General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCBS calls him "Mr. Obama". Twice. Why?
A reporter, commenting on his speech to the U.N. refers to him as "Mister Obama".
Cut to Scott Pelley, who also refers to him as "Mister Obama".
Am I right that it's generally accepted to call individuals who have achieved high public office by their title?
Present OR past?
"Governor Romney"
"Secretary Clinton"
Or at least "Former president Clinton".
Maybe I'm being picky, but it pisses me off.
montanacowboy
(6,093 posts)nt
spanone
(135,846 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)In the past there were occasional lapses, but since President Obama won, it has been common for news services to fail to use the title that he deserves.
It would be interesting to see if the same people are likely to call Romney Governor, but fail to call Obama President.
BanzaiBonnie
(3,621 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,200 posts)and as Mr. afterwards in all other references. Newspapers follow this as well.
FSogol
(45,491 posts)LeftofObama
(4,243 posts)Refer to him as President Obama the first time and you can use Mr. Obama after that.
trof
(54,256 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)DonViejo
(60,536 posts)Skittles
(153,169 posts)undeterred
(34,658 posts)eShirl
(18,494 posts)Presidents have been directly addressed by reporters as "Mr. [surname]" since before I was born.
enough
(13,259 posts)trof
(54,256 posts)eShirl
(18,494 posts)can I get you a pillow?
trof
(54,256 posts)Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)It is entirely proper to do so.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Do a google news search for "Mr. Bush".
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Journeyman
(15,036 posts)and all subsequent references within each story, (Last Name) is sufficient.
The New York Times refers to everyone as "Mr. (Last Name)" in all second references.
I see nothing wrong with what the CBS reporters are doing, and in fact, the "Mr." appellation is more respectful than a simple last name.
The AP Style Guide was first published in 1953.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Journeyman
(15,036 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)louis-t
(23,295 posts)Remember "WHO YOU TALKIN' TO?"
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)"Boy", and then, "you uppity n----r".
It is deliberately disrespectful.
Journeyman
(15,036 posts)on second reference in a news story, and has been since at least the mid-20th century? At least, that's when it was codified for all news agencies with the publication of the first AP Style Guide.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)GoneOffShore
(17,340 posts)First reference is President Obama - then Mr. Obama after that.
Same applies in France, England, and Germany as regards style.
Hence - President Hollande, former President Sarkozy - then Mr. Hollande, Mr. Sarkozy.
Prime Minister Cameron, then Mr Cameron.
etc, etc.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)That has been normal usage for DECADES.
Response to trof (Original post)
Tuesday Afternoon This message was self-deleted by its author.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)"Mr." is respect.
Really. It's OK.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Most protocols of address specify the formal title or something similar on the first mention and a simpler one thereafter.
There's absolutely nothing worth getting upset about here.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)... never call him President Obama. I hope they pay attention to their words more often, and remember he is the president.