General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaddow is showing clips how Mondale skewered incumbent Reagan in debate.....
How Reagan wasn't prepared, did a bad job. Mondale had a very good night. Reagan had had four practice debates, and was as bad in each of them, his team admitted, as he was in the actual debate.
Pundits saying that if Reagan had won the debate, it would've clinched the election. Instead, it game the Democrats new life.
Sound familiar?
It's okay to lose a debate. It's one night, one debate. It's not an election. And CERTAINLY doesn't mean the debate winner challening an incumbent will win anything other than that debate.
The next day, Reagan had a smile on his face, and his supporters showed up in droves to hear him speak. Sound familiar again?
(She covers other examples. Results: they almost never go on to win the election.)
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)Yes, bedwetting that you actively partook in last night yourself, Rachel.
DemzRock
(1,016 posts)MsNBC seems to be doing better since the Dem Con. But if they decide that this is the time to pander to everyone and lose their niche, well, we have some alternatives.
Stephanie Miller, for example!
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)...."YEAAAA!" thing she does when they cut back from that disaster in Denver.
DemzRock
(1,016 posts)MsNBC proved to me last night that they just wanted the horse race.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)the first debate.
So, Maddow said: Buck up kiddies (or kiddos or something like that)
Mike Daniels
(5,842 posts)Ford lost, Carter lost and HW lost.
A 50/50 success rate for being the incumbent, losing the first debate and coming back to be re-elected doesn't give Rachel's argument a lot of strength. That comes down to a coin flip.
"You get one chance to make a good first impression" isn't a recognized truism just for sh.ts and giggles. The last debate covering foreign policy is going to be competing with Monday Night Football for viewers. I will be voting for Obama but since the VP debate counts for nothing re: voting choices if Obama muffs the town hall meeting Rachel can put her spin in the circular file.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)and President Obama does very well at those.
warrior1
(12,325 posts)Lying and talking over everyone and not following instruction would and should fail rmoney.
DemzRock
(1,016 posts)1> He was strong and wrong.
2> The media wanted him to win to keep the horse race going and sell soap.
((Also 3. Obama played it safe and by the rules. There is the possibility this was intentional. We'll see.))
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)I was watching the debate. I really wanted him to win. But it was painful, watching Obama struggle. I didn't need the media to tell me anything. I knew what was what.
I also saw one of those stupid focus groups of low-info undecideds on TV. 19 people. 17 thought Romney had won. They had been kept from the media while watching the debate and afterwards.
But YES, the media is delighted at the results of the debate. The thing about the debate results, though, is that I think there is no shame to Obama not doing well. No one wins everything all the time. And since I've seen every one of O's debates since he started running for the 2008 election, I know that debating isn't his strong point. He's good, but not great at it. His manner of speaking doesn't lend itself to it (the thoughtful pauses, the thinking through of statements, etc.). I also don't think a President HAS to be great at debating.
Why are there debates, anyway?
DemzRock
(1,016 posts)I didn't say Obama won. I think you misunderstood me.
Let me rephrase.
Myth Romney won because he was strong and wrong.
The media helped to propagate and exaggerate his win, because they wanted that result.
Obama played it too calm and didn't fight back sharply. There are several possible reasons for this. He was playing by the rules of the debate. He may have had too good an anniversary. He let it happen. It could have been a tactical move.
We shall see.
But in any case, there is more fun to come! I really look forward to Biden/Ryan.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)behind the people thinking Romney won. I think they really did think, during the debate, that Romney was winning.
First time ever a poll showed over 60% people thinking a candidate won a Presidential debate. I used myself as an example. I gradually came to the conclusion that Romney was "winning," even though I didn't need anyone to tell me that. I could see it.
What I think is the difference, with me, anyway, is the weight I give the debate. I don't give it the big weight that some others do. It's important, but not all-important. It was just one night, one debate. And the fact that a lot of people thought Romney won doesn't translate into votes, necessarily. Example: I can think that Romney won, but that doesn't change my vote.
I also don't think this was some super secret extra sharp tactical move on Obama's part to trap Romney. No one foresaw that Romney would do what he did. No President wants to be seen as unprepared, distracted, off his game, or weak.
But...eh....it was just one night. Obama's in a good position for the election.
andym
(5,445 posts)Reagan seemed to have trouble recalling what he wanted to say, as if he were having serious problems with his memory. In the next debate he was in top form.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Nancy started prompting his answers to questions, occasionally answering for him, his memory seemed to get really bad.
andym
(5,445 posts)Alzheimer's is a progressive disease and the brain atrophy and dysfunction often occurs years before Alzheimer's is officially diagnosed.
gkhouston
(21,642 posts)Looks like Clinton is the only won to have won his first debate.