Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You know, by NOT bringing up the 47% last night... (Original Post) Rosco T. Oct 2012 OP
That's a very good point. Indpndnt Oct 2012 #1
On Lawrence O'Donnell's show Politicalboi Oct 2012 #2
That's true. MrSlayer Oct 2012 #3
It was conspicuous by its absence. Besides, landolfi Oct 2012 #4
Absolutely. Romney had a practiced line ready to address it and may have salvaged his reputation BenzoDia Oct 2012 #5
Post removed Post removed Oct 2012 #6
The 47% comment doesn't even come close to being "the truth" scheming daemons Oct 2012 #8
Uh yes it is. nt Raine Oct 2012 #12
Not smart-- I don't care how far you twist it. Marr Oct 2012 #7
Obama playing chess again. n/t EmeraldCityGrl Oct 2012 #9
Was wise not to give him a chance to explain it away. Rmoney owns it Raine Oct 2012 #10
Just another perspective on this... Justkd1 Oct 2012 #11
I Guarantee Rmoney Had A Canned Response Ready For That ChoppinBroccoli Oct 2012 #13

Indpndnt

(2,391 posts)
1. That's a very good point.
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 10:24 PM
Oct 2012

He was planning to weasel out of it as we just learned with his new Faux interview. Let it fester. It's not going away.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
2. On Lawrence O'Donnell's show
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 10:30 PM
Oct 2012

Rmoney just said on Shit Hannity show that he was wrong about the 47%. So if Obama would have brought it up last night, Rmoney may have said the same thing. But WE all know he would say it again in the "right" setting. He would say that and worse. I hope there is another Rmoney moment of him being himself on video.

I think Rmoney's name should be Me2 Rmoney. He likes teachers, parts of Obamacare, likes tax cuts for all, like job creation. This Etch A Sketch is getting really fuzzy.

landolfi

(234 posts)
4. It was conspicuous by its absence. Besides,
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 10:49 PM
Oct 2012

if O had brought it up it would have been R$'s chance to weep with sorrow over his inelegant words in front of 70M people and grandstand about his undying love for all creatures great and small...

BenzoDia

(1,010 posts)
5. Absolutely. Romney had a practiced line ready to address it and may have salvaged his reputation
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 10:49 PM
Oct 2012

some with it.

Response to Rosco T. (Original post)

 

scheming daemons

(25,487 posts)
8. The 47% comment doesn't even come close to being "the truth"
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 10:55 PM
Oct 2012

But you go ahead and tout it. Every time the video is shown, Romney drops another point in the polls.


Even the polls you wingnuts accept, like Rasmussen.
 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
7. Not smart-- I don't care how far you twist it.
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 10:52 PM
Oct 2012

It's on tape. It's pissed people off in the extreme. Bringing it up should've been a no-brainer.

Even if Romney had a nice, pre-rehearsed excuse, he would've only come off as a huge liar.

Raine

(30,540 posts)
10. Was wise not to give him a chance to explain it away. Rmoney owns it
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 11:03 PM
Oct 2012

it's stuck to him like glue and he can't shake it.

Justkd1

(64 posts)
11. Just another perspective on this...
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 11:06 PM
Oct 2012

My retired mother, an Independent leaning Democrat, said she was glad Obama didn't stoop to Mitt's level just to score a couple of cheap points with the 47% bull.

I agree with her...it's already an albatross around his neck...so what if he went to Faux News to beg forgiveness! It is him, on a tape, telling millionaires half the country mooches off of the government!

ChoppinBroccoli

(3,784 posts)
13. I Guarantee Rmoney Had A Canned Response Ready For That
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 11:50 PM
Oct 2012

One thing I've learned as a trial attorney is this: if a witness makes a damning statement that destroys his entire credibility and/or case, you don't give him/her the chance to correct it or take it back or explain it away. You let it fester in the jury's ears.

This is what Obama did by NOT bringing up those things. Do you REALLY think there are people out there who haven't heard about the 47% comments? Why give him a chance to explain it away? If you ask me, NOT mentioning it is the smartest thing Obama could have done.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You know, by NOT bringing...