Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(59,406 posts)
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 02:01 PM Oct 2012

U.Va. analysis: Obama has already won

The team of Larry Sabato, Kyle Kondik and Geoffrey Skelley said if the election were held today, Obama would win 290 Electoral Votes, Mitt Romney 204. And the 42 toss-up Electoral Votes would not be enough to help Romney even if he took them all.

Theirs is the first to essentially declare Obama the winner and it comes after they switched several battleground states from toss-up to leaning Democrat, including Virginia, Wisconsin, Ohio, Iowa and Nevada. The change mirrors new polling in those states and caps a two-week trend favoring Obama in state polls.

They caution that there are a few hurdles yet for Obama to clear, including the upcoming trio of presidential debates and continued bad economic reports. But they said those problems were only "theoretical" and concluded that "caution is always in order with almost six weeks to go, yet President Obama clearly leads at the moment."

What's more, with Obama's improving fortune is the likelihood he will have coattails for House and Senate candidates to grab onto. According to the new U.Va. analysis, the Senate looks to stay in Democratic hands and House Democrats will claw closer to control, but likely not win it.


http://washingtonexaminer.com/u.va.-analysis-obama-has-already-won/article/2509180#.UGx84H2UAqY

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

TBF

(32,109 posts)
1. Larry's usually spot on and I think he is this time as well -
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 02:02 PM
Oct 2012

People just plain don't like Romney. Hardcore repugs will vote for him but he's so abrasive. That just does not play well with moderates.

eissa

(4,238 posts)
3. Ugh, I don't like this
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 02:06 PM
Oct 2012

I'm sorry, I hate playing the role of Debbie Downer, but I just hate this "we have it in the bag" meme. Maybe it's because I was just as confident in '04, and I NEVER want to have that feeling that I did the day after that election. The election is not today, it's a month away, which can be a lifetime in an election cycle. So much could happen between now and November, let's keep our guard up.

Response to RandySF (Original post)

oswaldactedalone

(3,491 posts)
7. Regardless of Obama's standing as of today
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 02:29 PM
Oct 2012

keep donating, registering voters, answering any questions they have, getting them to their polling place, anything you can to help down ticket races. Also, winning some of these toss-up states adds to the narrative that Obama's win can't be called illegitimate or stolen.

We have to crush these maggots once and for all.

nichomachus

(12,754 posts)
11. The problem, of course, is that election is not going to be held today
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 03:12 PM
Oct 2012

These types of analyses are always stupid.

In politics, as the saying goes, a week is an eternity. And the corporate media has shown that it can create any reality it wants in about three weeks. There are five weeks between now and the election.

If the 2004 Democratic primary had been held in December 2003, Howard Dean would have been the undisputed winner. He was the "unbeatable front runner." By the middle of January he was declared "unelectable."

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,716 posts)
12. I Agree That The Predictions Are Good For The Day They Are Made
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 03:15 PM
Oct 2012

But presidential preferences are much more fixed at this point of a presidential election.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.Va. analysis: Obama has...