General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSam Wang----probably no convention bounces
So I opened up this site and get a sense of panic here. What did I miss?
Anyway this tweet is reassuring to me: (Sam Wang does Princeton Election Consortium)
Sam Wang
@SamWangPhD
·
Aug 28
Replying to
@SamWangPhD
My take: probably these conventions aren't going to move opinion much at all. Maybe 1 point toward Biden; that's of course a guess.
Here's a sensitive indicator, surprisingly responsive considering it uses state polls only. Watch it in the coming days:
Image
Thekaspervote
(32,827 posts)Biden would get much of a bounce
fierywoman
(7,709 posts)Bleacher Creature
(11,258 posts)I think he ate like a chocolate covered cricket or something like that.
Hopefully he's tweaked his model so that he's not wrong again as it's looking good these days.
fierywoman
(7,709 posts)Ew! Any kind of bug is one bug too many!
regnaD kciN
(26,045 posts)(Yes, everybody favored Clinton, but generally with about a 65%-71% chance, not 98%.)
Sorry, but if there's one polling prognosticator who currently deserves zero credibility, it's Wang.
LymphocyteLover
(5,667 posts)for much of the summer of 2016, he was saying Hillary had a 99% chance of wining.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)Slowing mail, stopping drop boxes, intimidating voters, fighting and questioning every absentee ballot, interfering however he can thats his bread and butter. So I dont know how anyone can predict a race thats not actually happening. Its scary as heck.
LymphocyteLover
(5,667 posts)Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)That's what led to his unmatched incompetence in 2016