CNBC battleground polls

[left-of-center2012]

Latest 2020 State Presidential Election Polls

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/state_president/

[Trenzalore]

1. I don't believe Biden is only +2 in PA at the same time he is +2 in Arizona

Demographically that makes 0 sense.

[lagomorph777]

2. Assume a fair amount of noise in the data at this point.

Overall, the numbers are very encouraging. IF we GOTV.

[samsingh]

3. it makes no sense. The Michigan number is bullshit.

[Drunken Irishman]

4. Or that he's up 5 in WI but only +2 in MI.

[sunonmars]

5. Shitty pollster of Change Research, these are absolute kak.

[Fiendish Thingy]

6. These are LV's not just RV's , and bound to be tighter

Although I didn’t expect this much tightening this soon.

Good news is MOE is only 1.94%, so at least Michigan appears beyond the MOE.

[calguy]

8. An earlier article showing trump pulling out ads in Michigan

tells you all you need to know.... for now.

[Fiendish Thingy]

9. I'm confused - is Trump removing ads from Michigan market? Nt

[calguy]

11. Posted here this morning

https://democraticunderground.com/100213823435

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/29/us/politics/michigan-trump-biden-2020.html

[calguy]

7. Let 'em show a tighter range

We don't need the complacency that comes with wide lead margins.
Work like we're 10 points down.

[edhopper]

10. Needs more in PA

and at least 5% in FL to overcome cheating.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

12. C- rated online non random poll. The only way Nate rates you lower is if you make up results

[Cicada]

13. They get respondents with online ads

The accuracy of online polls has astounded me.,I would never have expected them to be be accurate at all yet in many cases they have been about as accurate as traditional polls. Of course I am also amazed at how accurate traditional polls are.