Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kalli007

(683 posts)
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:02 AM Oct 2012

On CNN - Robme WANTED Obama to bring up the 47%

He's released some stupid video saying how "wrong" he was about that comment, and his campaign stated that he wanted Obama to bring it up during the debate so he could "make it right" BUT HE DIDNT!!!!!!!!!!

75 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On CNN - Robme WANTED Obama to bring up the 47% (Original Post) kalli007 Oct 2012 OP
exactly. too easy to respond to. the obama strategists know not to just say the first thing unblock Oct 2012 #1
That video is powreful. Why would Obama want to give Romney a chance to weasel out of it? BlueStreak Oct 2012 #49
Enabled CaptJasHook Oct 2012 #52
then they should have thought of this: HankyDub Oct 2012 #54
If Obama had been snarky in the first debate, that would have been the story line, but now BlueStreak Oct 2012 #58
Thanks, BlueStreak, good logical points. Cha Oct 2012 #64
Maybe somebody forgot to type it up in his notes. BlueStreak Oct 2012 #70
That was what I expected... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #2
And That's Exactly Why Obama Played The Debate Like He Did... global1 Oct 2012 #13
I figured Obama KNEW what he was doing that night...and I think he was onecent Oct 2012 #24
That's the HUGE frustration about Obama's performance. He had a couple of dozen chances to drive a chimpymustgo Oct 2012 #27
I agree 100%. He is a bully SORELY in need of being taught a lesson! WinkyDink Oct 2012 #29
Well said... Mira Oct 2012 #46
Rmoney brought a Go Fish deck to a chess match central scrutinizer Oct 2012 #59
LOL The "Liars R Me" Special Edition nm Cha Oct 2012 #65
+1! uponit7771 Oct 2012 #62
Keep Spiking The Ball, Stench... KharmaTrain Oct 2012 #3
Maybe that's what the president wants, let mittwitt have one happy night and then sammytko Oct 2012 #16
It's Not How You Start Its Where You Finish... KharmaTrain Oct 2012 #19
Why not......... OLDMDDEM Oct 2012 #22
wouldn't it be great to see another moment like that? renate Oct 2012 #60
It's funny OLDMDDEM Oct 2012 #75
Even better JustAnotherGen Oct 2012 #74
so where are the self-righteous critics who tore their hair out yesterday bigtree Oct 2012 #4
I thought that was the smartest thing Obama did in the debate exboyfil Oct 2012 #12
There was some low hanging fruit Cosmocat Oct 2012 #14
I admit I was wrong oswaldactedalone Oct 2012 #25
A criticism doesn't make one "self-righteous". WinkyDink Oct 2012 #30
If it was that important to Romney, why didn't he bring it up? liberal N proud Oct 2012 #5
That would have made him look dumb.... kalli007 Oct 2012 #6
And he wanted to get it out so badly that he ran right to FoxNews to add to his lie-alanche. n/t gkhouston Oct 2012 #7
Wouldn't that hurt him with Fox News viewership? get the red out Oct 2012 #8
Oh noes!!! Just listening to CNN with Soledad this am kalli007 Oct 2012 #9
Why yes, I always think it's a good idea to lie during job interviews, don't you? n/t gkhouston Oct 2012 #11
But only if your republican Rustycup Oct 2012 #18
Values get the red out Oct 2012 #23
Clearly, he thought distancing himself from that remark would help more than it hurts. gkhouston Oct 2012 #10
If Willard had made the original statement about the 47% at a rally, he MIGHT be believed now. Indpndnt Oct 2012 #40
They're just now figuring that out? GoCubsGo Oct 2012 #15
People wanted Obama to bring it up too. Romney looks more like a fool b/c O didn't bring it up. n/t vaberella Oct 2012 #17
Now the idiot is apologizing ProSense Oct 2012 #20
Zinger Alert!!! Astazia Oct 2012 #21
I figured there was a reason for Obama to not mention the video LynneSin Oct 2012 #26
"We have to to stop playing Armchair Quarterback ...." I think we have every right to do so. WinkyDink Oct 2012 #32
As long as we recognize that we're doing it LynneSin Oct 2012 #33
Where did anyone say we couldn't? Just that we obviously don't have access to all the cards. Indpndnt Oct 2012 #41
Bingo! BumRushDaShow Oct 2012 #28
See! Obama's too smart to play Romney's game. Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2012 #31
Romney's biggest mistake was to mention about all the zingers he memorized LynneSin Oct 2012 #34
Yeah, that and mentioning his biggest campaign mistake right after his only 'triumph.' Indpndnt Oct 2012 #42
Except the ones about Cha Oct 2012 #66
The thing about apologies is you do not have to accept them. gordianot Oct 2012 #35
Also Obama said nothing that could be used against him katmondoo Oct 2012 #36
good call on the president's part Catherine Vincent Oct 2012 #37
Suck it Christ Matthews and Ed Schulz meadowlark5 Oct 2012 #38
exactly what I said in another post that got lost in the debate shuffle nadine_mn Oct 2012 #39
Yeah, there were a lot of great points made that quickly got buried in the post-debate deluge. Indpndnt Oct 2012 #43
That link is to DU Homepage, nadine.. I wanted to read what you said :) nm Cha Oct 2012 #67
Ahh thanks - I corrected it! nadine_mn Oct 2012 #73
Three. Dimensional. Chess. liberalmuse Oct 2012 #44
And the entire propaganda operation The Wizard Oct 2012 #45
I agree, I think not bringing up at the debate was wise davidpdx Oct 2012 #47
Is he lying now or was he lying then? liberalgunwilltravel Oct 2012 #48
Williard shot himself again in the foot.... Historic NY Oct 2012 #50
You weren't lying in the 47% video, Willard. City Lights Oct 2012 #51
Obama knew this....and that's why he didn't mention the 47 percent... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #53
Right--unlike Obama, Mittens doesn't actually have a JOB, all he does TwilightGardener Oct 2012 #56
And 47% is all over the media again as the pundits ask: central scrutinizer Oct 2012 #61
I think the President looked down instead of at Rmoney, because he knows valerief Oct 2012 #55
I think Obama keeps a cool head Generic Other Oct 2012 #57
Obama has opened two battle fronts -- One on the debate floor and the other outside of it. Neutralator Oct 2012 #63
So Mitt didn't get to "make it right" in front of 67 million viewers of the debate. Major Hogwash Oct 2012 #68
Inspite of what "know it all" Tweety thinks Obama KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING! nt Raine Oct 2012 #69
Bullshit Doctor_J Oct 2012 #71
I was sure Romney wanted it, so that he could disavow in front of 60 million people! nt. andym Oct 2012 #72

unblock

(52,309 posts)
1. exactly. too easy to respond to. the obama strategists know not to just say the first thing
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:06 AM
Oct 2012

that comes to mind. they think things through.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
49. That video is powreful. Why would Obama want to give Romney a chance to weasel out of it?
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:31 AM
Oct 2012

Especially considering there is new video with Ryan saying almost the same thing. "You are all lazy rotten takers. Me with my entire career being on the government payroll, I'm a maker."

So what if Romney goes on Faux and tries to disown it? That video speaks for itself. It is not going away. It is obvious to anybody who watches it that is the REAL Mitt Romney. So get used to it Mitt. You own that one. Go ahead and bring it up at the next debate. It won't make any difference.

After all, look at what has happened. He's been trying to explain that away since it came out. It isn't going away.

By the way, out of principle, I didn't watch the interview on Faux. Somebody tell me. Did he apologize to the people he insulted? I know he said "I'm a bad boy." But did he apologize? Did he say anything like "I know I was completely wrong in everything I said that night. I understand how offensive that is to so many people. I apologize to everyone I hurt with my words. I am so sorry and I have learned an important lesson."

I'm betting that swine hasn't made a genuine apology to anyone in his entire life.

CaptJasHook

(1,308 posts)
52. Enabled
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:37 AM
Oct 2012

Romney has been getting saved by his wealth and position since day one. He even weaseled his way out of the car crash in France where some one died.

This all seems like Sparta vs. Athens to me.

 

HankyDub

(246 posts)
54. then they should have thought of this:
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:44 AM
Oct 2012
I'm sure many Americans are pleased to hear Mr. Romney walk this back. It was an offensive comment and I'm sure many people would appreciate it if he apologized for those comments.

Mr Romney has gotten quite a bit of bad press for this comment, and I'm sure he regrets that the video is out. But I'm just wondering if people believe that he was expressing his true sentiments in a private fundraiser or whether he is expressing his true sentiments now, on the debate stage in front of millions of the 47%.

Also, would Mr. Romney care to repudiate similar comments that are also on tape from his running mate?


That's just 5 minutes of me thinking about this. I'm sure the pro's could have worded it better.

Also, when Romney dropped that line about needing new accountants, that was the time to say that maybe that's the reason he decided not to release his income tax returns, because of all his bad accountants.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
58. If Obama had been snarky in the first debate, that would have been the story line, but now
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:14 AM
Oct 2012

NOW the story line is "Why was Obama so 'professorial'? Why didn't he throw some punches."

NOW Obama has carte blanche to brutalize Romney in the last 2 debates.

This is all exactly where it needs to be.

Zen. Romney won't figure out what happened to him for a year, if that.

Cha

(297,574 posts)
64. Thanks, BlueStreak, good logical points.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 04:41 PM
Oct 2012

I kept reading Wed night after debate.. "Why Didn't Obama bring up 47%s!?! Now, I know why..didn't give romney a chance to weasel out of it in front of 67 million people.

Surprised romney didn't bring it up himself..he was running the debate, wasn't he?

regnaD kciN

(26,045 posts)
2. That was what I expected...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:08 AM
Oct 2012

Had the President mentioned it, Willard would have sprung the "I was wrong to say that" faux-remorse act, and it would have "humanized" him in front of 67 million viewers, plus defused the issue for the rest of the campaign.

global1

(25,266 posts)
13. And That's Exactly Why Obama Played The Debate Like He Did...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:52 AM
Oct 2012

He wasn't about to give Rmoney an opening to walk back the vile 47% comment. Now Rmoney is forced to walk it back post-debate and is really made to look like a weasel that it trying to save his own skin. Obama, the Dems, the Media and We The People should not let Rmoney get away with weaseling out of what we all know is how he really feels. We collectively have to put a stop to his lies. This is his big character flaw. This is what has got him through life this far. Living a life of privilege and lying, weaseling and buying his way out of trouble. He is not presidential material and he must be stopped. He must be put in his place and taught a lesson. He needs to be embarrassed to the point that he slinks away never to be recognized again.

onecent

(6,096 posts)
24. I figured Obama KNEW what he was doing that night...and I think he was
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:28 AM
Oct 2012

TOTALLY on top of their game.....ABC and NBC are spinning crap like..."Why did Obama MISS such a
wonderful chance to speak and "he had his chance"..what do you think abouthim ruining it....fuckers..

chimpymustgo

(12,774 posts)
27. That's the HUGE frustration about Obama's performance. He had a couple of dozen chances to drive a
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:33 AM
Oct 2012

stake through The Liar's dirty heart.

KharmaTrain

(31,706 posts)
3. Keep Spiking The Ball, Stench...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:13 AM
Oct 2012

This was to be expected...the corporate media is desperate for a "horse race"...and as long as Willard was upright and room temperature he was gonna win the debate. He'd been getting hammered for weeks due to his inept campaign. So, just like the team destined to lose 100 games, he rises up for one night and beats the first place club. It's his usual standing on third base and hitting a triple. If the corporate media paid attention to all his lies and flip flops the narrative would be different, but since they're desperate for ratings and "dish"...Willard is the winner. The problem is Willard really believes it.

This is all fine with me. I hope he gets over-confident...that surely will open this gaffe machine into more mistakes. It also sets a different stage for the remaining debates. Now he's the "masterdebater"...the expectations on the President are lower and hopefully he'll take advantage of this change and hammer the Bishop on all his lies.

The deal is even in "victory"...Willard's alienated people with his silly and unnecessary remarks about PBS (other than to intimidate Lehrer further)...as many people are focusing on that. In the end it'll be people remembering Willard debating "big bird" and not President Obama's lackluster performance...

sammytko

(2,480 posts)
16. Maybe that's what the president wants, let mittwitt have one happy night and then
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:06 AM
Oct 2012

Blow him out of the water. Let him think he might win.

Like a cat plays with a defenseless baby mouse.

KharmaTrain

(31,706 posts)
19. It's Not How You Start Its Where You Finish...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:15 AM
Oct 2012

I think Willard let go with a lot of bombshells that can and should be used against him down the road. I'm hoping Stench thinks he's now master of the universe and walks into the next debate planning to replay the first debate. The unhinged...who've had nothing but bad news for months...jumped on this as signs of a pulse from the corpse. Willard is all over the place on so many issues now, my hopes is President Obama can just lead him into one corner after another...knock him off his script and that's when the Bishop starts to show the flop sweat and starts wagering $10k...

Cheers...

OLDMDDEM

(1,577 posts)
22. Why not.........
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:22 AM
Oct 2012

Why not let Rmoney just open his mouth? When he does, the lies fall out. I realize that people will believe what is said, but once he begins the lies, all Obama has to do is the infamous Reagan line "There you go again" when responding to Mittens about what he was just saying. Call the liar a liar and let him seethe over it. Rmoney know what he is doing, and will keep doing it because it works. Obama has to pull a "Rick Perry" moment where he gets Rmoney riled up enough to come out of his space into Obama's space like he did during one of the debates. He lost his cool and was a blithering idiot after that.

OLDMDDEM

(1,577 posts)
75. It's funny
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 08:36 AM
Oct 2012

It's funny that the right keeps saying that Romney has momentum. Where? He blew his chances in the last debate. He had the Nixon sweating problem, he looked like a teenage bully that would cut someone's hair off for being gay, and he answered questions like an idiot.

Glad to be here at DU.

JustAnotherGen

(31,869 posts)
74. Even better
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 07:17 AM
Oct 2012

"now - uh - now - you can't just make things up!"

Who said it ? President Obama. Now he just has to direct it at Romney.

bigtree

(86,005 posts)
4. so where are the self-righteous critics who tore their hair out yesterday
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:14 AM
Oct 2012

. . . complaining that Obama didn't bring up the 47% remark of romney's?? (They run the Obama 47% ad constantly, during the day, here in Md. It's VERY effective.)

exboyfil

(17,865 posts)
12. I thought that was the smartest thing Obama did in the debate
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:46 AM
Oct 2012

It does not look Presidential. On the other hand Obama really needed to respond to the $90B in subsidies to green energy being a waste. This is one of the cornerstones of Obama's vision of the future. Another thing would have been a better explanation of the Medicare cut argument - I am still trying to work my way through that. Finally when Romney said you can't balance the budget with tax increases - Obama should have mentioned that fellow before the idiot who was president - Bill Clinton - that is exactly what happened. Deficits before and deficits after (even before the crash) with shrinking deficits coming close to balanced in the middle when the tax rates were higher.

Cosmocat

(14,568 posts)
14. There was some low hanging fruit
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:04 AM
Oct 2012

that the president left out there, but I would not have used the 47% remark, either.

Now, Mittens saying his answer for medical care for people who did not have insurance was the Emergency Room? Would have noted that for sure.

There are 1000s of clips of Romney screaming "WE NEED TO CUT TAXES ON THE JOB CREATORS" out there from the primary this spring alone. Should have hit him with that, with the campaign set to release 100 clips backing it up, when he did his etch a sketch on taxes.

oswaldactedalone

(3,491 posts)
25. I admit I was wrong
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:29 AM
Oct 2012

Kick ass in the next two debates Obama team. Etch a Sketch is still out there though.

liberal N proud

(60,340 posts)
5. If it was that important to Romney, why didn't he bring it up?
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:15 AM
Oct 2012

He could have thrown that in with the rest of his pack of lies.

kalli007

(683 posts)
6. That would have made him look dumb....
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:19 AM
Oct 2012

You know he just KNEW Obama was going to pounce on it - hell I thought he was!!! Now glad he did not because it is causing Robme to have to bring it up on his own, making his "so called apology" look as fake as his univision tan.

get the red out

(13,468 posts)
8. Wouldn't that hurt him with Fox News viewership?
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:34 AM
Oct 2012

Unless they are all out at the bank checking to make sure their social security deposit came in when it airs.

kalli007

(683 posts)
9. Oh noes!!! Just listening to CNN with Soledad this am
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:42 AM
Oct 2012

and some D bag Rethug congressman fully explained to us peasants how during a campaign it is acceptable to say one thing during the primaries and another during the general election in order to garner more votes. I can see clearly now.....I was so confused

Rustycup

(41 posts)
18. But only if your republican
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:12 AM
Oct 2012

Obama after is responsible for actions people took forty years ago that happen to live in the same area of Chicago as him (Ayers). Republicans never took responsibility for their actions but want us to. They never see themselves as the bullies only the victims.

get the red out

(13,468 posts)
23. Values
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:24 AM
Oct 2012

The Republican philosophy is that if you say the word "values" enough you don't have to actually have any.

gkhouston

(21,642 posts)
10. Clearly, he thought distancing himself from that remark would help more than it hurts.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:43 AM
Oct 2012

Only time will tell if he was believed and/or correct.

Indpndnt

(2,391 posts)
40. If Willard had made the original statement about the 47% at a rally, he MIGHT be believed now.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:03 AM
Oct 2012

By some, anyway. But to be caught saying it in secret to the Billionaire Buffoon's Club? And to suddenly say he was wrong only AFTER being crucified for it? No way. Not by anyone outside of his rabid base.

GoCubsGo

(32,086 posts)
15. They're just now figuring that out?
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:06 AM
Oct 2012

Willard must have been watching that "South Park" episode where Cartman tries to atone for all of the horrible things he's done:
http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/103830/make-it-rightmontage

Astazia

(262 posts)
21. Zinger Alert!!!
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:21 AM
Oct 2012
NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




Prepare for round two...The President sized up his opponent & now look out for rounds two & three...& lest us not forget Biden & Lyan'.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
26. I figured there was a reason for Obama to not mention the video
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:31 AM
Oct 2012

We have to to stop playing Armchair Quarterback and start recognizing that Obama knows what he's doing.

Visually at first Obama may have seemed a bit boring but dig deep you'll find the guy knew what he was doing and did it well

Indpndnt

(2,391 posts)
41. Where did anyone say we couldn't? Just that we obviously don't have access to all the cards.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:05 AM
Oct 2012

The President defeated Hillary to get where he is and that is a huge deal. I think he can handle a dumbass like Willard.

BumRushDaShow

(129,376 posts)
28. Bingo!
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:33 AM
Oct 2012

For all the DU hand-wringers, this has now forced Rmoney to throw his book under the bus and drive off on his own "Apology Tour".

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,033 posts)
31. See! Obama's too smart to play Romney's game.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:39 AM
Oct 2012

Romney congratulates himself on having graduated to Checkers from Tiddlywinks. Obama smiles and continues to play Chess.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
34. Romney's biggest mistake was to mention about all the zingers he memorized
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:41 AM
Oct 2012

Obama forced his hand and Romney was not able to get those zingers in there.

Indpndnt

(2,391 posts)
42. Yeah, that and mentioning his biggest campaign mistake right after his only 'triumph.'
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:07 AM
Oct 2012

What. An. Idiot.

katmondoo

(6,457 posts)
36. Also Obama said nothing that could be used against him
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:44 AM
Oct 2012

Mitt on gave Obama lots to use against him. I like the two Mitts, one that showed up at the debate the other hiding.

Catherine Vincent

(34,491 posts)
37. good call on the president's part
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:51 AM
Oct 2012

But wasn't it Candy Crowley who said this, who btw, is the next moderator. Bleh!

meadowlark5

(2,795 posts)
38. Suck it Christ Matthews and Ed Schulz
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:52 AM
Oct 2012

Those two whiny babies after the debate on Weds night - so outraged, so disappointed. "Why didn't he bring up the 47%" they cried

Maybe Obama didn't perform the way everyone wanted, but Plouffe and his advisors knew that Romney's camp would be preparing for that issue - it's been a central topic for a couple of weeks. They knew Romney would try and weasel out of it in front of 67mil people. They didn't give him the satisfaction. Fantastic!!

nadine_mn

(3,702 posts)
39. exactly what I said in another post that got lost in the debate shuffle
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:00 AM
Oct 2012

Last edited Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:50 PM - Edit history (1)


http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021466581

there is good reason Obama didn't bring it up!

edit to correct link

The Wizard

(12,547 posts)
45. And the entire propaganda operation
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:11 AM
Oct 2012

is reporting that the debate changed the political landscape, and we now have a close race. The numbers indicate otherwise. For now Romney got a 1 point bump. When the social media hammers him for the next couple of days he could start going south again.
The media needs a close race to sell advertising, and as long as the media is profit motivated rather than fact motivated it's nothing more or less than propaganda.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
47. I agree, I think not bringing up at the debate was wise
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:20 AM
Oct 2012

It prevented Romney from getting his so called "apology" out to a wider audience. If Romney wants to apologize make him pay for it in airtime.

48. Is he lying now or was he lying then?
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:21 AM
Oct 2012

So after a nice ride into work on the motorcycle I got to thinking the best tact for the Obama campaign to take, both on the campaign trail and in the next debate. It can all be summed up in a single sentence. "Governor Romney, are you lying now or were you lying then?" Every time his tries to change his policy position in public or at the next debate, the television ads and the President should call him out on it. There are years worth of documented policy Mitt/flops. Just start making a long list of 30 second spots highlighting a few in each one and ending with the sentence. "Is he lying now, or was he lying then?"

It should be relentless, withering, and unapologetic.

So those are my nice post-ride thoughts.

Historic NY

(37,452 posts)
50. Williard shot himself again in the foot....
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:31 AM
Oct 2012

he brought it up and walked it back so once again its in the news cycle. I sure we will hear more in the next week or so.

City Lights

(25,171 posts)
51. You weren't lying in the 47% video, Willard.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:34 AM
Oct 2012

You're lying in your new video. And your attempt to distance yourself from your true beliefs is pathetic. You suck.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
53. Obama knew this....and that's why he didn't mention the 47 percent...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:40 AM
Oct 2012

Why give Romney a perfect public-relations opportunity? Romney had an audience of 60 million. He had rehearsed and rehearsed and rehearsed.

Obama denied Romney a golden opportunity, and now Romney is scrambling like a pathetic fool to get out his crappy spin.

What a goofball. The 47-percent comments were all over the media for three weeks. The subject dominated the media and drove Romney's campaign off a cliff. He didn't have a response then???

He's got Kay Bailey Hutchison and other surrogates disseminating his bizarre lines.

Unfortunately, MSNBC played Romney's clips--where he went on the Hannity show--and disavowed his 47-percent comments.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
56. Right--unlike Obama, Mittens doesn't actually have a JOB, all he does
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:51 AM
Oct 2012

is rehearse and practice for the debates, besides occasional campaign stops. He was almost certainly itching to make some sort of dramatic mea culpa that would humanize him and allow him to move past the fact that he literally hates half of America.

central scrutinizer

(11,661 posts)
61. And 47% is all over the media again as the pundits ask:
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 11:24 AM
Oct 2012

Why didn't the Prez bring that up? Well played, sir! Get others to do the dirty work for you.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
55. I think the President looked down instead of at Rmoney, because he knows
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:51 AM
Oct 2012

Rmoney likes his "boys" to look at him when he speaks. It probably pissed off Rmoney more when the President didn't comply.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
57. I think Obama keeps a cool head
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:00 AM
Oct 2012

when all around him (including most of us) are shaking our fists in anger. Cool heads prevail.

Neutralator

(93 posts)
63. Obama has opened two battle fronts -- One on the debate floor and the other outside of it.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 04:33 PM
Oct 2012

Whereas Romney is using same attack plan on both fronts except of baiting Obama with bunch of lies and trying to change the narrative. Obama carefully avoided and didn't fall into the trap. Also he he didn't lose his attacking ammunition. Behind the doors, GOP-Robme must be wrecking their brain to come up entirely new set of attack plan.

Obama just needs to stay focused, stay on the message, keep pounding Robme in the same area until he cracks. No need for cheap tactical shots.

IMO, Romney is being slowly outmaneuvered into a corner.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
71. Bullshit
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:39 PM
Oct 2012

Some DUers buy the admin's spin just like FoxNation believes theirs.

Rmoney trying to walk back that insult would have been another lob pitch for Obama

"Really? Your statement that you care nothing for half of America is now just a mis-speak? You really expect us to just act like it never happened? You already insulted their work ethic. Please don't insult our intelligence too."

HIs debate performance was horrible. The 9-D chess argument is bullshit. He showed critical lack of leadership. Get over it.

Edit: I am still waiting for another apologist to tell us how his constant looking down was some sort of secret "I got this" signal, or all all of the "umms" and "ahhs" were to throw Willard off of his game.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On CNN - Robme WANTED Oba...