great analysis of "the worst interview in history"

[Demovictory9]

[DonaldsRump]

1. This was very good

I know some folks don't appreciate David Pakman, but this is an excellent example of his attention to detail and showing the very specific ways that Trump uses to gaslight/confuse people about his con job.

[Layzeebeaver]

2. Agree!

Packman is on our side. I appreciate his detailed analysis and summaries.

In his early days he was still trying to find his feet but in the past couple of years he his coming into a good style.

[secondwind]

4. Your comment above is why I listened to him for the very first time.

Loved it! He really explains everything so well! Thank you!

[Roy Rolling]

3. Agreed +1

I’m totally superficial when I think his delivery grates me. But his content is always superb. It’s really a packaging thing—his producers (maybe him) should push him(the show) to higher goals.

Again, a superficial opinion. But to reach a wider audience it wouldn’t hurt to take away some of the rough edges of the show. If that is his goal in the first place. He may be happy where he is and it’s a wonderful accomplishment—he should be happy with the show. Well done.

[smirkymonkey]

5. I would have to agree with you there.

He usually annoys me, but I think he did well with this particular segment.