Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,024 posts)
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 10:30 AM Sep 2012

ROMNEY'S TAX RETURN THROWS RAFALCA UNDER THE BUS!

Romney Rafalca Horse Tax Deduction: Back in 2010, Mitt Romney deducted the cost of maintaining (feeding, brushing, training) his wife's show horse, Rafalca, as a business expense. A lot of people ridiculed the idea that Rafalca was a business, arguing that, because Rafalca didn't generate any revenue, the horse was merely a hobby. But, assuming Rafalca was actually a business, that's kosher. Maybe the Romneys regarded Rafalca as a startup enterprise that would eventually produce revenue, or an asset that might eventually be sold at a gain.

In any event, the Romney's apparently no longer regard Rafalca as a business.

How do we know this? Because the Romneys didn't deduct the cost of Rafalca's care and feeding from their 2011 tax return. So, what changed? Why was Rafalca a business in 2010 and a personal hobby in 2011?

MORE:
http://www.businessinsider.com/romney-rafalca-horse-tax-deduction-2012-9

http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2012/09/romneys-tax-return-throws-rafalca-under-the-bus.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ROMNEY'S TAX RETURN THROWS RAFALCA UNDER THE BUS! (Original Post) kpete Sep 2012 OP
my understanding is you can only claim a loss for 3 years running before the irs deems it a hobby. unblock Sep 2012 #1
I feel sorry for the horse gopiscrap Sep 2012 #2

unblock

(52,352 posts)
1. my understanding is you can only claim a loss for 3 years running before the irs deems it a hobby.
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 10:33 AM
Sep 2012

of course, the rmoney argument would be that they didn't want to pay "too low" of a tax rate, just as they didn't claim millions in supposed charitable deductions.

gopiscrap

(23,765 posts)
2. I feel sorry for the horse
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 10:38 AM
Sep 2012

innocent animal having to be tainted by the "stench" of Rmoney and queen Ann

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ROMNEY'S TAX RETURN THROW...