General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOn CNN - Robme WANTED Obama to bring up the 47%
He's released some stupid video saying how "wrong" he was about that comment, and his campaign stated that he wanted Obama to bring it up during the debate so he could "make it right" BUT HE DIDNT!!!!!!!!!!
unblock
(52,309 posts)that comes to mind. they think things through.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)Especially considering there is new video with Ryan saying almost the same thing. "You are all lazy rotten takers. Me with my entire career being on the government payroll, I'm a maker."
So what if Romney goes on Faux and tries to disown it? That video speaks for itself. It is not going away. It is obvious to anybody who watches it that is the REAL Mitt Romney. So get used to it Mitt. You own that one. Go ahead and bring it up at the next debate. It won't make any difference.
After all, look at what has happened. He's been trying to explain that away since it came out. It isn't going away.
By the way, out of principle, I didn't watch the interview on Faux. Somebody tell me. Did he apologize to the people he insulted? I know he said "I'm a bad boy." But did he apologize? Did he say anything like "I know I was completely wrong in everything I said that night. I understand how offensive that is to so many people. I apologize to everyone I hurt with my words. I am so sorry and I have learned an important lesson."
I'm betting that swine hasn't made a genuine apology to anyone in his entire life.
CaptJasHook
(1,308 posts)Romney has been getting saved by his wealth and position since day one. He even weaseled his way out of the car crash in France where some one died.
This all seems like Sparta vs. Athens to me.
HankyDub
(246 posts)I'm sure many Americans are pleased to hear Mr. Romney walk this back. It was an offensive comment and I'm sure many people would appreciate it if he apologized for those comments.
Mr Romney has gotten quite a bit of bad press for this comment, and I'm sure he regrets that the video is out. But I'm just wondering if people believe that he was expressing his true sentiments in a private fundraiser or whether he is expressing his true sentiments now, on the debate stage in front of millions of the 47%.
Also, would Mr. Romney care to repudiate similar comments that are also on tape from his running mate?
That's just 5 minutes of me thinking about this. I'm sure the pro's could have worded it better.
Also, when Romney dropped that line about needing new accountants, that was the time to say that maybe that's the reason he decided not to release his income tax returns, because of all his bad accountants.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)NOW the story line is "Why was Obama so 'professorial'? Why didn't he throw some punches."
NOW Obama has carte blanche to brutalize Romney in the last 2 debates.
This is all exactly where it needs to be.
Zen. Romney won't figure out what happened to him for a year, if that.
Cha
(297,574 posts)I kept reading Wed night after debate.. "Why Didn't Obama bring up 47%s!?! Now, I know why..didn't give romney a chance to weasel out of it in front of 67 million people.
Surprised romney didn't bring it up himself..he was running the debate, wasn't he?
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)regnaD kciN
(26,045 posts)Had the President mentioned it, Willard would have sprung the "I was wrong to say that" faux-remorse act, and it would have "humanized" him in front of 67 million viewers, plus defused the issue for the rest of the campaign.
global1
(25,266 posts)He wasn't about to give Rmoney an opening to walk back the vile 47% comment. Now Rmoney is forced to walk it back post-debate and is really made to look like a weasel that it trying to save his own skin. Obama, the Dems, the Media and We The People should not let Rmoney get away with weaseling out of what we all know is how he really feels. We collectively have to put a stop to his lies. This is his big character flaw. This is what has got him through life this far. Living a life of privilege and lying, weaseling and buying his way out of trouble. He is not presidential material and he must be stopped. He must be put in his place and taught a lesson. He needs to be embarrassed to the point that he slinks away never to be recognized again.
onecent
(6,096 posts)TOTALLY on top of their game.....ABC and NBC are spinning crap like..."Why did Obama MISS such a
wonderful chance to speak and "he had his chance"..what do you think abouthim ruining it....fuckers..
chimpymustgo
(12,774 posts)stake through The Liar's dirty heart.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Mira
(22,380 posts)especially the "slinks away" part
central scrutinizer
(11,661 posts)bwah hah hah
Cha
(297,574 posts)KharmaTrain
(31,706 posts)This was to be expected...the corporate media is desperate for a "horse race"...and as long as Willard was upright and room temperature he was gonna win the debate. He'd been getting hammered for weeks due to his inept campaign. So, just like the team destined to lose 100 games, he rises up for one night and beats the first place club. It's his usual standing on third base and hitting a triple. If the corporate media paid attention to all his lies and flip flops the narrative would be different, but since they're desperate for ratings and "dish"...Willard is the winner. The problem is Willard really believes it.
This is all fine with me. I hope he gets over-confident...that surely will open this gaffe machine into more mistakes. It also sets a different stage for the remaining debates. Now he's the "masterdebater"...the expectations on the President are lower and hopefully he'll take advantage of this change and hammer the Bishop on all his lies.
The deal is even in "victory"...Willard's alienated people with his silly and unnecessary remarks about PBS (other than to intimidate Lehrer further)...as many people are focusing on that. In the end it'll be people remembering Willard debating "big bird" and not President Obama's lackluster performance...
sammytko
(2,480 posts)Blow him out of the water. Let him think he might win.
Like a cat plays with a defenseless baby mouse.
KharmaTrain
(31,706 posts)I think Willard let go with a lot of bombshells that can and should be used against him down the road. I'm hoping Stench thinks he's now master of the universe and walks into the next debate planning to replay the first debate. The unhinged...who've had nothing but bad news for months...jumped on this as signs of a pulse from the corpse. Willard is all over the place on so many issues now, my hopes is President Obama can just lead him into one corner after another...knock him off his script and that's when the Bishop starts to show the flop sweat and starts wagering $10k...
Cheers...
OLDMDDEM
(1,577 posts)Why not let Rmoney just open his mouth? When he does, the lies fall out. I realize that people will believe what is said, but once he begins the lies, all Obama has to do is the infamous Reagan line "There you go again" when responding to Mittens about what he was just saying. Call the liar a liar and let him seethe over it. Rmoney know what he is doing, and will keep doing it because it works. Obama has to pull a "Rick Perry" moment where he gets Rmoney riled up enough to come out of his space into Obama's space like he did during one of the debates. He lost his cool and was a blithering idiot after that.
renate
(13,776 posts)Welcome to DU!
OLDMDDEM
(1,577 posts)It's funny that the right keeps saying that Romney has momentum. Where? He blew his chances in the last debate. He had the Nixon sweating problem, he looked like a teenage bully that would cut someone's hair off for being gay, and he answered questions like an idiot.
Glad to be here at DU.
JustAnotherGen
(31,869 posts)"now - uh - now - you can't just make things up!"
Who said it ? President Obama. Now he just has to direct it at Romney.
bigtree
(86,005 posts). . . complaining that Obama didn't bring up the 47% remark of romney's?? (They run the Obama 47% ad constantly, during the day, here in Md. It's VERY effective.)
exboyfil
(17,865 posts)It does not look Presidential. On the other hand Obama really needed to respond to the $90B in subsidies to green energy being a waste. This is one of the cornerstones of Obama's vision of the future. Another thing would have been a better explanation of the Medicare cut argument - I am still trying to work my way through that. Finally when Romney said you can't balance the budget with tax increases - Obama should have mentioned that fellow before the idiot who was president - Bill Clinton - that is exactly what happened. Deficits before and deficits after (even before the crash) with shrinking deficits coming close to balanced in the middle when the tax rates were higher.
Cosmocat
(14,568 posts)that the president left out there, but I would not have used the 47% remark, either.
Now, Mittens saying his answer for medical care for people who did not have insurance was the Emergency Room? Would have noted that for sure.
There are 1000s of clips of Romney screaming "WE NEED TO CUT TAXES ON THE JOB CREATORS" out there from the primary this spring alone. Should have hit him with that, with the campaign set to release 100 clips backing it up, when he did his etch a sketch on taxes.
oswaldactedalone
(3,491 posts)Kick ass in the next two debates Obama team. Etch a Sketch is still out there though.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)liberal N proud
(60,340 posts)He could have thrown that in with the rest of his pack of lies.
kalli007
(683 posts)You know he just KNEW Obama was going to pounce on it - hell I thought he was!!! Now glad he did not because it is causing Robme to have to bring it up on his own, making his "so called apology" look as fake as his univision tan.
gkhouston
(21,642 posts)get the red out
(13,468 posts)Unless they are all out at the bank checking to make sure their social security deposit came in when it airs.
kalli007
(683 posts)and some D bag Rethug congressman fully explained to us peasants how during a campaign it is acceptable to say one thing during the primaries and another during the general election in order to garner more votes. I can see clearly now.....I was so confused
gkhouston
(21,642 posts)Rustycup
(41 posts)Obama after is responsible for actions people took forty years ago that happen to live in the same area of Chicago as him (Ayers). Republicans never took responsibility for their actions but want us to. They never see themselves as the bullies only the victims.
get the red out
(13,468 posts)The Republican philosophy is that if you say the word "values" enough you don't have to actually have any.
gkhouston
(21,642 posts)Only time will tell if he was believed and/or correct.
Indpndnt
(2,391 posts)By some, anyway. But to be caught saying it in secret to the Billionaire Buffoon's Club? And to suddenly say he was wrong only AFTER being crucified for it? No way. Not by anyone outside of his rabid base.
GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)Willard must have been watching that "South Park" episode where Cartman tries to atone for all of the horrible things he's done:
http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/103830/make-it-rightmontage
vaberella
(24,634 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Score one for Obama.
Romney On 47 Percent: I Said Something Thats Just Completely Wrong
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021475193
Astazia
(262 posts)Prepare for round two...The President sized up his opponent & now look out for rounds two & three...& lest us not forget Biden & Lyan'.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)We have to to stop playing Armchair Quarterback and start recognizing that Obama knows what he's doing.
Visually at first Obama may have seemed a bit boring but dig deep you'll find the guy knew what he was doing and did it well
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Indpndnt
(2,391 posts)The President defeated Hillary to get where he is and that is a huge deal. I think he can handle a dumbass like Willard.
BumRushDaShow
(129,376 posts)For all the DU hand-wringers, this has now forced Rmoney to throw his book under the bus and drive off on his own "Apology Tour".
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,033 posts)Romney congratulates himself on having graduated to Checkers from Tiddlywinks. Obama smiles and continues to play Chess.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Obama forced his hand and Romney was not able to get those zingers in there.
Indpndnt
(2,391 posts)What. An. Idiot.
Cha
(297,574 posts)Big Bird and his sons are Liars.
Those were Real Zingers
gordianot
(15,242 posts)katmondoo
(6,457 posts)Mitt on gave Obama lots to use against him. I like the two Mitts, one that showed up at the debate the other hiding.
Catherine Vincent
(34,491 posts)But wasn't it Candy Crowley who said this, who btw, is the next moderator. Bleh!
meadowlark5
(2,795 posts)Those two whiny babies after the debate on Weds night - so outraged, so disappointed. "Why didn't he bring up the 47%" they cried
Maybe Obama didn't perform the way everyone wanted, but Plouffe and his advisors knew that Romney's camp would be preparing for that issue - it's been a central topic for a couple of weeks. They knew Romney would try and weasel out of it in front of 67mil people. They didn't give him the satisfaction. Fantastic!!
nadine_mn
(3,702 posts)Last edited Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:50 PM - Edit history (1)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021466581
there is good reason Obama didn't bring it up!
edit to correct link
Indpndnt
(2,391 posts)Cha
(297,574 posts)nadine_mn
(3,702 posts)Thanks for letting me know
liberalmuse
(18,672 posts)Also a damn good gut instinct. That's our Prez!
The Wizard
(12,547 posts)is reporting that the debate changed the political landscape, and we now have a close race. The numbers indicate otherwise. For now Romney got a 1 point bump. When the social media hammers him for the next couple of days he could start going south again.
The media needs a close race to sell advertising, and as long as the media is profit motivated rather than fact motivated it's nothing more or less than propaganda.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)It prevented Romney from getting his so called "apology" out to a wider audience. If Romney wants to apologize make him pay for it in airtime.
liberalgunwilltravel
(336 posts)So after a nice ride into work on the motorcycle I got to thinking the best tact for the Obama campaign to take, both on the campaign trail and in the next debate. It can all be summed up in a single sentence. "Governor Romney, are you lying now or were you lying then?" Every time his tries to change his policy position in public or at the next debate, the television ads and the President should call him out on it. There are years worth of documented policy Mitt/flops. Just start making a long list of 30 second spots highlighting a few in each one and ending with the sentence. "Is he lying now, or was he lying then?"
It should be relentless, withering, and unapologetic.
So those are my nice post-ride thoughts.
Historic NY
(37,452 posts)he brought it up and walked it back so once again its in the news cycle. I sure we will hear more in the next week or so.
City Lights
(25,171 posts)You're lying in your new video. And your attempt to distance yourself from your true beliefs is pathetic. You suck.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)Why give Romney a perfect public-relations opportunity? Romney had an audience of 60 million. He had rehearsed and rehearsed and rehearsed.
Obama denied Romney a golden opportunity, and now Romney is scrambling like a pathetic fool to get out his crappy spin.
What a goofball. The 47-percent comments were all over the media for three weeks. The subject dominated the media and drove Romney's campaign off a cliff. He didn't have a response then???
He's got Kay Bailey Hutchison and other surrogates disseminating his bizarre lines.
Unfortunately, MSNBC played Romney's clips--where he went on the Hannity show--and disavowed his 47-percent comments.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)is rehearse and practice for the debates, besides occasional campaign stops. He was almost certainly itching to make some sort of dramatic mea culpa that would humanize him and allow him to move past the fact that he literally hates half of America.
central scrutinizer
(11,661 posts)Why didn't the Prez bring that up? Well played, sir! Get others to do the dirty work for you.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Rmoney likes his "boys" to look at him when he speaks. It probably pissed off Rmoney more when the President didn't comply.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)when all around him (including most of us) are shaking our fists in anger. Cool heads prevail.
Neutralator
(93 posts)Whereas Romney is using same attack plan on both fronts except of baiting Obama with bunch of lies and trying to change the narrative. Obama carefully avoided and didn't fall into the trap. Also he he didn't lose his attacking ammunition. Behind the doors, GOP-Robme must be wrecking their brain to come up entirely new set of attack plan.
Obama just needs to stay focused, stay on the message, keep pounding Robme in the same area until he cracks. No need for cheap tactical shots.
IMO, Romney is being slowly outmaneuvered into a corner.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)That's so sad.
Raine
(30,540 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Some DUers buy the admin's spin just like FoxNation believes theirs.
Rmoney trying to walk back that insult would have been another lob pitch for Obama
"Really? Your statement that you care nothing for half of America is now just a mis-speak? You really expect us to just act like it never happened? You already insulted their work ethic. Please don't insult our intelligence too."
HIs debate performance was horrible. The 9-D chess argument is bullshit. He showed critical lack of leadership. Get over it.
Edit: I am still waiting for another apologist to tell us how his constant looking down was some sort of secret "I got this" signal, or all all of the "umms" and "ahhs" were to throw Willard off of his game.