General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAsk any Olympic champ -- timing is everything
After listening to a lot of commentary today on President's Obama's response last night to the chronically lying Mitt Romney, I suddenly started thinking about the timing issue constraints within a debate format. I do think President Obama was stunned at the magnitude of prevarication Romney espoused, and in one moment's time he had to make a strategy decision: respond or ignore.
I believe he decided to ignore the lies because he sensed it was a debate trap. If he had used his allotted two minutes to indulge in a campaign of accusing his opponent of lying, he would lose the opportunity to explain his position on the issue under discussion. It was more important to President Obama to preserve that opportunity to make important points he had chosen to share with the listening viewership rather than sacrifice that opportunity to succumb to a Romney debate trap. Had President Obama gone with the first option, the option of responding to the lies, Mitt Romney would have simply countered with accusations that President Obama himself was distorting the truth to engage in character assassination of his opponent. It would have been fruitless for President Obama to so engage in a tit-for-tat upon that debate stage, one he could not win, and the choice of indulging would have resulted in President Obama's failure to submit points for consideration on the topic at hand he considered important.
Obama also knew the fact-checkers would emerge that evening and in subsequent days, and Mitt's posturing as a populist candidate, a man determined to protect the interests of the middle class and the poor, would wilt with the light of the new day.
So in this regard, I believe President Obama in refusing to be baited by Romney and reserving his time for answers to the debate topics instead made the strategically correct decision.
Timing is everything in matters such as this, and President Obama chose to use his time wisely rather than to be baited by Romney's trap. Obama's strategic choice made Romney a Chump and Obama a Champ. Why do I say this? Because in listening to today's commentary, a great number of people are calling Romney a liar and still cheering for President Obama.
So what is next for Romney?
Hang a gold Olympic medal around that man's neck. Fastest liar in a two minute sprint on political record. Inscribe the gold medal "Liar in Chief" which is far more appropriate for him than the title Commander-in-Chief. Reserve that title for the smartest participant in the debate competition last night.
Sam
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Kick his ass over it later, on your terms, Mr. President!
Samantha
(9,314 posts)He tried to play President Obama for a chump, and it backfired! Thank you so much for your response.
Sam
upi402
(16,854 posts)Samantha
(9,314 posts)Romney today is the victim of his own political trap backfiring. Can't you see the ads now in progress the Obama team is putting together for the swing states? Mitt versus Mitt: If elected which version will play in the Oval Office? And then they will play the Before videos and the After. It will have the effect of showing that Mitt Romney is just who we have always thought he was, a candidate who can spin on a dime if and when necessary on any position at any time.
Sam
upi402
(16,854 posts)That's what I'm doing.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)dealing the knock-out punch to Romney will be Romney himself, particularly if that cheating scandal turns out to be unquestionably true. I think it just might be but am in wait to see mode. Just got home and have not read all of the reports yet.
Thanks for posting on my thread.
Sam
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Either Obama's team had a plan or Obama on the spot decided to ignore the lies rather than engage in tit-for-tat.
Whether that was a good decision is another matter, but I can see it unfolding precisely as you described. Nicely done.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)Mitt underestimated his opponent. President Obama is not just any other political animal. This is a man who knows what he is doing. He kept his composure throughout the charade and walked away without a bruise on him. He knew in the aftermath of the debate the fact-checkers would take care of any unfinished business.
Sam
landolfi
(234 posts)Samantha
(9,314 posts)people are having second thoughts about who actually won that debate. It is a good thing.
Thanks for posting on my thread and sharing that link.
Sam
landolfi
(234 posts)This is a marathon, not a sprint. It's amazing to me that the people who think Obama didn't do well still think he's right. He took the high road, and it will pay off in the long run.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)And I am glad some people recognize it. But we still have the worrisome problem of those voting machines with former Bain associates connected to their ownership out there in the swing states. That to me is a huge problem.
Sam