General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTens of thousands of people are suddenly eligible to vote in November in North Carolina
North Carolina Court Wipes Out Voting Restrictions Designed to Secure White SupremacyTens of thousands of people are suddenly eligible to vote in November.
On Friday, a North Carolina court dramatically expanded the number of voters eligible to participate in the 2020 election. The state may not disenfranchise citizens who owe fines, fees, and other debts from a felony conviction, the Wake County Superior Court ruled on Friday. And while the court limited its order to those affected by wealth-based voter suppression, its reasoning portends a broader ruling in the near future that could restore voting rights to 70,000 more North Carolinians on probation or parole.
Many felon disenfranchisement rules, including North Carolinas, are rooted in overt white supremacy. After Reconstruction, racist Democrats in the state sought to revoke Black citizens suffrage. They accomplished this task, in part, through vague criminal laws that stripped convicted felons of their civil rightsthen enforced these laws disproportionately against Black people. North Carolinas current statute is rooted in an 1877 law spearheaded by a representative who later presided over the lynching of three Black men. At the time, Democrats argued that felon disenfranchisement was necessary to stop the honest vote of a white man from being off-set by the vote of some negro. Its purpose, alongside other Jim Crow measures like the literacy test, was to secure white supremacy.
The law continues to work as intended, as documented in an expert report by University of North Carolina professor Frank R. Baumgartner. Today, Black North Carolinians represent 22 percent of adults and 42 percent of the disenfranchised. Black residents are denied the right to vote at three times the rate of white residents in 44 counties. The states disenfranchisement regime targets two groups of people: those on probation or parole, and those whove completed their full sentence but still owe court debt. Notably, judges may extend an individuals probation or send them back to prison because they havent paid off these fines and fees.
Few do manage to pay off these debts. Like Florida, North Carolina practices cash register justice, funding its criminal system by extracting money from those who encounter it. Any person charged in district court is billed a minimum of $173. They must pay $25 for a criminal record check, $60 for a public defender, and $600 for lab analysis of evidence. Those sentenced to community service must pay $250; those placed under house arrest with electronic monitoring must pay $90 upfront, then $4.48 a day; those sentenced to a local jail must pay $40 a dayon top of the $10 a day they paid if detained before conviction. People on probation must pay $40 a month to fund their own supervision. Judges have authority to waive court debt. But they are also elected, and fearful of retribution at the polls if theyre deemed soft on criminals. In 2015, North Carolina Republicans passed legislation publicizing each judges annual waiver rate in an effort to shame them out of waiving fines and fees.
<...>
Link to tweet
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Any chance the Trump Criminal Enterprise can sue or appeal or something to stop it from happening? Cause if they can, they most certainly will.
What's NOT cool? Slate going out of their way to keep saying "Democrats".
Even though it probably was, technically.
Funtatlaguy
(10,890 posts)klook
(12,171 posts)dchill
(38,557 posts)packman
(16,296 posts)Last edited Wed Sep 9, 2020, 11:35 AM - Edit history (1)
in just another name.
StrictlyRockers
(3,855 posts)We should have nothing resembling them in 2020.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,908 posts)of shitty cash register justice. I have a friend who lives in that state and has done volunteer work in prisons for several decades now. He has told me about this stuff many times.
RainCaster
(10,927 posts)LiberalFighter
(51,156 posts)Anyone that has better finances would likely be able to avoid some of those fees. Especially the daily fees.
world wide wally
(21,756 posts)onetexan
(13,069 posts)She is up for reelection so N. Carolinians pls vote to keep her in office. Repugs almost impeached her.
BComplex
(8,072 posts)It's a really rigged system toward the rich getting to skate, and the poor digging the hole deeper. It really needs an overhaul.
onetexan
(13,069 posts)Blue Owl
(50,526 posts)n/t