General Discussion

timber84

(2,876 posts) Thu Oct 4, 2012, 01:40 PM Oct 2012

Someone please post the "Chill the Fuck Out" pic.

Jesus. Relax. It was one night. He's got this ok.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Someone please post the "Chill the Fuck Out" pic. (Original Post) timber84 Oct 2012 OP

Here ya go MgtPA Oct 2012 #1

Thanks, I needed that! liberal N proud Oct 2012 #2

Aww BumRushDaShow Oct 2012 #4

Response in only 4 minutes! JaneQPublic Oct 2012 #5

THANK YOU !!!!!!!! timber84 Oct 2012 #7

This one? hootinholler Oct 2012 #3

Oh for Christ's sake, No. COLGATE4 Oct 2012 #6

MgtPA

(1,022 posts)

1. Here ya go

Reply to timber84 (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2012, 01:44 PM

Oct 2012

liberal N proud

(60,339 posts)

2. Thanks, I needed that!

Reply to MgtPA (Reply #1)

Thu Oct 4, 2012, 01:44 PM

Oct 2012

BumRushDaShow

(129,322 posts)

4. Aww

Reply to liberal N proud (Reply #2)

Thu Oct 4, 2012, 01:46 PM

Oct 2012

JaneQPublic

(7,113 posts)

5. Response in only 4 minutes!

Reply to MgtPA (Reply #1)

Thu Oct 4, 2012, 01:46 PM

Oct 2012

timber84

(2,876 posts)

7. THANK YOU !!!!!!!!

Reply to MgtPA (Reply #1)

Thu Oct 4, 2012, 02:20 PM

Oct 2012

DU needed that.

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)

3. This one?

Reply to timber84 (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2012, 01:45 PM

Oct 2012

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)

6. Oh for Christ's sake, No.

Reply to timber84 (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2012, 02:08 PM

Oct 2012

He looked bad, unprepared, unsure of himself, diffident and without much energy. In one fell swoop he's managed to re-energize the Rethuglican hordes who were becoming so discouraged that possibly many of them wouldn't have bothered to vote. He's sure to re-attract many large $$ donors so that he can continue to carpet bomb swing states with more lies, just at a time when many were sidling towards the door. No, he doesn't "have it", at least not now. Let's hope that his second performance is one hell of a lot different than this one or I think we may be in serious trouble.

Reply to this discussion