Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marked50

(1,366 posts)
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 10:13 AM Oct 2012

Manipulation?

One observation that my wife and I have not seen any comment on is that the first three topics of debate (the economy) were in Romney’s favorite territory and Obama’s least successful. Obama came out having to play defense against his opponent who gave new meaning to the term, “ ‘bully’ pulpit”.

The fact that there were no topics or questions about Obama’s stronger policies (women’s issues, immigration, education, gay rights, etc.,) has me wondering if some kind of backroom deal was struck to boost Romney’s favorability and/or to assure that ad money flowing to the media wouldn’t drop off due to one candidate’s overwhelming poll numbers. Wonder how the Obama campaign could have let that happen.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Manipulation? (Original Post) marked50 Oct 2012 OP
Did not consider that. Good points. Whovian Oct 2012 #1
I thought the candidates or the campaigns had no control over the actual questions? nc4bo Oct 2012 #2

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
2. I thought the candidates or the campaigns had no control over the actual questions?
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 10:16 AM
Oct 2012
I'll wait to see who knows the answer.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Manipulation?