"Is this the way Trump says this In "interviews" with potential nominees?"

[Nevilledog]

Link to tweet

[DonaldsRump]

1. This is clearly a line of questioning that Senator Harris will pursue

on the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing for Trump's appointee. Specifically, she and other Ds will undoubtedly ask what will the appointee do if election cases come before SCOTUS, has she had any discussions with anyone about election cases, etc.

Thanks, Trump and Reputincan fools: you've just given our VP candidate TONS of airtime! I suspect all Ds on the Judiciary Committee will give Senator Harris some or all of their time.

It also nails the appointee down for her testimony UNDER OATH. Truth means nothing to Reputincans, but it sure will to the Biden-appointed AG and US Attorneys! And you know what? Most prosecutors I've dealt with do not take kindly to contempt in refusing to show up or to answer questions.

Thank you, Reputincans/Trump. You are clearly desperate!

[Midnight Writer]

2. If we even have hearings. Moscow Mitch is in control. He can skip straight to a vote.

[DonaldsRump]

3. Even better! Joe and Kamala can harp on the hypocrisy and deviousness points!!

[canetoad]

4. One would expect such a nominee

If appointed in the final couple of weeks before a contested election, to recuse themself from adjudication on the election.

[BSdetect]

5. Maybe we could skip to arresting trump?