General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLawrence O'Donnel's segment on Hate for Eric Holder
by the Mitt Romney fund raiser group is required viewing. Try this link...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/49097149#VpFlash
Carla in Sequim
(228 posts)that was absolutely powerful. I remember Mitchell, too.
The R's will always have the lead when it comes to corruption.
Cha
(297,343 posts)BootinUp
(47,165 posts)avebury
(10,952 posts)Response to BootinUp (Original post)
Post removed
TomCADem
(17,390 posts)The notion that Fast and Furious was actually designed to fail in order to promote a broader assault gun ban is nothing more than a RW fantasy. I think it is far more reasonable to believe that this was a sting that went wrong, rather than some nefarious liberal plot to take away guns from the people.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2012/0623/What-conspiracy-lies-behind-Eric-Holder-and-Fast-and-Furious
That contention, liberals say, is on its face absurd. Comedy Central satirist Stephen Colbert summed up the extent of the alleged conspiracy on Friday, concluding Fast and Furious-spawned border violence was intended to panic Americans in order to gin up support for a Draconian gun control measure Obama has never introduced. Complicated? Yes. The fevered ramblings of a syphilitic brain? Perhaps.
But the worse than Watergate internet rumblings aside, last weeks Oversight Committee vote which fell along partisan lines to recommend Holder for a House vote on contempt and President Obamas decision on the same day to invoke executive privilege to keep related documents secret did enliven debate about whats really at stake with the investigation. To wit, whether the documents Congress wants and that the Administration wont release may be able to confirm or put to rest suspicions that not just Holder, but Obama, had a policy hand in Fast and Furious.
In opening the contempt hearing on Wednesday, Mr. Issa contended that, [The contempt hearing] is not about this investigation, its about a narrow subset of documents that this committee must ultimately receive.
But in April, Issa gave an interview at the National Rifle Association convention in St. Louis, in which he gave credence to suspicions held by many conservatives and gun owners about the programs true intent.
Could it be that what they really were thinking of was in fact to use this walking of guns in order to promote an assault weapons ban? Rep. Issa said. Many think so. And [the administration] hasnt come up with an explanation that would cause any of us not to agree.
former-republican
(2,163 posts)The operation was to in fact try to track arms.
But for one moment to think that Holder didn't know about this on going operation strains any type of credibility.
Kingofalldems
(38,461 posts)about how Holder is guilty. Know him?
George II
(67,782 posts)....and shortly after Obama took office, they discovered all the problems with the program and discontinued it immediately.
Unfortunately the agent was killed with guns acquired through a bush program but after bush left office, so it's "Obama's problem"!
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)other right wingers.
Paladin
(28,266 posts)If Garaghty is the best you're got, try another day.......
former-republican
(2,163 posts)If you think every high ranking officer in the Attorney Generals office knew about this operation.
Yet they never once discussed this with Holder.
Then I guess you decided.
George II
(67,782 posts)Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)News to me that Reagan appointed Holder a federal judge.
I was half expecting Gonzo's name to come up....remember him?
K&R
malaise
(269,072 posts)excellent