Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Laurian

(2,593 posts)
1. Because he's not been seen much lately.
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 07:57 AM
Oct 2012

The more he's seen, the less he's liked. Once he comes out from debate prep, he'll do or say something stupid to remind people that he's a big zero.

DainBramaged

(39,191 posts)
2. Have you ever really looked at RCP? At the front page ads? At the commentary?
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 07:59 AM
Oct 2012

Just askin'.







Illustrating the Tax Code's Progressivity
The folks at the Tax Foundation are concerned that the recent increase in talk about inequality will create a soak-the-rich atmosphere that will forestall tax reform that doesn't include


http://www.realclearpolicy.com/data_lab/2012/09/25/illustrating_the_tax_codes_progressivity_293.html

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
3. not in the swing states, Obama is getting a bigger and bigger lead in the individual
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 08:01 AM
Oct 2012

and on MSNBC, even rightwing synchopant Joe Scarborough said, all the state polls including internal polls in states Mitt needs to win (like Ohio and Iowa) are major changes.

Obama in Ohio alone is up from 45-45 in late august to a nine point lead today in Ohio(without which Mitt cannot get 270.)

nationwide polls are meaningless because Obama can lose Kansas 100-0 and win NY by one vote and win the election as it is the individual 270 count.

(and some of these polls include rasmussen in the national average, skewering the whole number.)

and Obama is in most of the states now over 50, and no matter how many undecideds, once someone is over 50, the other cannot win.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
17. I love that map
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 10:27 AM
Oct 2012

I've always seen idiot right-wingers claim that since technically more landspace is red that somehow they are the rightful party.

What idiots

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
8. No he's not.
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 08:35 AM
Oct 2012

A couple of polls that showed Romney ahead a couple of months ago came in and dropped the average .4 points.

The Politico/GWU/Battleground and the WaPo/ABC poll now have the President up by 2 points.



http://www.politico.com/polls/politico-george-washington-university-battleground-poll.html

WaPo/ABC poll: Obama up 2 points nationally, up 11 points among swing-state voters
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021444351

The average showed the President up by 4.1 points yesterday, and after those two polls it's 3.7 points.


CanonRay

(14,103 posts)
9. I don't see it, Romney's sinking in every swing state
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 08:55 AM
Oct 2012

Getting 92% in Idaho aint' gonna cut it for Mitt.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
20. I have been there twice this morning and this is what I saw
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 11:31 AM
Oct 2012

Nate Silver said if the Presidential race were a football game, we have been in the fourth quarter for some time now. Romney is down a touchdown.

Current electoral college prediction: 320.1 versus 217.9 (advantage Obama)
Chance of winning: 85.1% versus 14.9% (advantage Obama)
Popular vote: 51.6 versus 47.4 (advantage Obama)

Important predictions key swing states:

Florida: 70.3 chance of an Obama win
Ohio: 86.1 chance of an Obama win
Virginia: 77.6 chance of an Obama win
Pennsylvania: 97.5 chance of an Obama win

My personal favorites:

Michigan: 97.4 chance of an Obama win
Wisconsin: 90.2 chance of an Obama win (once again, thanks Paul Ryan)

I personally do not see how even the debates will change anything. For me personally, if Romney came out with 50 zingers, 1 bombshell accusation against Obama, and performed a miracle by raising someone from the dead, I still would not vote for him!

Sam

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
15. Have you looked at RCP's electoral map?
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 10:20 AM
Oct 2012

They have most of the swing states that are polling for Obama as tossups, including Nevada, Virginia, Florida and Iowa. Look here: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com

and look at the state by state polling in the sidebar and the probablities. Nate Silver got 49 out of 50 right last time; I wouldn't be betting against his numbers being as close to an accurate representation of the state of the race as we have.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
16. Are you basing this on National Popularity or Electoral VOtes
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 10:25 AM
Oct 2012

Because according to EV we're pretty safe in about 250 EV and strong in another 60 EV which puts us way ahead of the 270 we need.

Last time an election was decided on the popularity vote was 2000 and that was a popularity vote from 9 people.

fugop

(1,828 posts)
18. Popular vs electoral
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 10:34 AM
Oct 2012

I really find myself wondering if this will be the year when the popular vs electoral issue blows up. Yes, it happened in 2000, but it was so close that it got glossed over ultimately. But the southern and racist vote ... I find myself wondering if the crazy anti-Obama vote comes out huge in those states and wins Romney the popular vote. As another poster noted, what if Romney racks up ridiculous margins in the South and Kansas, whi h were already red, while Obama wins by closer margins in every swing state?

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
19. Real Clear Politics has hundreds of polls on its site. You have to be more specific.
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 10:36 AM
Oct 2012

Are you talking about the general election generic numbers of the whole country? Swing state average? A specific swing state?

Need more specifics to understand what you mean.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Romney is moving up in th...