General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMy answer to ALL of you who want secession in some form. (And my hair is on fire!)
There was a war fought to keep the country together.
And why on Earth do you want to just ignore the many people who don't deserve such a fate?
And what about those western states and others that are bright red? Giving them a pass? Some of them are home to some of the most virulent militias ever.
Look in your own damn back yard and turn over some rocks. You might be unpleasantly surprised what you find? As I remember, Boston had a time integrating their schools.
In addition, you are hearing the loudest and most ignorant voices here. They are frantic and getting louder because they can read the tea leaves. They are doing everything in their power to entrench themselves. It would be easier to get rid of chiggers all over your body.
So, meh to you, that book, and everyone who wants us gone. We ain't going anywhere. Help those of us who are working in horrible conditions to move forward. I didn't live through the awful '60s and the hard won rights for people in these states to watch everyone shrug and say let them go.
MLK would be ashamed of everyone of you! Find a book of his speeches and writings and try to catch a clue. Read his 'Letter From The Birmingham Jail!' Bobby Kennedy would give a 'Come To Jesus' sermon that would never be forgotten to all who want secession and call themselves progressives or whatever.
Medgar Evers
Schwerner, Chaney, and Goodman
Emmitt Till
And remember these people too. Explain to their relatives why you want us gone.
The 40 Who Fell in the Turbulence Of the U.S. Battles for Civil Rights
A civil rights memorial to be dedicated Sunday includes the names of the 40 people killed in the movement. The list, in chronological sequence, gives the date and circumstances of the person's death as described on the memorial. LEE, the Rev. George, killed May 7, 1955, for leading a voter registration drive in Belzoni, Miss. SMITH, Lamar, 63 years old, slain Aug. 13, 1955, for organizing black voters in Brookhaven, Miss. TILL, Emmett Louis, 14, slain Aug. 28, 1955, for speaking to a white woman in Money, Miss. REESE, John Earl, 16, slain Oct. 22, 1955, by nightriders opposed to black school improvements in Mayflower, Tex. EDWARDS, Willie Jr., killed Jan. 23, 1957, by the Ku Klux Klan in Montgomery, Ala. PARKER, Mack Charles, 23, taken from a jail and lynched April 25, 1959, in Poplarville, Miss. LEE, Herbert, 50, voter registration worker, killed Sept. 25, 1961, by a white legislator in Liberty, Miss. DUCKSWORTH, Roman Jr., taken from bus and killed April 9, 1962, by the police in Taylorsville, Miss. GUIHARD, Paul, a European reporter, killed Sept. 30, 1962, in a riot at University of Mississippi in Oxford, Miss. MOORE, William Lewis, slain April 23, 1963, in a one-man march against segregation in Attalla, Ala. EVERS, Medgar, 28, civil rights leader, assassinated June 12, 1963, in Jackson, Miss. COLLINS, Addie Mae, 14, killed Sept. 15, 1963, in the bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Ala. MCNAIR, Denise, 11, killed Sept. 15, 1963, in the Birmingham church bombing. ROBERTSON, Carole, 14, killed Sept. 15, 1963, in the church bombing. WESLEY, Cynthia, 14, killed Sept. 15, 1963, in the church bombing. WARE, Virgil Lamar, 13, killed Sept. 15, 1963, in a wave of racist violence in Birmingham, Ala. ALLEN, Louis, witness to the killing of a civil rights worker, assassinated Jan. 31, 1964, in Liberty, Miss. KLUNDER, the Rev. Bruce, killed April 7, 1964, protesting the construction of a segregated school in Cleveland. DEE, Henry Hezekiah, 19, killed May 2, 1964, by the Klan in Meadville, Miss. MOORE, Charles Eddie, 20, killed May 2, 1964, by the Klan in Meadville, Miss. CHANEY, James, 21, civil rights worker, abducted and slain June 21, 1964, by the Klan in Philadelphia, Miss. GOODMAN, Andrew, civil rights worker, abducted and slain June 21, 1964, by the Klan in Philadelphia, Miss. SCHWERNER, Michael, 24, rights worker, abducted and slain June 21, 1964, by the Klan in Philadelphia, Miss. PENN, Lemuel, 48, killed July 11, 1964, by the Klan while driving through Colbert, Ga. JACKSON, Jimmie Lee, civil rights marcher, killed Feb. 26, 1965, by a state trooper in Marion, Ala. REEB, the Rev. James, march volunteer, beaten to death on March 11, 1965 in Selma, Ala. LIUZZO, Viola Gregg, 39, killed March 25, 1965, by the Ku Klux Klan while transporting marchers on a highway near Selma, Ala. MOORE, Oneal, 34, black deputy, killed June 2, 1965, by nightriders in Varnado, La. BREWSTER, Willie Wallace, 38, killed July 18, 1965, by nightriders in Anniston, Ala. DANIELS, Jonathan, 26, seminary student, killed Aug. 20, 1965, by a part-time deputy in Hayneville, Ala. YOUNGE, Samuel Jr., student civil rights worker, killed Jan. 3, 1966, in a dispute over a whites-only restroom in Tuskegee, Ala. DAHMER, Vernon, black community leader, killed Jan. 10, 1966, in a Klan bombing in Hattiesburg, Miss. WHITE, Ben Chester, 67, killed June 10, 1966, by the Klan in Natchez, Miss. TRIGGS, Clarence, slain July 30, 1966, by nightriders in Bogalusa, La. JACKSON, Wharlest, 37, civil rights leader, killed Feb. 27, 1967, after promotion to ''white'' job in Natchez, Miss. BROWN, Benjamin, 22, civil rights worker, killed May 12, 1967, when the police fired on protesters in Jackson, Miss. HAMMOND, Samuel Jr., 18, killed Feb. 8, 1968, when highway patrolmen fired on protesters in Orangeburg, S.C. MIDDLETON, Delano, 17, killed Feb. 8, 1968, in the Orangeburg shootings. SMITH, Henry, student killed Feb. 8, 1968, in the Orangeburg shootings. KING, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther Jr., 39, assassinated April 4, 1968 in Memphis.
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/11/04/us/the-40-who-fell-in-the-turbulence-of-the-us-battles-for-civil-rights.html
MEH!!!!!!!!!!!
djean111
(14,255 posts)To those who honestly think the southern states should secede - will I get to move somewhere else first? And that is a tough choice right there - I don't know as I want to live around people who condemn people geographically. Or by age or gender or ethnicity.
Too broad a brush = too narrow a mind. Not to mention very off-putting.
Already, I stop reading when I encounter "all old people" or "What's wrong with Floridians?" because those are stupid premises. As a older Floridian, reading that stuff is downright weird. And pointless.
We will encourage those Dixie dwellers to emigrate to the United States, and they will have steady employment as we build a giant border wall surrounded by a moat filled with burning gasoline and asbestos alligators. Others can find steady jobs laying the mine fields and manning the machine gun turrets that will be placed at 50 foot intervals. We need to get started quickly because after about 5 years of "chris-chun limited guvermint freemarkits," our confederate friends will be attempting to enter the United States illegally.
Here's a preview of the plans:
Please keep this in mind the next time you or the OP would like to write another post about this.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)But we stand a much better chance fighting the corporations if we weren't carrying around all that right to work for less ballast down south. In any event my "that's a joke, son" message still applies to any mention of secession. Our real no joke hope is the continued growth of the minority populations in Texas. If Texas ever goes blue, that will force a reset for the political system in this country, much like the CRA of 1964.
I understand the sensitivity of our southern librul friends, but given the current state of affairs, I think it's reasonable for you to expect a good deal of South bashing, because there isn't any question that (in general) the South has been an anchor preventing the rest of the country from moving forward for a very long time.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)My Wife & I moved from a Big Blue Northern City
to a Dark Red Rural part of The South.
The South is BEAUTIFUL,
and belongs to all of us.
We aren't going back.
Good Luck with you plans for Ethnic Cleansing.
We are going to stay here and turn The South Blue one vote at a time.
HankyDub
(246 posts)hope you enjoyed it as much as I did.
ncgrits
(916 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)pipoman
(16,038 posts)I'm trying to place the context of your meh, however..?
Are_grits_groceries
(17,111 posts)is a general summation of my feelings to all those who advocate secession and their ideas. It isn't the general 'so what' meh.
I use it in lieu of all the words that are not fit for this forum.
Whiskeytide
(4,461 posts)... Really?
Are_grits_groceries
(17,111 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)Are_grits_groceries
(17,111 posts)that periodically appear on DU. The word secession may not be uttered, but the wish for red states to be gone is there.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)seems it's either an idiot or a joke.
(I admit I have myself once or twice wondered out loud just why Lincoln considered union so important to get a snicker or two, but never pushed the point.)
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)the idea that the 'Union' represented a sharp break from the monarchic and feudal traditions of Europe and a grand experiment in self-government. That was why Lincoln sought to preserve the Union.
In one of his annual addresses to Congress (1862), Lincoln referred to the U.S. as the 'last, best hope of earth':
"We know how to save the Union. The world knows we do know how to save it. We -- even we here -- hold the power, and bear the responsibility. In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom to the free -- honorable alike in what we give, and what we preserve. We shall nobly save, or meanly lose, the last best hope of earth . . . . "
http://showcase.netins.net/web/creative/lincoln/speeches/congress.htm
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)just walk away, so could Massachussetts and the whole country goes blooey.
There are times, however, when I just can't avoid being snarky.
.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)"We should have just let the South go, because who needs it?"
But then I remember Lincoln and his words and that wipes the smile off my face.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)the constant harping of some southern states (Texas, South Carlina) who seem to think that threatening to secede is a viable political position?
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)To stay in the South as a person that is completely committed to living in the South since I have lived here all of my life, than to be a transplant that bitches about being in the South but does nothing to leave it OR IMPROVE IT!
Take it for what it is worth, my friend. The South isn't Brooklyn, and southerners don't take it kindly when you insult the place where you are currently living, and enjoying the fruits of living. You are much free-er to move to Brooklyn than I am to wave a magic wand and make everyone in the South an open-minded Democrat.
It takes time to get through to people.
Sirveri
(4,517 posts)But not for the South. I live in CA, I want us to secede, or at least seriously threaten it.
LiberalLoner
(9,761 posts)From a poster who comes from a state with some of those militias and racist people (Montana.) Sometimes I feel despair about the bad news from my state and then I try to remember all the good people in my home state who are fighting the good fight!
barbtries
(28,795 posts)has some of those militias, and i will guarantee that there are racists in every state.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)the position against secession presented here, one reason one might contemplate alternatives to fighting to keep this country together is so that list won't grow longer. Why fight people who are stuck on stupid when maybe you can more peaceably secede or construct an artificial island in the Pacific ocean? There are plenty of nations (and people) stuck on stupid. Why risk your life for them when you can form a separate nation with people who share your political ideals? Seems much easier to walk away from idiots than to convince or force them to think like you. Don't psychologists teach us to do that with toxic friends?
Are_grits_groceries
(17,111 posts)You won't find harmony no matter what you do or where you go. At some point, you will have to take a stand unless human nature changes.
Better to take a stand here and fight for what I believe in. It is my HOME too and a bunch of peckerwoods who are out in the open or in some type of accepted disguise will not run me out.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)What am I, Lex Luther? Lol.
But I do find harmony. Among my fellow Democrats, Liberals and Progressives.
Are_grits_groceries
(17,111 posts)It's not a word found only in comic books.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)I admit that I am one of those blue state people that would gladly wash my hands of most of the south and a lot of the midwest. The three southern states that I would take a chance on are Florida, North Carolina and Kentucky. The rest, including West Virginia, can go where-ever they want, I would gladly build a wall to keep their citizens out of our territory.
Why do I take such a mean spirited state of mind? Pounding frustration. You wrote of all the people that lost their lives fighting for basic human rights. The one mindset those people had was that things would get better because of their sacrifice. When I look southward from my blue state, I don't see things getting better anymore. What I see are embarrassingly ignorant people being sent out of the south to the US House and Senate. What I see is something like 85% of southern Whites voting for those cretins. Those southern Whites show no intention of changing their minds or behavior, why in the fuck should I allow their point of view to affect the quality of my life? What will change my mind? Seeing the few sane Whites in the deep south forming coalitions with Blacks, Asians, and Hispanics to form a working majority that sends fucking intelligent people to the US House and Senate, as well as take over state branches of government, until that happens I will continue to view the south as an ass boil that needs to be eliminated.
I know you won't agree. Maybe if you understood the frustrations of the other side and why those people feel that way, it would be possible to put heads together and think of a way forward instead of fighting.
Are_grits_groceries
(17,111 posts)Good lawd! You ought to live here. There is a New Dem party and a Progressive party working on things. That's because the regular party is made up of a bunch of yahoos only interested in keeping what little influence they have to themselves. I loathe them.
As I have said, the GOP mooks can see the writing on the wall as more people move in who are going to want change. It scares all of them to death. We will need a bunker buster to get them out, but we will.
A cousin of mine who I would swear was a Republican quit that party. He was fed up with lying. My 85 year old aunt got so pissed, for the first time in her life she volunteered to work for Dem candidates.
If you think a majority of people are going to see the light and suddenly do a 180, it ain't going to happen. It takes tenacity and hard work. As far as taking over state governments, it's not that easy. First we have to oust the Dem deadwood. That will be a fight so we are trying an end run.
I do understand your frustrations as much as I can. I don't understand why everyone is ready to leave so many decent people in the lurch.
At one point in 2008, Obama said he was going to open an office with smaller offices here. I was so excited. There were people I know of all races ready to help. It would have energized the Dems and hopefully started something. It would have empowered people to work left out by everybody. That would have helped the end run. Then nobody came. I know it seemed from the outside as throwing away money. From the inside, it could have been an answer to prayers.
No, I don't blame him for our problems. It did feel like a punch in the gut though.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)Democratic Presidents like Clinton and Obama should vacation regularly in the south, may be during the winter or fall. But they go to places like California and the Vineyard. Democratic vacation choices just reinforce the isolation that some southerners feel. Opening field offices is a good idea to, even if there is no chance, those offices are a beach-head to start bringing in like minds and the convertible, in the long run, those offices would prove invaluable.
Look, realistically, people with my point of view about the south aren't going to get what they want. We are stuck with each other. What I want to see is more national level fight coming out of the south from good minded southern people like you and many other DU posters. Send people to the Congress that have intelligence and will make your region proud. There are enough good Whites, Blacks, Hispanics and Asians to form a coalition of well intentioned winners, get it done. Although the democratic party in the south is weak and you prefer other means, that party does have numbers, work with it until the day comes when you can take it over and reform it.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)and indeed every nation ibn the world that has had serious divisions. As far as why, because if the Chinese, Indians, Brazilians and Russians manage to stay together, they will be in a position to flog us like sled dogs,unity tends to keep other people from messing with you.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)when you can get it. But there is no genuine unity between conservatives and liberals. It's a genuine division. And trying to put a band aid on genuine divisions don't make us safer. They make us prone to lashing out and violence against each other. Forcing together two sides that are incompatible is bad in a relationship and its bad news in a nation.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)stripes met on a bridge in the city and left their political affiliations behind to discuss the problems of the nation, the state, and locally. It was solution oriented and not focused on ideology. Rather than insisting that divisions be reinforced, why not do as these folks did and learn to talk to one another to problem solve. I reject your cynical insistence that we are somehow destined to forever be at war with one another. We live in communities and in those communities we can start building on shoring the foundation of the nation rather than trying to forever dress the marble in bas relief.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)It is a solution.
How can you expect to be an advocate of dialogue when label someone as "cynical" who is presenting their idea of a solution?
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)of solving problems together. Should your solution be followed, dialogue is precluded before it could start.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)when you run up against evangelical Christians and other conservatives with real differences of opinion and solutions contradictory to yours.
I wish you genuine good luck....but I'm skeptical it can work.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)We do not have the division on community issues that you seem to think must exist just because. We sit in community meetings and discuss the problems that affect us all as a village and we arrive at solutions. We leave religion at the door. As for social issues, it is understood that our beliefs should not affect each others' choices. People here are very respectful of one another and we take care of one another. It can be done. Why do you think Iowa has never totally tipped over into the craziness of Teabagger America? Sure we have pockets of them, but mostly you'll find community-minded people who know that charity begins at home.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)But I was responding to the premise of this thread that implied all conservatives and liberals could get along and find mutually acceptable solutions. That can't be done. What can be done, and which is much more peaceful, is both go their separate ways that way the quality of people's lives isn't disturbed by the endless political bickering. And when some from one side are ready to talk with the other, they can. But the animosity and hostility over which direction the country should go would be, largely, put to rest with a, if you will, two state solution.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)manage that quite well.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)I do however think that our country is far to big to have an effective federal government.
oldhippie
(3,249 posts)I had always learned that a "civil war" was two or more factions fighting for control of the same government. A faction fighting to secede from a (supposedly voluntary) association was not technically a "civil war" but something else.
Anyone know if this is true and what would be the proper terminology?
those are terms generally left to the history books
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)Union adherents (myself included--see my comments upthread) call it "The Civil War."
oldhippie
(3,249 posts).... and I was born and raised in yankeeland (Upstate NY.)
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)a 'War of Northern Aggression.'
And don't forget who fired on Fort Sumter when you're trotting out the 'aggression' label.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts).....didn't scapegoat it while stealing from it.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)The people needed to fix the problem are the very ones benefiting from it.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)"Some Democrats have responded to the election by reaffirming their belief in government's ability to solve our problems."
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tax-cuts-dadt-start-food-safety-productive-lame/story?id=12458453#.UHMkPlYrqO1
The only time I've ever seen a political party promise to solve nothing.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Actually, they might better be labeled robbers
arendt
(5,078 posts)(Sorry, this is rambling and unfocussed. Dashed off in five minutes on my way out the door to work.)
This country was founded by people who had the carnage of religious wars just behind them, who wanted a nation free from religious strife. (Among other things.)
The fundamentalists are explicitly against the Enlightenment. They piss on our government and on education. And the fundamentalists are in every state, in every city - shoving their propaganda down everyone's throat. And that propaganda is as old as patriarchy: women are property, the other (minorities, glbts) are not even human, don't think, just obey.
So, I agree with you that there won't be secession. But there will be violence. Brutal, friend on friend violence. Up close and personal violence. The kind that always ensues in stupid, irrational religious fights.
The fundies have already been going on random murder sprees (like the guy in California who intended to shoot up the Tides Institute).
But, the worst thing about the fundies is that they WANT to be peasants and worship kings; and the corporations love this, so they support this authoritarian, anti-science, pseudo-Christian crapola, even as they use science (computers) to spy on everyone and enslave us.
I consider states that have passed medieval religious laws (Kansas comes to mind) to have been captured by anti-Constitution seditionists. The last time we had sedition on such a large and organized scale, we had a Civil War. Before that, the Revolutionary War had an overtone of religion (high church Anglican Tories, and low church Americans). The big fights in this country have always been about religion.
If you think that saying "no secession" is going to prevent massive bloodshed when the corporate takeover of America is completed and the fundies are put in as the local tyrant to suppress dissent and collect the taxes for the multinationals, you are whistling past a graveyard waiting to be filled.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)The Red States have made it clear that they want to live in a 3rd-world sewer. They're afraid of the whole country turning into San Francisco. Well, let them have their Wild West and turn it into one big Mississippi. We'll turn our part into one big SF/NY. Everyone will be happy.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)have a difficult time scrubbing from my mind
Question: where would the Native Americans fit in???
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)...want to have that same government behave as an empire and kick ass all over the world.
SaveAmerica
(5,342 posts)wanted to leave this joint. I'm southern but have nothing in common with Republicans or right-wingers and definitely not anywhere near like anyone in the Tea Party. I've witnessed their hate and anger and the way they are determined to cause people and the country harm.
I've wanted to move to a bigger city in the south with like-minded, non-hateful, people but stayed so I could make a difference in a red area (and that decision was good, check out NC 2008). Lately I've wanted to leave the south completely because the stupid and hate has ramped up with permission from people in the 'news' and the haters holding each other up as valid. Then I ask myself, do I want to give up so much treasure that is the south to those haters? Can you imagine what this place would be like if we gave it up to people who have no idea what their actions can do to the natural beauty and resources here?
THIS IS MY SOUTH TOO!
We are good the way we are and we have to acknowledge that people are either negative or positive, that's how we're made up. We have places in the US that are majority Republican with a dot of Dems and places that are majority Dem with scattered Republican. At this time in history the Tea Party haters feel that they can be vocal, we have to show that they can't and stand up to their lies to get them back to 'normal hate levels'.
In the United States there are always going to be haters and there are always going to be lovers, at the end of the day it comes down to how we accept and work with each other.
Javaman
(62,530 posts)davidthegnome
(2,983 posts)I just wish we could give members of the GOP and the tea party their own planet somewhere. Maybe offer free transportation... free land on the new planet as an incentive. Forty acres and a mule!
bvar22
(39,909 posts).....to help fight this battle,we could make some more progress.
We did, under Dean's 50 State Strategy.
davidthegnome
(2,983 posts)The 50 State Strategy was brilliant and inspired. Not sure why the heck they decided to scrap it... what a damn shame.
I'm with you on allocating funds to the Southern States to help win this struggle. I just don't know how we can convince the powers that be that it's a good idea. Perhaps point to Dean's strategy as an example... I don't know.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)I am a Texan!
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)it's not your state, it's the Good ol boy network .
kentauros
(29,414 posts)too many DUers don't see that distinction. They are more than ready and willing to toss all the good out with the bad. Some say we can "just move" out of our home (I define that as my shelter as well as my region.) I seriously doubt they would be all that willing to allow tens of millions of people moving into their state. More like we'd be "asked" to move to some other state so they wouldn't be inconvenienced by the huge influx of new people (and opinions that aren't quite as "blue" as their own.)
It's a lot of broad-brushing and really doesn't belong here on DU.
judesedit
(4,438 posts)davidthegnome
(2,983 posts)Put your head in the sink quick! Turn the water on! Uhm, maybe jump in a lake or bath-tub. That kinda things get out of control real quick, you know.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Since 2008 the racism in this country along with Anti-liberalism is at an all time high, Jimmy Carter addressed the problem at length .
porphyrian
(18,530 posts)First, I'm not a secessionist. I think the idea is primative and stupid. I just like to work torwards solutions.
Our country was founded in violent revolution because rich white landowners didn't want to pay taxes to their king. Despite this, good things came from it, along with the bad, and it took another century or so before we had our Civil War. This time, the violent revolution was largely due to State vs. Federal power, since some people believed they should have the right to enslave and own other people and they had built their entire economy on this belief. The Civil Rights movement was probably the next national revolution, which ended up being violent, despite some attempts to avoid it.
Now, here we are. There are (at least) two Americas, each believing it is patriotic and that the other side needs to come around to its ways or get out. In the eyes of many, there is no real bipartisanship on a national level, there is only failure or surrender to the opponent. Apocalyptic cults are rampant. Truth is the victim of profit. The world appears to be dying at our own hands and nothing affective appears to be being done about it. People are desperate and losing hope.
What is different this time? How do we avoid another violent revolution? What, other than a common enemy, can unite America (since a common enemy likely means more war)?
bvar22
(39,909 posts)The Civil War was fought for THIS reason,
and THIS reason only:
A handful of RICH Mother Fuckers and a small crowd of Wannabe Rich Mother Fuckers (Sociopaths) believed that the World and everyone in it existed to serve THEM and THEM alone.
The current strife in the USA and The World is being caused and aggravated by the exact same reason,
North, South, East, or West.
When the Working Class & The Poor realize WE have MORE in common with each other
than we have in common with the Elite 1% and their Paid Employees in Washington,
THEN we can have "change".
Our neighbors in Latin America have shown us the way.
VIVA Democracy!
porphyrian
(18,530 posts)The problem is that the difference in viewpoint of these parties is so vast and mutually hostile. How do we unite without violence or something ridiculous like secession?
I am saying that the Working Class and The Poor should unite against ALL those who advance
the agenda of the RICH (Corporate Owners) at the expense of LABOR and The Poor,
whether they be Republican OR Democrat.
IF the Democratic Party is smart, they will get out in front and lead the movement,
but that will require a major revival and return to the Working Class roots for the party of FDR and LBJ.
If they are too comfortable with their 1% benefits and lifestyles,
they should be left behind.
No more Wall Street before Main Street...EVER AGAIN.
There is a gulf between the two parties on some issues,
but on other critical issues, they both serve the same master.
Show me this vast difference in viewpoint when it comes to "Free Trade",
the War on Drugs, insourcing/outsourcing, or using our military to make the World safe for the IMF, Global Banks, and Resource Extraction Corporations.
Show me the hostile divide when it comes to Monsanto, "Too Big to Fail" Corporations, Private Prisons, For Profit Health Care, and the emerging TRUE Democracies in Latin America.
porphyrian
(18,530 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)I give four answers: China, Russia, India and Brazil. Yes, these nations have problems based on their many ethinic groups, but they have also gotten stronger, namely because they realize that without national unity, the Europeans and their by products (namely we Yanks) would still treat them like thrid world countries. Now, they are in a position to start swinging the bat around, because they realize that when you can act united, you prevent people from f__king with you.
Now, we all know the CSA will be opened up as a corporate feeding trough. That is not merely bad for the Southerners, but also bad for us, as those Union folks in California and New York will have to compete against literal slave labor. For those who say "Oh they would never bring it back",allow me to share an ancedote. When I went to the "Laura" planatation in Louisiana, they explained how many Blacks were kept in the same slave cabins, and used a line that said since they were charged for food and board, they owed the owner...generation after generation was kept in the same slave area as their great great grandparents. They even showed the cabin of the most famous resident, a man named Antoine "Fats" Domino. They were also quick to point out that this system was replaced by Mexican migrant work...as if this was progress, and noted that those workers still lived in the same damn cabins, even though they had running water now. Of course, while the New Yorkers and Californians will sneer at this while drinking their Brazilian orange juice, they will gleefully skip over the fact that they let this happen, until of course, their jobs get outsourced to the new Chinese built plant in Tennessee. And let us not even look at the way the CSA will make mischief in Latin America, and ignore still the fact that the Latinos are not going to buy this excuse that "oh, we Yankeees did not do it, it was those Dixie people" when they know full well we had the means to stop them, and failed.
Let us also write out the fact that the red/blue debate is really a rural/city debate. Most cities in Dixie are as blue as New York. While ther rural north spews out the Chris Christies and Michelle Bachmanns. Even a place like Texas manages to make the likes of Molly Ivins, Kris Kristofferson and Jim Hightower. Yeah, I bring up that point often, because I keep hearing some"liberals" on here ignore that fact, despite the fact that the three Imentioned have some of the hardest, stiffest left hooks around. I will take these three over a milquetoast like Maureen Dowd any day.
bamacrat
(3,867 posts)They are all about their secession. The fact that always stumps these dbags is when you ask them who will pay for the roads and bridges and clean water and food and education. They always say private business...there are toll roads all across TX... They have no state income tax, which is nice and could probably last a year as the United State of Texas but after that unemployment would skyrocket and the cost of everything would go through the roof. Secession is stupid. Especially since there isn't a fundamental difference between the states like there was 150 years ago.
Drale
(7,932 posts)In April of 1860 the US army had 15,000 men spread across the continent. Today was have somewhere around 800,000 plus who knows how many national guardsmen. The second any "Militia" group came up against an A1 Abrams Tank they would shit their pants and give up. There would be very little blood shed and the "war" would last about 2 days. Its just alot of saber rattling and big talk from men with the mindset of little boys who's mother told them no.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)Afghanistan (nor did their predecessors in Vietnam). Irregular forces can often fight regular, mechanized forces to a stalemate or even (Dien Bien Phu) outright defeat and surrender.
That said, I do agree with you about today's species of (pseudo-) southern secessionists as pants-crapping whiners.
N.B. In 1861, many on both sides predicted the war would last no more than 90 days. Sherman was one of the few who, having lived and worked in the ante-bellum South, understood the war would be long and bloody. He was hospitalized briefly for depression at the beginning of the war because of it, IIRC.
Drale
(7,932 posts)Last edited Mon Oct 8, 2012, 01:03 PM - Edit history (1)
were being supplied the heavy weapons that they needed to fight a mechanized force though. The militia's in the south don't have such weapons and if they do they have a very small number with no way to replace them once they succeed and run out. You are correct that most people believed that the Civil War would be a 90 day war but when the South seceded all of their Generals where West Point trained and some of the best in the Union Army, I highly doubt anyone high up in the Army would go over to the succeeding states this time.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)Southern states to start organizing their state militias ahead of formal secession. So the pro-Southern generals had something of a structure into which to step when secesssion occurred.
Neil Sheehan persuasively documents that the National Liberation Front was mostly armed (per-1965) through weapons it captured from puppet forces or purchased from corrupt supply officials in the puppet regime. I've often wondered where the irregulars in Iraq and Afghanistan got their weapons. I suspect the Afghan and Iraqi resistance movements have likewise armed themselves through black market acquisitions and captures from puppet forces. But that is merely a suspicion on my part.
Since Mississippi receives $2.47 in federal funds for every $1 it pays in taxes and Alabama receives $2.03 in federal funds for every $1 it recieves, I highly doubt we'll see any secessionist movement.
Small correction: think you mean "Iraq" and not "Iran"
SQUEE
(1,315 posts)That quite a few of the actual door kickers in the military tend to lean right and even FAR right, I am not talking your PAC clerks. Mechanics and other assorted REMFs and fobbits.
I noticed in my time in the Infantry, that
1 as a Red, I was quite alone being Left of center at all much lest a Socialist.. I kept my mouth shut.
2 the preponderance of my brother grunts, tread heads and cannon cockers came from south of the Mason Dixon. The tip of the spear is forged in Dixie was my CO in Koreas motto. He was an alum of VMI then the Point.
And as me and a few others here have mentioned, the Klan, and various 88 groups have been getting training for free from the military for decades. I have known more than a dozen Rangers and even an SF candidate or two that were there for the training and experience, to take back and disseminate to their racist cohorts.
Tanks are great in tank battles, urban ops? Not so much. I and many others here could train a group of men to stop one most riki-tik. The insurgent always has the advantage in that he can decide when to engage, and if its on home turf..
Please dont sell these fools short on being crazy brave or stupid tough.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"Secessionists" are number three on my "Bless Your Little Heart-- You Didn't Get Enough Hugs As A Child" list, sandwiched between Birthers (#4) and Holocaust Deniers (#2).