General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumshow do you debate someone who changes their positions at whim?
it's virtually impossible. you have done your prep based on their campaigning
Incitatus
(5,317 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)0rganism
(23,962 posts)"5 minutes ago, you were for chihuahua subsidies to responsible pet owners, now you're against them. Are you planning to back them again within the next hour? Why not tell the American people what you really believe?"
renate
(13,776 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,426 posts)joshcryer
(62,276 posts)They cannot be allowed to get away with their lies. Call them on it, because if you let it go, then it becomes a kind of "truth."
kiranon
(1,727 posts)whatever time period works, you have taken at least 3/4 different positions on the point in question not counting your new position taken here tonight at this debate. Which of the 5 positions should the voters rely on since you put forth 5 contradictory ones to suit whatever audience was in front of you. My positions are clear and consistent and as for the position you just enunciated - it is totally unworkable, ineffective, unrealistic, fiscally unsound, ridiculous, anti this or that - take your pick - use whatever term works at that moment but do not let Romney get away with his ever shifting positions. Or say, I admire a shape shifter as much as the next person when it deals with science fiction but it won't work for the President of the United States to have ever shifting positions on all things foreign and domestic.
Lady Freedom Returns
(14,120 posts)He can't find where he stands anywhere. And it seems that with Obama-care, he is made that it wasn't bipartisan. But the model was after Romney-care. How much more bipartisan can you get?