Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 03:12 AM Sep 2012

Mass. Chemist Faked Drug Tests, Thousands Wrongly Convicted.


http://news.yahoo.com/mass-chemist-drug-test-flap-arrested-160136833.html

A Massachusetts chemist accused of faking drug test results now finds herself in the same position as the accused drug dealers she testified against: charged with a crime and facing years in prison.

Annie Dookhan, 34, of Franklin, was arrested Friday in a burgeoning investigation that has already led to the shutdown of a state drug lab, the resignation of the state's public health commissioner and the potential upending of thousands of criminal cases.

"Annie Dookhan's alleged actions corrupted the integrity of the entire criminal justice system," state Attorney General Martha Coakley said during a news conference after Dookhan's arrest. "There are many victims as a result of this."

Dookhan faces more than 20 years in prison on charges of obstruction of justice and falsely pretending to hold a degree form a college or university.

Dookhan's alleged mishandling of drug samples prompted the shutdown of the Hinton State Laboratory Institute in Boston last month.

State police say Dookhan tested more than 60,000 drug samples involving 34,000 defendants during her nine years at the lab. Defense lawyers and prosecutors are scrambling to figure out how to deal with the fallout.


She also apparently lied under oath about having a degree.

I have to question a justice system where so many people could be convicted on the word of one person, whose integrity, credentials and procedures were apparently never checked over nine years.
53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mass. Chemist Faked Drug Tests, Thousands Wrongly Convicted. (Original Post) caseymoz Sep 2012 OP
I'm surprised they didn't have someone Confusious Sep 2012 #1
She was finishing 550 tests a month . . . caseymoz Sep 2012 #3
is it only *one* person who does drug tests for an entire state? HiPointDem Sep 2012 #6
Oh, F yea, a lot of turds to clean up Confusious Sep 2012 #9
I don't know about drug tests... harmonicon Sep 2012 #12
On one hand, you have a point Confusious Sep 2012 #14
Oh, these things could have landed a lot of people in prison... harmonicon Sep 2012 #15
Eleven hundred people, specifically...and they have an axe to grind. MADem Sep 2012 #28
I worked in an environmental testing lab glowing Sep 2012 #18
Retesting a random sampling at a different facility would be smart QC. Gormy Cuss Sep 2012 #38
what a colossal mess grasswire Sep 2012 #2
Are jails are filled with non violent B Calm Sep 2012 #4
It's a step worse if they're filled with non-offenders. caseymoz Sep 2012 #29
Like with other wars The Wizard Sep 2012 #5
Smedley would be rolling over in his grave at the privatization of the prison system to silvershadow Sep 2012 #7
You are right to question info. coming from our legal system... There is a huge divide between law midnight Sep 2012 #8
They have to release all of them Scairp Sep 2012 #10
It's Massachusetts. Stuff like this happens all the time. Mopar151 Sep 2012 #16
That kind of thing is hardly unique to Massachusetts. nt. Mariana Sep 2012 #20
Sadly, you are right. Does'nt make it good. nt Mopar151 Sep 2012 #22
Not even that. Just no one bothering to fully check a resume. TheMadMonk Sep 2012 #21
A lot of the real diplomas are meaningless. n./t Mopar151 Sep 2012 #23
Article doesn't say what was on her resume, caseymoz Sep 2012 #31
omg n/t orleans Sep 2012 #11
check out this one in Good Reads RainDog Sep 2012 #13
Yay, Drug War! Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #17
Well, fortunately our state voters decriminalized weed possession up to 2 ounces a couple years back bluestate10 Sep 2012 #26
Up to 1oz... not 2oz -..__... Sep 2012 #42
Bet she has links to the private prison scumbags n/t malaise Sep 2012 #19
More fun from the War on Drugs ck4829 Sep 2012 #24
The Massachusetts Crime Lab system is one of the state functions that bluestate10 Sep 2012 #25
That's what I've put together. caseymoz Sep 2012 #36
+1000 smirkymonkey Sep 2012 #44
Well, it's win-win. Scootaloo Sep 2012 #52
Who was paying her to do this? n/t porphyrian Sep 2012 #27
Anyone who can look at these facts and still support criminalized marijuana is Bluenorthwest Sep 2012 #30
I wonder if this affects a person's voting rights.... hmmmm. n/t 2on2u Sep 2012 #32
Oh gee, a convicted felon? Voting rights? But I bet gun rights go unaffected. lonestarnot Sep 2012 #33
Right on target..... so to speak!! n/t 2on2u Sep 2012 #37
You must be joking... right? -..__... Sep 2012 #43
Oooooo, the evil, evil New England. 2ndAmForComputers Sep 2012 #49
Romney appointee? Turbineguy Sep 2012 #34
Is any governor personally tasked with appointing individual lab chemists? hughee99 Sep 2012 #39
No but people Romney appointed hired her. Turbineguy Sep 2012 #47
She was hired by someone who worked for someone, hughee99 Sep 2012 #48
I see a VERY large class action suit .. 99Forever Sep 2012 #35
Thousands of lives damaged, thousands of dreams destroyed jsr Sep 2012 #40
All necessary losses to fight the war on drugs! ck4829 Sep 2012 #41
This happens quite a bit obamanut2012 Sep 2012 #45
Not checking credentials seems to be not that uncommon. dixiegrrrrl Sep 2012 #46
From a purely financial perspective ... Kennah Sep 2012 #50
It already is decriminalized here. n/t Cobalt Violet Sep 2012 #51
LIFE and a day minimum. obxhead Sep 2012 #53

Confusious

(8,317 posts)
1. I'm surprised they didn't have someone
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 03:16 AM
Sep 2012

Double check the results for something like this.

Seems it's a state Fup also.

The hard part would be finding which drug, and then once you had a positive, running a double check would, it seems to me, take less time?

Maybe I'm wrong on that?

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
3. She was finishing 550 tests a month . . .
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 03:34 AM
Sep 2012

. . . when others averaged between 100-150. That should have been a red flag right there. Instead, the Department seemed to favor her "productivity"!

Apparently, they had so many tests to do that management decisions were made on the basis of efficiency. Double-checking adds to costs and isn't efficient.

So, apparently they have a lot of cost and inefficiency to clean up now.

harmonicon

(12,008 posts)
12. I don't know about drug tests...
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 05:14 AM
Sep 2012

but I used to work at a lab that did other kinds of tests (soil, water, factory run-offs, etc.), and we were the only lab in the state apart from the government lab that could handle a lot of what we did. Despite the existence of the state lab, the state and some surrounding states were clients. If these were specialized tests, I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't reasonable to have them done by two different places (if anything seemed especially anomalous at my lab, it would get run again).

Isn't not having to do things twice part of what you're paying for when you have qualified professionals do something?

Confusious

(8,317 posts)
14. On one hand, you have a point
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 05:48 AM
Sep 2012

On the other, you're putting someone in prison.

Some things, like water tests, get run all the time.

Blood tests are going to be one time, and may send someone to jail for a very long time.


I guess I just like the backup when things are mission critical, to use a worn out phrase.

harmonicon

(12,008 posts)
15. Oh, these things could have landed a lot of people in prison...
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 06:01 AM
Sep 2012

but probably not as immediately.

I do agree with you about the importance of this. This story is a real tragedy. I was just trying to give you a semi-informed answer to your question about double testing.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
28. Eleven hundred people, specifically...and they have an axe to grind.
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 10:39 AM
Sep 2012

It looks like there will be consequences--the woman is out on bail now, but the governor on down have weighed in on this.

She's been at this for a long, long time. It will reverberate for years, I'm guessing.

 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
18. I worked in an environmental testing lab
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 06:20 AM
Sep 2012

and certain projects did have to have 2 different certified lab tests. On top of that, we had certify our lab every year with a state sample run of known quantities to make sure our analysis was correct and machines were properly calibrated. An off test, and we would get shut down. The best way for us to handle the samples was to pretend it was another job.

Not let anyone know it was a test sample; so they didn't feel the pressure and do something dumb. As a lab manager, I would know and kept an eye on what was processing and what the techs were doing, but pretended it was an important client and was "hot". Didn't seem as weird if I was helping process then.

On the other hand, I did find some really fast ways to increase productivity, receive great results, but skew the method just a tad bit.

I'm no longer in the chemical slew and crap we were testing. I was getting a toxic overload.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
38. Retesting a random sampling at a different facility would be smart QC.
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 11:27 AM
Sep 2012

Even properly qualified professionals aren't a guarantee of quality work. Even in well run facilities things go wrong -an individual who likes to cut corners, malfunctioning equipment, inadequate lab controls, etc. happen.

The cost of quality control is minor compared to the cost of dealing with a mess like this one but more importantly, there is no way to correct the way sloppy or fraudulent results have affected people's lives.

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
29. It's a step worse if they're filled with non-offenders.
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 10:41 AM
Sep 2012

Innocent people who've committed no crime, nonviolent or otherwise.

The only thing that could be worse imaginably than that is arrest-and-sentence by quota, as they did in the Soviet Union during The Terror.

This stinks of the same sloppiness that so distinguished those cases, where innocence isn't even a consideration.

The Wizard

(12,545 posts)
5. Like with other wars
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 04:11 AM
Sep 2012

In the War on Drugs the first casualty is truth. Think of all the prison guards and prison construction amd law enforcement that cost the taxpayers billions.
"War is a Racket"
(General Smedley D. Butler, USMC, Retired)

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
7. Smedley would be rolling over in his grave at the privatization of the prison system to
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 04:42 AM
Sep 2012

a for-profit business. Add to that, marijuana wasn't even illegal until around 1930 (forget the year and details), but he would have been in his 50's when that happened. Wonder if he foresaw any of this?

midnight

(26,624 posts)
8. You are right to question info. coming from our legal system... There is a huge divide between law
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 04:47 AM
Sep 2012

and science... And in-between is a lot of money... Who pays for the science... Look at Monsanto Science...

Scairp

(2,749 posts)
10. They have to release all of them
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 04:55 AM
Sep 2012

Anyone ever sent to prison because of her perjury and laziness has to be set free. This is appalling. I do hope they can figure out a way to stop people like this. And she also got away with lying about having a degree and got this job anyway? That part I don't get, how did she ever get into a lab in the first place? Just mindboggling. Are LE so anxious to throw people in prison they will allow a con artist to make up evidence to do so? They are just as bad as she is.

Mopar151

(9,992 posts)
16. It's Massachusetts. Stuff like this happens all the time.
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 06:02 AM
Sep 2012

Political patronage is an art form, and much of state and local government is riddled with graft and corruption. There are so many "authourities" and "comissions" that it's hard to figure out who runs anything, or where any of the money goes. Hard work and integrity are for suckers.

 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
21. Not even that. Just no one bothering to fully check a resume.
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 07:50 AM
Sep 2012

Perhaps a photo with a couple of slightly out of focus diplomas in the background for window dressing.

You might be surprised at the number of mid to high level office denizens who lack some or even all of the credentials and/or experience they lay claim to.

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
31. Article doesn't say what was on her resume,
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 10:50 AM
Sep 2012

But in one case, she testified that she had a Masters of Chemistry degree from the University of Massachusetts, but she didn't. She might have put a different Chemistry degree on her resume, but judging by how she approached all these cases, they should check all of that.

Surprisingly, they haven't hit her for perjury, but I'm thinking they must be looking into that.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
13. check out this one in Good Reads
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 05:34 AM
Sep 2012
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101643159

How to Get Arrested Without Really Trying (or) Fuck the War on Drugs

September 21, 2012 - J. Bennett Rylah

Being arrested was on my bucket list. I assumed it would be for unpaid parking tickets, but hoped it would be for overturning a cop car at a protest. But I got arrested in a strange way, I suppose. Here’s how you too can go from being a working class professional and wind up a criminal without doing much.

WHEN A SWAT TEAM IS THE ONLY GUEST AT YOUR HOUSEWARMING PARTY

Dear, Penthouse. I was sitting on the couch in a pair of pink panties and a wifebeater. It was the third of May, but also unseasonably warm. My partner, Shawn, and I had recently started a labor-of-love blog about terrible motels called MurderMotels.com. The rule is you have to find a terrible motel using TripAdvisor or some other site and then force yourself to stay in it all night, save a little exploring of the city it’s in. I’d been eyeing one in the small town of Morley (Michigan’s trucking capital based on number of truckers in residence) for a while and tonight, we were going. Having watched too much Dexter, I’d ordered a supply of Luminol and was mixing it up in a small bottle.

It was mid-afternoon on a weekday. I was home because I work as the Managing Editor of a publication that specializes in news about urban revitalization, entrepreneurship and social justice. I’m an independent contractor, so I work from a lot of places that aren’t an office. But today, I was done with work. Shawn was on break from school. So, we were sort of relaxing. I had just moved into his place the night before. We were in love, I think. I was the happiest I’d ever been in my life, perhaps.

Then there was a guy on the lawn. I thought maybe it was this catering company that’d been outside earlier, but it was a police officer in full SWAT gear. I said, “Look. It’s the police!” I think I was excited, maybe.

And then’s when the officer seemed alarmed that we’d seen him, and looked towards our door, where a small group of them had gathered. And just like on TV… Open up. It’s the police.

There were several of them. One guy had a battering ram and was disappointed, maybe, that he didn’t get to use it because we’d opened the door on our own. Cops, usually, are like vampires. I don’t invite them in. But I was convinced they needed help. Perhaps this SWAT team needed a place to hunker down. Maybe a maniac was on the loose. They said they had a warrant. They told Shawn to have everyone in the house come outside. I put on pants and met them on the porch. They must be confused, I decided. So I asked them who they were looking for.

“It’s not who,” the officer with us on the porch said. “It’s what.”

Then he took off his sunglasses and The Who started playing. Wait, no. No, that wasn’t it. I asked him “what” he was looking for, and he said, “Marijuana.”

Well, here’s the thing. I had just moved into Shawn’s house the night before, like I said. Prior to this, I lived by myself in a one-bedroom apartment where no teams of armed, flak-jacketed police officers with battering rams ever came over. Shawn’s roommate before me was a guy who had a card to grow medical marijuana. I knew he had a card, and I knew he grew marijuana in the basement. I knew that medical marijuana was legal in the state of Michigan. That’s all I knew.

http://jbennettrylah.com/how-to-get-arrested-without-really-trying-or-fuck-the-police-or-fuck-the-war-on-drugs/

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
17. Yay, Drug War!
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 06:15 AM
Sep 2012

Another stellar victory in our nation's moral crusade to fill our prison cells with pot smokers!

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
26. Well, fortunately our state voters decriminalized weed possession up to 2 ounces a couple years back
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 10:36 AM
Sep 2012

That kept more than a few experimenting teens out of jail.

 

-..__...

(7,776 posts)
42. Up to 1oz... not 2oz
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 11:56 AM
Sep 2012
Section 32L. Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, possession of one ounce or less of marihuana shall only be a civil offense, subjecting an offender who is eighteen years of age or older to a civil penalty of one hundred dollars and forfeiture of the marihuana, but not to any other form of criminal or civil punishment or disqualification. An offender under the age of eighteen shall be subject to the same forfeiture and civil penalty provisions, provided he or she completes a drug awareness program which meets the criteria set forth in Section 32M of this Chapter. The parents or legal guardian of any offender under the age of eighteen shall be notified in accordance with Section 32N of this Chapter of the offense and the availability of a drug awareness program and community service option. If an offender under the age of eighteen fails within one year of the offense to complete both a drug awareness program and the required community service, the civil penalty may be increased pursuant to Section 32N of this Chapter to one thousand dollars and the offender and his or her parents shall be jointly and severally liable to pay that amount.



http://www.malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXV/Chapter94C/Section32L

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
25. The Massachusetts Crime Lab system is one of the state functions that
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 10:34 AM
Sep 2012

was ignored and not funded properly since the Dukakis years. Under a succession of republican Governors, including Mitt Romney, the once great system decayed. Samples went untested or were mishandled. Staff was cut. Labs were grossly understaffed. Incompetent people were hired to save money. No checks were made on qualifications before people were hired. Deval Patrick recognized and started fixing the problem after a high profile fuckup by one lab, but apparently Patrick hasn't been able to fix the system fast enough to get Dookhan out of it earlier. Good progress has been made to correct years of neglect, but this case shows that a lot of work remains.

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
36. That's what I've put together.
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 11:16 AM
Sep 2012

A terrible amount of underfunding here. Dookhan wouldn't have been able to cause this much damage without anything like proper funding and oversight.
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
52. Well, it's win-win.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 04:54 AM
Sep 2012

The state locks away a "drug offender?" It's a win! Another "scumbag" off the streets, more money for the Prison Industry, "tough on crime" laws are working!

The accused is cleared? It's a win! Justice prevailed, our state is clean, "tough on crime" laws are working!

There's no incentive on the part of legal system to fund or operate these labs well. If they work "as intended" with no funding as with good funding, then why fund them?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
30. Anyone who can look at these facts and still support criminalized marijuana is
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 10:47 AM
Sep 2012

not a good American citizen. This is shameful beyond shame. Criminals putting others in jail falsley using powers of the State.

2ndAmForComputers

(3,527 posts)
49. Oooooo, the evil, evil New England.
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 01:28 PM
Sep 2012

Not Real America like Alabama, Missouri, Kentucky and Arizona. Too many libruls.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
39. Is any governor personally tasked with appointing individual lab chemists?
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 11:45 AM
Sep 2012

I think you're going to have an uphill battle tying this to Romney.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
48. She was hired by someone who worked for someone,
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 01:24 PM
Sep 2012

who may have worked for someone who was hired by Romney... and worked for almost 5 years under a Deval Patrick appointee. If you're going to tie this to a governor, it doesn't look good for the current one either.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
46. Not checking credentials seems to be not that uncommon.
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 12:31 PM
Sep 2012

I was hired as supervisor of a large treatment program, and was shocked to find that several people there did not have the degrees they were supposed to have, and were not registered with the state, per state law.
and they had been hired years before I came on board.
Have had that problem in other places I worked, also.

Kennah

(14,293 posts)
50. From a purely financial perspective ...
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 02:36 AM
Sep 2012

... it would be cheaper for Massachusetts to decriminalize marijuana, not retry the cases botched by this, and offer settlements to those wrongfully jailed.

Likelihood of that, I'm guessing, is less than 20 percent.

 

obxhead

(8,434 posts)
53. LIFE and a day minimum.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 09:22 AM
Sep 2012

She should face life charges without the possibility of parole for this.

Why?

Because of her, 100's or more likely 1000's of years of jail time were handed out to potentially 100% innocent people.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mass. Chemist Faked Drug ...