General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsseabeyond
(110,159 posts)something more plain. it made it too much.
arthritisR_US
(7,290 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)brush
(53,801 posts)Last edited Sun Sep 30, 2012, 05:42 PM - Edit history (1)
The outfit is inappropriate on so many levels, with "age" being the most obvious. Ann, you've been around the block enough times to know to pass up the biker fashion boutique.
gulliver
(13,186 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)Yo Ann, you're never going to be 15 again LOL
patrice
(47,992 posts)super-sentimentalized paintings on black velvet.
movonne
(9,623 posts)shoes would be great...
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)judging her fashion sense are total fashion disasters, PS ho9pe you are well ya nutter
trueblue2007
(17,232 posts)my friends... i think this looks SLUTTY.
I would never wear that.
i am about her size, and her age.
I DRESS BETTER THAN SHE DOES.
THIS OUTFIT GETS AN "F"
Waltons_Mtn
(345 posts)My god we can see her knee!!! Snarch!!
arthritisR_US
(7,290 posts)Waltons_Mtn
(345 posts)appleannie1
(5,068 posts)arthritisR_US
(7,290 posts)Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)Maybe that was her motivation.
goclark
(30,404 posts)Her problem is that she is NO WAY going to upstage Michelle!
Michelle has style and grace and a sincere smile that lights up the world.
This B.... is evil with every step she takes, it doesn't matter what she wears, she is hateful and self centered.
gateley
(62,683 posts)tblue37
(65,457 posts)of some of Michelles outfits, I am sometimes stunned by how klutzy and ill-fitting other ones are. In terms of style, she often hits it right on the nose, but sometimes misses by a mile. Fortunately, though, Michelle is so charming and classy in herself that even her fashion misses do not detract from her overall charm and appeal.
Ann, on the other hand, is not a charming or appealing person, so her fashion misses seem much more damaging. In general, I think her hair is her best feature. It usually looks sleek and attractive, as well as entirely suited to her face, her age, and her position.
But her clothing choices are often often simply weird. I think this outfit is cute in its own way, and would be attractive on a younger woman, but I do think it is over the top for both Anns age and her position.
As for the shoes, I think they are very cute, but they dont really go well with that outfit, and especially they do not suit Anns age or status.
I assume she was trying to prove that she and her husband Money Boo Boo are cool and can "kick it with the young, hip crowd." They have been told that they seem stiff and unrelatable to most American voters, so she is trying to come across as more relatable with this outfit. Unfortunately, though she is trying too hard, and it shows.
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)a couple of outfits that made me wonder "What the hell was she thinking?"
Same thing goes for Mrs. Obama. I once saw her in a photo with the first ladies of France and Italy - Mrs. Obama looked as though she was trying to mimic Snow White!
Nine hundred ninety-nine times out of a thousand, Mrs. Obama dresses fantastically.......but that one time? Damn........
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)tanyev
(42,589 posts)BlueToTheBone
(3,747 posts)I think this outfit was too much. Certainly as a suit it was too much especially for her age, plus those shoes were WAY overboard. She's not supposed to be telegraphing "I'm Sexy!" with her clothing if she's going for First Lady. I would have gone plain, plain, plain: simple black top and either simple at her age and standing, but still with plenty of "Wow-factor." ONE statement piece at a time, especially with the leather and the laser-cut "lace" effect. And plain black slippers or even satin evening boots.
But all that stuff going on at once - WAY too much. It would only be appropriate if she were editor-in-chief of W or Vogue, instead of being a political wife in her 50's or early 60's who fancies herself living in the White House, NOT Trump Tower forcryingoutloud! She shouldn't be presenting herself as out there or trendoid, or allegedly "edgy" like this.
Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)flamingdem
(39,314 posts)magic leather underwear perhaps?
HillWilliam
(3,310 posts)That's the kind of thing someone might wear in a dungeon or a Fetish Expo, not a political campaign event.
Mitt, the daddy? Somehow I doubt that. Magic dydees perhaps.
Now I must hasten off for brain bleach. Perhaps total immersion for full effect.
onecent
(6,096 posts)those shoes are HIDEOUS but go well with THAT HORRID DRESS....BWAAAAAA
tanyev
(42,589 posts)In envy.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)I marvel at the level of snark that a pic like this can generate.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,336 posts)'Spew alert' seems such an over-reaction. I assumed this would be about something a woman (I guessed Ann Romney, at this stage) said, not wore (I assume this is about the clothes/shoes, since her hair doesn't look different from before).
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Double bubble, boil and trouble.
Waltons_Mtn
(345 posts)flamingdem
(39,314 posts)Tyrs WolfDaemon
(2,289 posts)But she looked at a recent pic of Newt and decided she already had it better than Callista.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)avebury
(10,952 posts)compliments her legs at all. She looks like a Madonna wanna be and definitely not First Lady material. The shoes are just plain trashy. It looks like she is trying to dress like a teenager.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)seriously
on edit: and Silver Glitter nail polish!
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)They are just wrong for this dress. The shoes would look fine with a plain little black dress.
avebury
(10,952 posts)Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)This outfit is so unbecoming to a woman her age...
mucifer
(23,557 posts)at people criticizing Hilary Clinton in the way she dressed and the way she talked and it's just petty and stupid in my book. Maybe this thread is more appropriate in the lounge.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)(as I stated down thread) ... there is so much associated with this woman and her family to be offended by .... why focus on something this irrelevant?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)There are so many SUBSTANTIAL reasons to detest this arrogant, out of touch 1%er. I'll pass on the fashion snark, it's juvenile.
DavidDvorkin
(19,480 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)100%
C_U_L8R
(45,012 posts)But that big honking Rolex is the ugliest part
Warpy
(111,305 posts)I shudder to think how much she paid for that. There is entirely too much going on, the skirt is the wrong length and those shoes are hideous with it.
One of the main criticisms of Mitt is that he changes his policy plans every 5 minutes, that he doesn't know who he really is and we don't, either. This and the leatherette biker suit she wore on Leno suggest that his wife doesn't, either.
goclark
(30,404 posts)she is trying to attract a richer Younger man from her church.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Mitt is installing, WWII pilots wore leather to fight off the cold and wind.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Take away that sparkley stuff at the neckline.
Just because a woman is middle aged doesn't mean you have to wear dumpy clothing.
Chorophyll
(5,179 posts)And honestly, she looks pretty good. (On the outside.) She's a vile person.
Hutzpa
(11,461 posts)nt
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)I am sickened by her lack of graciousness and the absence of gratitude for how much life has given her an her family.
The outfit, however, is reasonably flattering ... it is not my specific taste (far too much embellishment) ... but she does not look bad (she looks kinda nice and if she were a democrat, we would probably be positive about the look). I could understand being disgusted by the (potential) cost of the outfit ...
There is so much 'bad" associated with this woman and her family ... why focus on something this shallow ....? There are very real spew worthy things associated with this woman.
Mad_Dem_X
(9,565 posts)Those shoes are not First Lady material.
originalpckelly
(24,382 posts)hatrack
(59,590 posts)But I couldn't help noticing that her tritium laser sight gaze is just as gentle as it ever was, and that her face remains unchanged, sculpted as it is from industrial diamonds.
tibbiit
(1,601 posts)They hoped to add some Palin spark.
tib
Freddie
(9,269 posts)Although the shoes are a bit much and she can't quite get away with the bare-leg look. The dress is flattering to her very nice figure and as a female I'm jealous (always a bit too "hippy" to wear a cut like that even in my younger thinner days).
A bit too tight and short for the magic underwear? Many Mormons are speculating!
But not a First Lady dress. Wonder what the lady on NPR who said Michelle "dosen't look like a first lady" thinks of that.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)And I remember back to Ike and Mamie. And those shoes are just reprehensible -- they're on a par with that sickening bird shirt. I for one don't believe a stylist did that, it's 'her', it has the look of her other outfits. I saw a pic of her and Mitt in HS in 1966 and her dress looked like something a dog barfed up in that one too. I'm roughly their age, so I know what 'good' looked like at that time, and what she wore was nowhere close. Money can't buy taste, that's for sure!
tblue37
(65,457 posts)Last edited Sat Sep 29, 2012, 06:06 PM - Edit history (1)
suits in vivid day-glo or electric shades were much worse. The colors, the cuts, the fabrics, and the fit were always painful to look at.
With her fair complexion and very blonde hair, Cindy always looked much better when she wore softer shades of blue, green, pink, or rose or neutral colors like black, white, grey, beige, or tanbut she seemed toprefer brilliant hues. Vivid reds and oranges are actually my favorite colors, even for clothes, but on her they were simply too much, especially since she would wear an entire outfit in one overwhelmingly brilliant or electric color, rather than breaking the color up or just using it as an accent to energize an outfit in a softer color.
Here are links to some of the other ones that hurt my eyes:
http://tinyurl.com/94y6n9h
http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQY14tUw6DhbD3_uUAXJN9d3nQJfkoT8a8dPsp_EwfL3jJm8I4dZQ
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS1u1yfGUTyYPfcKLGPFf0E7DofxP7dAnDBWpNXYkP3v4jD2Ncv7g
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRh2D-0VbjlfGbtp9LsedRJs-C9c-RGx7FvNeB4owfxsFVxPC15N1KVRQFP
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRh2D-0VbjlfGbtp9LsedRJs-C9c-RGx7FvNeB4owfxsFVxPC15N1KVRQFP
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRxs68wDiP_zEcXL-XZhejM9Px8vaGkfiRAQQhTjne7UHQXuyuraqaZmyBT
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)Way too bright for my eyes.
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)Very good.
flamingdem
(39,314 posts)her family had disowned her!
JohnnyLib2
(11,212 posts)I like it!
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)DearAbby
(12,461 posts)Tikki
(14,559 posts)meh...for sure.
Tikki
shanti
(21,675 posts)what are those silver thingies?
BooScout
(10,406 posts)HATE the shoes though.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)waaaay over the top.
Each piece, in and of itself, would be ok by itself. The top a bit much, but with a plain black skirt and simpler shoes, fine. The skirt by itself a bit much, but with a plain silk top and simpler shoes, fine. The shoes with a plain black dress, ok.
All together, at once? It's like green plaid with red bubbles and purple stripes together. It's just all too much. And it's all too shiny.
And her legs are waaaay too old looking for that much attention drawn to them.
I'm sure she thinks she looks hip and young and kewl, or something. Just another FAIL.
And since the GOP has seen fit to attack Michelle's beautiful look since day 1, not to mention claim Michelle just doesn't "look" like a 1st lady, Ann's appearance is fair game, imho.
flamingdem
(39,314 posts)She needed less pronounced shoes to pull this off and neutral nail polish pleease
cali
(114,904 posts)but I don't get this kind of shit at all.
DU little gossipites loved to accuse Laura Bush of being dowdy and now here we are with Ann Romney.
I despise this kind of petty catty stereotypical female behavior.
tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)Siwsan
(26,281 posts)And, those really are some ugly shoes.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
Turborama
(22,109 posts)Or photoshopped?
Whatever the case, those tats don't look like real ones. More like the tranfer 'lick and press' ones for kids.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)Durn tootin'.
--imm
BlueToTheBone
(3,747 posts)Yikes! That hurt my eyes.
patrice
(47,992 posts)the shoes look cheap and trashy and besides that they are ugly.
kittykitty
(1,091 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)ugh
K8-EEE
(15,667 posts)However the Freepers are probably gaga over that right purdy Ann Romney in her fancy biker gear and that was probably the point of this thing!
patrice
(47,992 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)With high heeled slippers, and Mitts watch.
sellitman
(11,607 posts)With all the negatives her husband has does DU need to resort to clothing criteria posts for the would be 1st lady?
I find it disgusting when the right does it to Michelle and its just as shabby when we do it to Mitt's wife.
Grow up. This post doesn't even belong in the lounge.
MiddleFingerMom
(25,163 posts)LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)There's nothing wrong with the outfit. It's cute and it looks good on her- certainly better than the too-bright red trainwreck she wore at the RNC.
Retrograde
(10,142 posts)Mormon goth. But overall, better than the getup she wore on the clip on the Daily Show (a mostly red dress with various colored streaks. Or was it white with mostly red streaks? I have a shirt with a similar look - I've been wearing it while painting)
And yes, I've criticized Michelle Obama's outfits at times: still don't like the full skirts with the 3/4-sleeve sweaters that make her look cut in half.
ETA: and too shiny for TV imho: it draws one's focus.
jackbenimble
(251 posts)And it looks nothing like biker chic to me. But the shoes are all wrong. If nothing else was available then just some plain black pumps would have looked better. The shoes also make it appear she has thick ankles. I usually don't criticize the way women who are public figures dress, or their appearance, because I think we all have our own style and it is a little petty really. But, since this gal seems to think it's okay for her to criticize others I thought I would chime in with my opinion of her choices this time around.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)REP
(21,691 posts)If I had legs like that, I wouldn't be comfortable in that outfit. I'd prefer something more flattering.
begin_within
(21,551 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)It's what's on the inside that makes me want to hurl.
pitchforksandtorches
(338 posts)Peregrine Took
(7,416 posts)so much better! With stiletto's
If you want to go for it - do it all the way.
Not this namby pamby look of sweet and saucy.
appleannie1
(5,068 posts)flyguyjake
(492 posts)and she is a Witch... just sayin...
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)She is the lead on this week's Yahoo!/OMG! ""What were they thinking?!"
http://omg.yahoo.com/photos/what-were-they-thinking-09-28-slideshow/
I agree with that sentiment. The outfit is hideous, and I'd say that even if Michelle Obama was wearing it. The shoes are okay--for a 20-something out on a date. And, the Michelle-copycat gray nail polish makes it look like she smashed her fingers. It worked with Michelle, because of her skin tone, and the pink and gray dress she wore for that convention speech. Here, it just looks like she has bruised nail beds.
ElboRuum
(4,717 posts)Makes her look like she's got a thorax.
flamingdem
(39,314 posts)for a conservative with NO taste!
annabanana
(52,791 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)The shoes don't match the outfit, but I love those shoes.
flamingdem
(39,314 posts)of her outfit.
It was on yahoo and many other sites.
STOP IT THIS IS HARD
GreenPartyVoter
(72,381 posts)rate she wears it better than I would so I can't say much.
I do think it's fine to wear a fun outfit to a late night show. This is not high tea with international leaders or anything.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Even if we hate the material and everything.
1. The buttons on the jacket have to go. The whole thing is too busy as it is.
2. The jewelry has to go. Same reason.
3. The shoes are terrible. Replace them with a high pump that elongates the leg. No strap to bisect that line of the leg. Stockings!!!
4. A nice coral for the nails and lips.
5. If the sleeves are 3/4 length then try them down instead of pushed up. The outfit has the feel of a late 50s, early 60s sort and if so the 3/4 sleeve complemented it.
Nothing we can do about the skirt length. Pity it doesn't hit at mid-knee.
Once all the changes are made then she could experiment with a single bracelet that matches her nails and a matching necklace - that hangs and doesn't stay up around her neck. Thin coral.
I don't like the outfit personally. It's too busy. I don't like leather and I don't like layers and I don't like the lacy stuff. But the cut is good. It could be made to be more attractive than it is with some changes and she would have looked much nicer. I believe she must have been advised by a much younger person. Or her husband. Mine has talked me into things before when I knew better. Like 6-inch heels.
I just tried this as a fashion exercise. Kinda fun.
sammytko
(2,480 posts)Retrograde
(10,142 posts)(Is that kind enough?) Prints are not her friend, nor are froo-froo getups. There's one picture where she seems to have a sincere smile - she's very attractive in that one.
sammytko
(2,480 posts)And you are right, prints are not for her. She looks good in a strong blue.
cr8tvlde
(1,185 posts)XemaSab
(60,212 posts)Her husband's the walking dead anyways.
sweetpea7788
(12 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)wore black.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Was she insufficiently modest?
Or is her body communal property?
onethatcares
(16,177 posts)with the jack her husband makes she should go for some lazer hair removal on the legs.
Those razor nicks look hurtful.
dsc
(52,164 posts)and I admit I wouldn't look as good in the male equivalent.
FloridaJudy
(9,465 posts)"I paid a fucking fortune for all this plastic surgery, and by God, I want my money's worth!"
She's not that unattractive, if you can ignore her personality (and her DH's). And no particular piece of that outfit is too outrageous. It's the total package that fails. My mother would have told her to take off at least half of those accessories.
But what would I know? I even thought Sarah Palin was kind of cute, in a "naughty librarian" way. Until she opened her mouth and revealed one of the ugliest brains in the world.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)This looks good on her, maybe the shoes were too much.
Sorry if I cannot get in the bandwagon of the other side can be gone after for dressing in a certain way.
Oh and yes, there is a mirror post at the mirror site, I am sure.
aletier_v
(1,773 posts)Iggo
(47,561 posts)Not the smartest choice for a wannabe First Lady. But we're not accusing her of being all that smart, are we?
ecstatic
(32,720 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Zalatix
(8,994 posts)I am not afraid to admit a woman* who looks and dresses like that is worth a nice long look (if you're single, and if she is). Plus I am all for First Ladies ditching the traditional dress. Fuck tradition, be adventurous! Break the shackles!
There's no emotional block against me admitting a woman can be stunningly beautiful and also the scum of the earth. This is one of those cases. If the Devil came up in female form she would look even better than this.
Anyone ever see that new (short-lived) "V" series? Yeah, that. She was as horrible a creature as they get and she was eye-poppingly gorgeous. Oh, snap, wait, that monster's name as ANNA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
* Note, I said a woman who looks and dresses like that. Not Ann Romney in particular.
FloridaJudy
(9,465 posts)That Ann Coulter consumes her partners after mating.
And am just grateful that she can't lay several thousand eggs as well.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)What's wrong with that? It looks Metal.
Capt.Rocky300
(1,005 posts)a little blue pill borrowed from Bob Dole, means a hot Saturday night for Mitt and Ann. Excuse me, I have to go now and poke out my mind's eye.
ann---
(1,933 posts)unbecoming, ugly dress and the shoes look like something a prostitute would wear. yuck.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)She's clearly going out of her way to look "scary foxy".
Remember this?
FloridaJudy
(9,465 posts)The boots are a bit much, but at least she matched them with something that didn't cry out for handcuffs as an accessory. A single daring choice doesn't make one look like a bad joke. Am I the only here old enough to remember Bella Abzug and her signature crazy hats?
As I've said, it's not the Republican women's fashion choices that disturb me: It's their way of thinking.
Except for Ann Coulter. In her case, I find both nauseating. Jeezuz, lady, how old are you? Don't you think it's time to dress like a grown-up, instead of like a middle school girl who's doing her best to look like a dominatrix?
Response to FloridaJudy (Reply #149)
Post removed
mrs_p
(3,014 posts)People should be able to wear what they want, IMHO.
mitchtv
(17,718 posts)There's a whole lot going on with that outfit, I think a bit too much for daytime .
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)Queen Ann looks better in something like this:
?1332353149
Solid, bright color and the material is better for her.
She needs a new stylist. These women rarely pick their own clothes so was it really her fault?
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)I know she's trying to be hip, but we all know they are pretty square
cali
(114,904 posts)their offensive, ugly knees.
Jesus. H. Christ.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)but knees especially on tv (and even more so on HD tv) are not all that attractive..
We all have knees, but most people in a high-profile situation on tv at least try to accentuate the positive ..
Going to the beach/pool or on vacation with family/friends is a LOT different from being the wannabee president's wife on tv.....
RFKHumphreyObama
(15,164 posts)I've seen some pretty awful pictures of her but this isn't one of them. She looks stunningly sexy here
Of course it is what is on the inside that counts and that is why she'll never be truly attractive to me
BlueToTheBone
(3,747 posts)Actually I like the looks of our real First Lady; who has class and style. Her deep natural beauty and attraction shine through without looking like a hooker.
lillypaddle
(9,581 posts)coldwaterintheface
(137 posts)Perhaps in her world that outfit is considered fashionable.
Catherine Vincent
(34,491 posts)Is this a typical outfit that she normally wears?
BlueToTheBone
(3,747 posts)OMG. Think Mittens would ruin us. Think on this. She would set the style of the nation and it makes my head hurt.