A Win? ( Nance Greggs article)
BY NANCEGREGGS, ON OCTOBER 4TH, 2012
http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2012/10/04/a-win/
MUCH More at link. I'm trying to edit it down more but it keeps timing out...
"...What I saw last night was a President who had prepared for an honest debate on the issues. But there was no debate. One cannot debate lies and misrepresentations. One can’t argue about whose plans for the country are more sound, when their opponent is simply pulling “facts” out of their own ass.
Most importantly, no serious politician should be expected to score points based on whose lies are better told than his opponent’s.
But that’s exactly what Obama was expected to do, to counter non-facts presented as though they were the truth, to take seriously a man who changed his former positions and proffered them as long-held policies. And the MSM was more than anxious to hang the Winner’s Wreath around the neck of the man who, in their estimation, lied like a true champ.
What I took away from last night’s performance was a renewed admiration for a man who honors his position by keeping it uppermost in his mind, and conducting himself accordingly. Despite being continually baited into the mud pit, Obama was steadfast in his refusal to get just as dirty as his opponent. He stuck to the truth and the facts – apparently to the dismay of those who thought, even momentarily, that a good roll in the shit was called for...
Needless to say, the Mitt adorers know no more today than they did yesterday about how he intends to accomplish all he has repeatedly promised. No specifics, no numbers, no details – just the same old/same old “elect me first, and then we’ll discuss it” obfuscation that a well-practiced flim-flam man extols before the satisfaction guaranteed or your money happily refunded label falls off the bottle of cat piss he’s passed off as a cure-all for all that ails a troubled populace.
I’ve seen a lot of Where was Obama? comments today. I can’t help but wonder where those who pose the question have been for the past four years. Well, he was right there, not acting presidential, but being presidential – the very personification of a man who, by virtue of his own principles and those rightly attributable to the office he holds, was not about to engage in a game of I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I. He instead engaged his real audience, the voters interested in the truth rather than the bullshit being tossed around on stage by an idiot too politically ambitious to be honest, and too self-absorbed to believe that something as expendable as the truth should stand in his way...
When you’re running for the highest office in the land, the most powerful position on the face of the earth, and what sticks with the voters is your War on Sesame Street, you’ve got to figure that your grand-slam debate performance was nothing more than a flash in Oscar’s garbage can – only far less important in the great scheme of things.
And so it was.
= new reply since forum marked as read
and going to bed. 
Either choose one or support them both.
Nance needs to be heard. We all miss her. So support all the Nance Greggs posts. That way we don't miss promoting our former DU icon.
We miss you Nance!
Nance!!! 
Thanks for the thread, Lucinda.
BigBird was biting back by the time he got to the next sentence.
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Kudos for using "Ronnie, the Bren Gun Girl".
