Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cally

(21,602 posts)
Sat Aug 29, 2020, 09:50 PM Aug 2020

Sam Wang----probably no convention bounces

So I opened up this site and get a sense of panic here. What did I miss?

Anyway this tweet is reassuring to me: (Sam Wang does Princeton Election Consortium)


Sam Wang
@SamWangPhD
·
Aug 28
Replying to
@SamWangPhD
My take: probably these conventions aren't going to move opinion much at all. Maybe 1 point toward Biden; that's of course a guess.

Here's a sensitive indicator, surprisingly responsive considering it uses state polls only. Watch it in the coming days:
Image

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Thekaspervote

(32,827 posts)
1. As was mentioned here earlier when your lead is in the 50+ range it wouldn't be expected that
Sat Aug 29, 2020, 09:55 PM
Aug 2020

Biden would get much of a bounce

Bleacher Creature

(11,258 posts)
4. Mine too, although he kind of took the easy way out when he ate the bug.
Sat Aug 29, 2020, 10:19 PM
Aug 2020

I think he ate like a chocolate covered cricket or something like that.

Hopefully he's tweaked his model so that he's not wrong again as it's looking good these days.

fierywoman

(7,709 posts)
9. I think the only thing he got wrong the last time was not factoring in the cheating by Russia.
Sat Aug 29, 2020, 11:32 PM
Aug 2020

Ew! Any kind of bug is one bug too many!

regnaD kciN

(26,045 posts)
3. The same Sam Wang who gave Hillary a 98% chance of victory on Election Day morning?
Sat Aug 29, 2020, 10:17 PM
Aug 2020

(Yes, everybody favored Clinton, but generally with about a 65%-71% chance, not 98%.)

Sorry, but if there's one polling prognosticator who currently deserves zero credibility, it's Wang.

LymphocyteLover

(5,667 posts)
6. exactly what I was going to say-- he did us no favors and has no credibility to me
Sat Aug 29, 2020, 10:37 PM
Aug 2020

for much of the summer of 2016, he was saying Hillary had a 99% chance of wining.

soothsayer

(38,601 posts)
5. Drumpf's trying to win by cheating, not by campaigning
Sat Aug 29, 2020, 10:35 PM
Aug 2020

Slowing mail, stopping drop boxes, intimidating voters, fighting and questioning every absentee ballot, interfering however he can— that’s his bread and butter. So I don’t know how anyone can predict a race that’s not actually happening. It’s scary as heck.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sam Wang----probably no c...