General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsErskine Bowles Exposed: "Catfood Commissioner exposed as freeloader" --Dean Baker
[i Just so you know...Erskine is on Obama's list for Secretary of Treasury. So we
have to hope that in Obama's Second Term he can get rid of these ticks and fleas and users from Wall Street)
-------------
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Catfood Commissioner exposed as freeloader
The peerless Dean Baker tells us who the real government freeloaders are after the secret Romney video became public.
(If you're late to the party, Romney told his rich friends:
There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what
These are people who pay no income tax.)
One of the chief proponents of cutting Medicare and Social Security benefits is Erskine Bowles, co-chairman of the Catfood Commission National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. Baker calls him out as the poster child for people who get hundreds of thousands of dollars a year for sitting on a corporate board for which they did little obvious work.
Writes Baker:
Mr. Bowles has earned millions of dollars sitting on corporate boards over the last decade. The stock prices of the companies on whose boards he sat have mostly plummeted. Since 2003 the Erskine Bowles stock index has lost more than one third of its value. By comparison, the S&P 500 has risen by more than 50 percent. If Mr. Bowles was trying to serve shareholders, he has not done a very good job.
If people think that this is a private matter, with Mr. Bowles just ripping off shareholders while Governor Romney's freeloaders are ripping off taxpayers, think again. One of the companies on whose board Mr. Bowles sat, General Motors, went bankrupt with substantial costs to the government. Another, Morgan Stanley, would have gone bankrupt without extraordinary assistance from the Fed and Treasury, which continues to this day in the form of implicit too big to fail insurance.
So if we want to have a debate about people who freeload on the rest of the country, we should have folks like Erskine Bowles at center stage. Of course he is in a much higher income bracket than the folks who get Social Security or unemployment insurance from the government, but that fact should not be allowed to color the debate.
http://teamsternation.blogspot.com/2012/09/catfood-commissioner-exposed-as.html
KoKo
(84,711 posts)We have to hope that in Obama's second term he can get rid of these ticks and fleas.
He needs a Fresh Start. Exposing some of the these people will help him get one.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Vote for Obama (the alternative is far worse), but put the pressure on him to make appointments representing the 99%.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)He needs to be HELD ACCOUNTABLE! You said it....
Why do all this effort if we are just punching buttons and go home to see the latest "boob job" from SNOOKI or the ROYALS bathing in a moment of freedom and it's plastered all over.
Get rid of the MEDIA CRAP and VOTE....and HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE!
Response to KoKo (Reply #1)
AnotherMcIntosh This message was self-deleted by its author.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)they both give me shivers along with Geithner.....and that's why we need to let Oama KNOW how we feel...and keep on top of who his "lesser picks are." We are a Democracy and our Pesident SERVES US....WE....THE THE PEOPLE...and Down and Out and Dirty as we are...we ARE THE PEOPLE!
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)Their SHITs even match.
These issues should be exposed. Not holding my breath for the "fresh start" though.
But if we can elect a Democratic Congress, there will be less of an excuse for austerity.
tech3149
(4,452 posts)During his first term, I think Obama was too optimistic and conciliatory. His history and writings showed a propensity toward capitalistic principles and deference to the financial industries. His choices for economic advisers only confirmed my fears.
I can only hope that a second lame duck term will allow him to follow an economic policy that disregards Wall St interests, but I am not hopeful. There were many advisers during the campaign that had presented ideas that were counter to the generally accepted ideas. Why they were not accepted is beyond my capabilities, I'm not a mind reader. Considering the massive bureaucratic/groupthink infrastructure he had to deal with, he may have just been overwhelmed.
If he truly believes in a more equitable and sustainable economic system, he will counter the advice of the status quo advisers with equal input from the out of the mainstream advisers that have been more often than not accurate in their predictions.
There are so many reasons that I would not support Obama but the reality is that the only other choice is more horrible by magnitudes.