included as a platform plank by the 2016 National Republican Party.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Nothing. They have all out-sourced their thinking and couldn't reason their way out of a paper sack.