Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 03:23 PM Oct 2012

What the hell does "trickle-down government" mean?

Romney pulled that zinger out last night and it's something I've never heard. It's obviously a counter to the Democratic criticism of Republican trickle down, supply side economics philosophy. But what does it mean? Does it further Romney's argument that 47% of Americans are "takers" who count on entitlements to "trickle down" from government above? Veterans counting on their medical benefits and pensions are beneficiaries of trickle down government? Students counting on their student loans are parasitic takers who rely on trickle down government? Seniors expecting their SS checks are leeches who can only survive on the trickling down syrup from big government above?


44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What the hell does "trickle-down government" mean? (Original Post) aint_no_life_nowhere Oct 2012 OP
You just know that was supposed to be the defining phrase. LiberalAndProud Oct 2012 #1
yep. romney campaign ad this morning focused on the phrase Viva_La_Revolution Oct 2012 #11
Post removed Post removed Oct 2012 #20
It's meaningless. Scootaloo Oct 2012 #2
It's clever sounding gibberish. n/t lumberjack_jeff Oct 2012 #3
I thought it meant welfare checks falling down on the 47% like manna from heaven. nc4bo Oct 2012 #4
It is another republican projection liberal N proud Oct 2012 #5
Great point aint_no_life_nowhere Oct 2012 #6
well, trickle down government newspeak Oct 2012 #43
I want my government to serve me. mzmolly Oct 2012 #7
I think it means, Bend over, here it comes again. nt raccoon Oct 2012 #8
It means they're trying to defend Trickle Down Economics Glitterati Oct 2012 #9
It's word salad. Dinner sized, not entree. kestrel91316 Oct 2012 #10
Yes. It was a way to short term his 47% remark. Solly Mack Oct 2012 #12
Trickle down is used to indicate small droplets, or an intermittent, unconstrained "spray" haele Oct 2012 #13
Palinesque word salad. hifiguy Oct 2012 #14
Power Controls the Meme demlefty Oct 2012 #15
Can there be an effective government that isn't "trickle-down"? aint_no_life_nowhere Oct 2012 #16
"trickle-down" ............ that means it drips down Angry Dragon Oct 2012 #25
Hardly an original phrase, been used as early as '97 alp227 Oct 2012 #17
"We're up here, pissing on you" n/t LadyHawkAZ Oct 2012 #18
I think that is an excellent question... kentuck Oct 2012 #19
It must have been one of those famous zingers lunatica Oct 2012 #21
It means it is working as designed AlleninHartwellGA Oct 2012 #22
...... Angry Dragon Oct 2012 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2012 #35
'Golden Shower' sounds so much better Angry Dragon Oct 2012 #36
Possible AlleninHartwellGA Oct 2012 #38
You need to look up and understand what "trickle down" means as it pertains to government: Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2012 #41
Government should flow and not trickle down Angry Dragon Oct 2012 #42
No meaning - it's Orwellian to confuse the ignorant malaise Oct 2012 #23
I love your response underthematrix Oct 2012 #28
It's what happened when he put Seamus on the roof of his car --- jerseygal Oct 2012 #26
It's a Repuke idea Politicalboi Oct 2012 #27
it's what a bully says back when he doesn't understand your insult. unblock Oct 2012 #29
It means when they piss on you, 2pooped2pop Oct 2012 #30
It means we're winning. It's psy-ops. NashvilleLefty Oct 2012 #31
yeah, and they've been shoveling it down our throat for over thirty fekkin years newspeak Oct 2012 #44
The new national motto will be HillWilliam Oct 2012 #32
If the 1% didn't profit from the trickle-down government.... Amonester Oct 2012 #33
It's code for "We're going to completely fuck you over and there is nothing you can do about it." smirkymonkey Oct 2012 #34
It Means Republicans Pissing Down On You Megahurtz Oct 2012 #37
Same thing as trickle down economics. hobbit709 Oct 2012 #39
it was the easiest thing Romney could remember. it means nothing. stlsaxman Oct 2012 #40

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)
1. You just know that was supposed to be the defining phrase.
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 03:25 PM
Oct 2012

It doesn't resonate because it is nonsensical. And if trickle down government is the opposite of trickle down economics, I'll take it.

Response to LiberalAndProud (Reply #1)

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
2. It's meaningless.
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 03:26 PM
Oct 2012

It's a pair of catch-phrase words strung together, intended to cause a reaction rather than make a point. It's an attempt to pair "Trickle-down," a discredited theory that liberals loathe, with "government," something conservatives hate, and then glue it to Obama. it doesn't make any sense.

But it doesn't have to.

Think of it like the term "islamo-fascism," a reactionary word that fails examination.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
4. I thought it meant welfare checks falling down on the 47% like manna from heaven.
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 03:28 PM
Oct 2012


Mitt trying to be clever = FAIL

liberal N proud

(60,339 posts)
5. It is another republican projection
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 03:29 PM
Oct 2012

They have trickle down economics that makes the rich, richer. So they want to tag anything the government does to help people trickle down.

But if it were truly trickle down, the government would be getting richer and we wouldn't need to discuss deficits and debt.

newspeak

(4,847 posts)
43. well, trickle down government
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 12:26 PM
Oct 2012

since, you and me pay into government, means my money comes back down to my family and your family and our infrastructure. when everyone is able to survive without abject poverty, there is less crime (with regulation that also include white collar crime) and a more educated populace (public education) means more service for you and me.

now, trickle on economics, means the wealthy and large corporate owners have more money, which they do not like to share and when investing, any slave wage country will do. most, don't really care about this country or it's people, as long as they can get the lowest wage for their value, shite in your backyard without any old regulations and make sure WS is taken care of. Some of their wealth may, just may trickle on americans. They don't want to sacrifice during times of war, but clearly love making profits from it, especially, when it is our money. and worker loyalty is a thing of the past. pensions are not something that is earned, but paying something that was an asset and now is deemed a liability. Of course, some can make even more money off of that liability by taking life insurance out on their employees and instead of giving it to the struggling family, they've made another asset. a bunch of greedy, sociopathic sick feks.

 

Glitterati

(3,182 posts)
9. It means they're trying to defend Trickle Down Economics
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 03:34 PM
Oct 2012

That's all.

They KNOW Trickle Down only works for the rich. We all do.

But, it's their only game. Always has been, always will be.

So they're trying to defend it by throwing monkey shit in the fan.

Solly Mack

(90,778 posts)
12. Yes. It was a way to short term his 47% remark.
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 03:39 PM
Oct 2012

It was a play on trickle -down economics (from "free-markets"/private business) v. government working to help/better society with business/work regulations, safety nets, education.

A way to push the right-wing talking point that private can do it better than government. That government is the problem and privatization is the the solution. It's an all encompassing catch-all phrase for all of the right-wing talking points.

I'm sure he meant it to be clever. It wasn't.

It was just another way to insult people.



haele

(12,665 posts)
13. Trickle down is used to indicate small droplets, or an intermittent, unconstrained "spray"
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 03:51 PM
Oct 2012

So logically, trickle down Government is when only a little bit of government resources - money and services - is distributed or "trickled down".

Sounds like a Tea Party/Republican/Randriod plan where Government is an exclusive ruling club that provides services as "nobless oblige" or charity.


Haele

demlefty

(1 post)
15. Power Controls the Meme
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 07:38 PM
Oct 2012

Remember how the Right created the term "political correctness" in the 1980s to mean anything educated (i.e., liberal) people said that they disagreed with? And remember that it took years before the corporate media actually considered the meaning of their political dog whistle? Well, now let's see how long it takes before the corporate electronic media dare to ask what Mitt's gibberish means. Perhaps a better question is: "Why do these people hate government -- or at least democratic government so badly? Could it be that besides hating the redistribution of "wealth", what they really fear is the democratic redistribution of their power and privilege, to average working citizens i.e., the democratic transformation of America?

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
16. Can there be an effective government that isn't "trickle-down"?
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 07:54 PM
Oct 2012

It seems to me that it's the essence of government. Government takes in large amounts of general revenue and then targets it to specific uses, from farm subsidies to defense. If you're against the trickling down of tax revenue to the people then maybe you're an extremist libertarian who's against public roads and public armies and wants everything to be privatized. It seems to me that government by nature involves a trickle down redistribution of tax revenue. If you're against that, you're against government itself.

22. It means it is working as designed
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:47 PM
Oct 2012

A government created of the people, for the people, and by the people should in fact be a trickle down government, otherwise why have it.

Response to Angry Dragon (Reply #24)

38. Possible
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 08:22 AM
Oct 2012

I thought this was a discussion group which supported most Democrat policies and were against most GOP policies. If so, then why would we run from a phrase such as "trickle down government" just because it was supposed to be a "zinger" from R"money" (sic). Every once in a while some people accidentally say something intelligent. I'm sure his group hopes the idea that we DO have a trickle down government, that it was in fact planned that way, does not catch on. We do elect our representatives, to serve as our voices and do our bidding, and to insure that the people are cared for above all else. Now, if I''m in the wrong place I can easily leave.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,334 posts)
41. You need to look up and understand what "trickle down" means as it pertains to government:
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:05 AM
Oct 2012

Trickle down economics is Reaganomics is Romneyomics.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trickle-down_economics
"Trickle-down economics" and "the trickle-down theory" are terms in United States politics to refer to the idea that tax breaks or other economic benefits provided by government to businesses and the wealthy will benefit poorer members of society by improving the economy as a whole.[1] The term has been attributed to humorist Will Rogers, who said during the Great Depression that "money was all appropriated for the top in hopes that it would trickle down to the needy."[2] The term is mostly used ironically or as pejorative.[3]

Proponents of tax cuts often claim that savings and investment are essential to the economy, and thus less taxes (for any and all income brackets) need not harm any other income bracket. It has often been referred to as a straw-man argument.[4] Economist George Reisman, a proponent of tax cuts, said the following: "Of course, many people will characterize the line of argument I have just given as the 'trickle-down' theory. There is nothing trickle-down about it. There is only the fact that capital accumulation and economic progress depend on saving and innovation and that these in turn depend on the freedom to make high profits and accumulate great wealth. The only alternative to improvement for all, through economic progress, achieved in this way, is the futile attempt of some men to gain at the expense of others by means of looting and plundering. This, the loot-and-plunder theory, is the alternative advocated by the critics of the misnamed trickle-down theory."[5]

Today, "trickle-down economics" is most closely identified with the economic policies known as Reaganomics or laissez-faire. David Stockman, who as Reagan's budget director championed these cuts at first but then became skeptical of them, told journalist William Greider that the term "supply-side economics" was used to promote a trickle-down idea.[6]

Angry Dragon

(36,693 posts)
42. Government should flow and not trickle down
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:34 AM
Oct 2012

The republicans have promoted trickle down economics for over thirty years and it has not worked. Promoting government to trickle down would have the same effect.

It would be best if you explained your statement a little more.
Thank you

malaise

(269,123 posts)
23. No meaning - it's Orwellian to confuse the ignorant
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:54 PM
Oct 2012

because he is associated with Friedman's neo-liberal sit aka trickle down economics.

Fugg Rmoney!

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
27. It's a Repuke idea
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:07 PM
Oct 2012

Mostly heard during St.Ronnie's term. It means give the rich tax breaks, and the money the rich save, they will trickle it down to us peons. And now Rmoney is pushing it on Obama.

Short and simple: Trickle down= piss on peons while telling them it's raining.

unblock

(52,285 posts)
29. it's what a bully says back when he doesn't understand your insult.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:44 PM
Oct 2012

oh YEAH?

trickle-down eca ... ecamonicks?

well, uh, uh, that stuff you like, it's, uh, TRICKLE-DOWN GOVERNMENT, that's what it is!

so THERE!

and so's your MOTHER!

NashvilleLefty

(811 posts)
31. It means we're winning. It's psy-ops.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:57 PM
Oct 2012

"Trickle-down economics" was such a terrible failure Regan changed the name to "Supply-Side Economics" just to avoid the association. The term itself has such a bad connotation that Romney tried to tie it to Obama's Keynesian economics, just to put a "bad taste" in everyone's mouths.

It has no real meaning. It's psy-ops.

newspeak

(4,847 posts)
44. yeah, and they've been shoveling it down our throat for over thirty fekkin years
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 12:33 PM
Oct 2012

who says it doesn't work. If you want to bust up labor, get rid of regulations, and empower the wealthy, including global corporations-it's worked just fine. The disparity today between us and the have mores, has obscenely grown.

and WS, for the most part, has become nothing more than one big casino, gambling on our misery. and speaking of WS, did we ever find out who did the put options on the airlines before 9/11?

HillWilliam

(3,310 posts)
32. The new national motto will be
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:07 PM
Oct 2012

Cavete Cadens Defricatus Urina!

because you know the teabillies wouldn't stand for no Frenchified Guardez L'Eau

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
33. If the 1% didn't profit from the trickle-down government....
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:11 PM
Oct 2012

they would all go bankrupt in less than two weeks.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
34. It's code for "We're going to completely fuck you over and there is nothing you can do about it."
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:29 PM
Oct 2012

Bwahaahahahahahhahah. Miserable Bastards.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
39. Same thing as trickle down economics.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 08:25 AM
Oct 2012

those of us at the bottom will only get something warm, wet, and yellow.

stlsaxman

(9,236 posts)
40. it was the easiest thing Romney could remember. it means nothing.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 08:27 AM
Oct 2012

probably the only phrase that wasn't on his notes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What the hell does "...