General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI watched debate on c-span
I had no idea that that networks showed a split screen, I wonder if that changes perception, from c-span I didn't think Obama did as bad as everyone was making it out to be
elleng
(131,057 posts)I watched MSNBC first, and C-SPAN next, until 3:30 a.m., at suggestion of a DUer. DUer said:
I had quite a change of perspective. The C-SPAN rerun has both candidates side by side, full frontal view of both. In a word... The president was SPECTACULAR!
The president was calm, forceful, intense, focused, and completely in control.
Romney was frantic, wild, fake, wordy, patronizing not to mention inaccurate.
It's the setting of the venue the first time around with the distant, side split screen thing that really hurt the accuracy of the candidates demeanour.
craigmatic
(4,510 posts)landslide. They want to play up the drama for ratings. In a fair world they'd say that mittens talked over everyone so much last night because he was desperate and that's also why he changed his positions again.
BumRushDaShow
(129,317 posts)or people will turn them off.
gabeana
(3,166 posts)we watched on C-span thought Obama did fine then turned on the radio people nashing their teeth about Obama, I was taken aback by that
arcane1
(38,613 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)smirking the whole way through.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)and turned it off after 30 minutes. My perception is completely different than yours. I thought the President came off very badly.
spockeye
(238 posts)I watched the debate on C-SPAN as well. Until I heard all the chatter afterwards, I actually thought the POTUS had come out on top. The story should be about the fact checking.
valerief
(53,235 posts)the internet told me.