Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gibbs: What's Mitt Romney Hiding? (Original Post) bigtree Sep 2012 OP
That's how it should be done. gulliver Sep 2012 #1
Yes. And he gave me my name! ProfessionalLeftist Sep 2012 #2
"If he loses this race, he can go back and get" the extra deduction. COME ON PEOPLE, WTF BlueStreak Sep 2012 #3
He probably would say that, but in fact, there is no "legal requirement," is there? Chiyo-chichi Sep 2012 #4
No legal requirement. It is a question of character. BlueStreak Sep 2012 #6
kick Liberal_in_LA Sep 2012 #5
 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
3. "If he loses this race, he can go back and get" the extra deduction. COME ON PEOPLE, WTF
Sun Sep 23, 2012, 01:00 PM
Sep 2012

He is going to "go back and get" that money no matter what happens in the election. If he loses, he'll amend his return in November, 2012. If he were somehow to win, he would still amend his return, but he would find a convenient time to do that, when it isn't likely to come up again. He has until April 14, 2015 to "go back and get" that money.

And guess what, it is confidential information, so nobody would ever know. If asked, he will simply say, "I provided an extensive disclosure of my finances -- 20 years worth -- during the campaign. That is much more than required by law and I will not discuss that subject any further."

Chiyo-chichi

(3,585 posts)
4. He probably would say that, but in fact, there is no "legal requirement," is there?
Sun Sep 23, 2012, 01:13 PM
Sep 2012

Releasing multiple years -- in full -- is not a "legal requirement" despite the fact that Ann Romney said last month "we've released what is legally required." It is a tradition, followed by all presidential candidates in the last 40+ years... one begun by his father.

And sure, even if he should win (God forbid), he could amend his return and take the full deduction.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
6. No legal requirement. It is a question of character.
Sun Sep 23, 2012, 08:51 PM
Sep 2012

It is highly disingenuous of Romney:

a) to artificially manipulate his taxes in order to match his bogus claims

b) to act like he doesn't plan to get the money back as soon as the cameras point somewhere else.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gibbs: What's Mitt Romney...