General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUsing Gallup's Own Numbers Obama Was Up 59% -41% In Sunday's Subsample
It was 47% -47% with samples from 10/4, 10/5 and 10/6:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/157907/romney-narrows-vote-gap-historic-debate-win.aspx
It was 50%-45% with samples from 10/4, 10/5. 10/6, and 10/7:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/election.aspx
For Obama to go from a 47% -47% tie on the third day of a sample to a 50%-45% lead on the fourth days of a sample the sample days have to look essentially like this:
It would have been
47-47 10/4
47-47 10/5
47-47 10/6
59-41 10/7
mzmolly
(50,992 posts)Seems like quite a swing, in a single day? Especially without a major scandal or???
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)They release seven day samples. All of a sudden they decided to release a three day sample that showed the race tied. However their seven day sample shows a 50% -45% Obama lead. I decided to do a four day sample, using Gallup's own numbers. To get to 50% -45% in a four day sample where they were tied 47%-47% after three days Obama would have to won the fourth day 59%-41%.
mzmolly
(50,992 posts)Thanks.
elleng
(130,914 posts)is misunderstanding/misinterpreting/misreading the Gallup numbers, not actually noticing the days corresponding to the numbers? And that MSNBC among others should be so informed?
(Trying to understand.)
BumRushDaShow
(129,027 posts)elleng
(130,914 posts)NOW for the Headlines!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts).
nsd
(2,406 posts)It includes not just 10/4 - 10/7, but also 10/1 - 10/3.
ETA: We don't know what the 10/4 - 10/7 average was.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Got This From Intrade- Could Obama Have Been Up 56% -42% In Sunday's One Day Gallup Sample?
Last edited Mon Oct 8, 2012, 05:58 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
I'm surprised nobody posted this:
From Gallup's Data, the split was 47/47 post debate and 50/45 pre-debate
So the split looks like:
9/30: 50/45
10/1: 50/45
10/2: 50/45
10/3: 50/45
10/4: 47/47
10/5: 47/47
10/6: 47/47
This would give you an average of 49/46, as it was before today's numbers.
Now we have:
10/1: 50/45
10/2: 50/45
10/3: 50/45
10/4: 47/47
10/5: 47/47
10/6: 47/47
10/7: ? / ?
For the rolling average of 50/45 that was posted today, today's data must be much more heavily favorable towards Obama to make the numbers work. 56/42 is most Romney-favorable number that makes this work
nsd
(2,406 posts)We don't know that to be true. All we know is that yesterday (10/7) was better than last Sunday (9/30).
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts).
nsd
(2,406 posts)It doesn't tell us what happened on Sunday, 9/30 which is the crucial thing.
central scrutinizer
(11,648 posts)Are your numbers what you assume each day's individual polls were?
If so, then I doubt that each of those seven days had the same results. I would expect variation due to sampling variability and it might be that 9/30 was a relatively good day for Rmoney and when that fell off the seven day calculation it would bump up the rolling average. Which would mean that Sunday was a good day for Obama, but not 56/42 good. We should know a lot more in a couple more days when the Thursday (day after debate) poll falls off the seven day average.
cojoel
(957 posts)But I can't find if that is what Gallup uses, of if they use a moving average that is weighted, or modified, or some other approach.
B2G
(9,766 posts)And it went to 47-47 AFTER the debate?
Am I not reading this correctly?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Gallup then released a seven day tracker that included Sunday that showed the pres with a huge lead.
Conclusion-The president had a huge Sunday.
B2G
(9,766 posts)I really don't get some of these wild swings. And I wish more of these polls would release the demographics about who responded.
BumRushDaShow
(129,027 posts)the lower deficit (down by $200,000,000,000) and other positive economic news that was conveniently left out of the polling and "tie" narrative.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)That being said, just willy nilly taking three days out of that sample which is what Gallup did with their shock poll strikes me as irresponsible.
BumRushDaShow
(129,027 posts)against all other indicators, was an even WORSE decision. And the sad thing is that so many on DU just piled on.
As they say - "There are lies, damn lies, and statistics".
Early this morning Gallup released 3-day averages for before and after the debate. These showed 50-45 and 47-47 respectively.
At 1 pm EST, Gallup released a 7-day average showing 50-45.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)elleng
(130,914 posts)woolldog
(8,791 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Gallup has stated they were tied at 47% on 47% 10/4, 10/5, and 10/6. To be at 50%-45% at the end of a tracking poll that began 10/1 , the data suggests Obama beat Romney in yesterday's sample by fourteen points or more.
woolldog
(8,791 posts)but how do you know what the 3 day average was for the 3 days before the debate?
We know the 3 day average after the debate = 47
We know the 4 day average for 3 days before debate + Sunday = 52.3
You're assuming what the numbers are for the first 3 days. Just because the average on the eve of the debate was 49 or 50, doesn't mean the average for the 3 days leading up to the debate was 49 or 50.
Right? Am I missing something?
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Having said that, Obama's Sunday number could be anywhere from 54-61.