Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WhiskeyGrinder

(22,444 posts)
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 09:00 AM Jul 2020

The Left's Deafening Silence on China's Ethnic Cleansing



https://newrepublic.com/article/158374/left-deafening-silence-uighur-china

In an Alaska-sized chunk of western China known as Xinjiang, the greatest human rights atrocities of this unfurling decade continue to sprint forward, tipping toward genocide. The region has long been coveted by authorities in Beijing; standing in the way of their settler-colonial designs is the fact that the area is the homeland of approximately 11 million Uighurs, an ethnic Turkic and largely Muslim population. Chinese officials have also viewed the region, and the Uighurs in particular, as a petri-dish population on which to inflict their burgeoning, AI-infused dictatorship, and all of the crimes against humanity entailed therein.

The marriage of those two realities—of settler-colonialism as official policy, and of harnessing technology in the pure service of brutal dictatorship and ethnic Han supremacy alike—has, for the time being, cemented Beijing’s control over the region. But it has simultaneously resulted in one of the greatest mass atrocities the world has seen in decades. And yet just as significant is the silence from significant segments of the Western body politic, most especially those on the left. Where in the past one would find loud and bold confrontations with dictatorial illiberalism, from South Africa’s dark apartheid era, to the more recent persecution of the Muslim Rohingyas at the hands of the government of Myanmar, the Western left has been oddly muted and non-confrontational against what is arguably this young century’s most egregious crime against humanity.

The horrors Beijing has rolled out in Xinjiang are almost too nauseating to name. Buoyed by a series of thousands of so-called “re-education camps,” Chinese Communist Party (CCP) authorities have effectively transformed the entire region into what The New York Times describes as a “virtual prison,” with everything from race-based facial recognition tools to the tracking of DNA samples and iris scans stalking Uighurs wherever they go. To take just one measure of comparison, Xinjiang now has a higher level of police density than even East Germany—which itself had magnitudes more police informants per capita than even Nazi Germany—at the end of the Cold War. “Nowhere in the world, not even in North Korea, is the population monitored as strictly as it is in” Xinjiang, wrote Der Spiegel.

The comparisons to North Korea extend beyond simple monitoring protocols. Rian Thum, a historian at Loyola University in New Orleans who has researched Xinjiang development for some two decades, said in 2018 that Xinjiang “has become a police state to rival North Korea, with a formalized racism on the order of South African apartheid.” Thum later added that the CCP’s policies in the region are now “a mix of the North Korean aspiration for total control of thought and action, with the racialized implementation of apartheid South Africa and Chinese AI [artificial intelligence] and surveillance technology.” The Economist concurred, describing the CCP’s policies in the region as “as race-based as apartheid in South Africa was.” As Chinese dictator Xi Jinping outlined in a series of leaked documents, the CCP will implement the “organs of dictatorship” to show “absolutely no mercy” to Uighurs, whether or not they’re sucked into the CCP’s camps.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

WhiskeyGrinder

(22,444 posts)
2. Read the article!
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 09:04 AM
Jul 2020
But as 2020 hurtles on, the left’s inaction increasingly stands out. For instance, Democratic nominee Joe Biden, the American center-left made flesh, has become the world’s most prominent political leader to call out the CCP’s program for exactly what they are: concentration camps. Xi, per Biden, “is a guy who is a thug who in fact, has a million Uighurs in reconstruction camps, meaning concentration camps.” Biden said he would not only personally confront Xi over the CCP’s genocidal ambitions, but that he would additionally “work with our allies and partners to stand against... mass detention and repression of Uighurs and other ethnic minorities and support a pathway for those persecuted to find safe haven in the United States and other nations.” (Sanders himself said he’d support many of the same policies Biden backed, such as targeted sanctions.)

WhiskeyGrinder

(22,444 posts)
8. Biden isn't a leftist.
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 09:34 AM
Jul 2020

The subhed of the article makes it clearer:

Anti-imperialist leftists can’t afford to cede this issue to centrist Democrats and the Trumpist right.

The Magistrate

(95,255 posts)
11. Better They Attack The Chinese Than Democrats, Ma'am
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 10:46 AM
Jul 2020

It will not be useful in itself, but will be useful in that such a focus will not harm the prospects of evicting Trump and the christo-fascist cabal in November.

 

ansible

(1,718 posts)
3. In hindsight, Nixon opening up China to the west was a deal with the devil
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 09:09 AM
Jul 2020

Their atrocities are terrible, but realistically what can the west do with such a powerful trading partner? Unless americans lose their appetite for cheap chinese goods, nothing will change.

JI7

(89,274 posts)
4. Biden from Last year and he has spoken more recently also
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 09:12 AM
Jul 2020

The TPP was a way to decrease China's power and not allow them to use their economic power to avoid any negative response for other issues like human rights abuses. . People should have listened to Obama.

Hillary Clinton also had a history of speaking out against China's human rights abuses. She should have been President .


Squinch

(51,016 posts)
7. But that's all "deafening silence," doncha know? Edited to add: I've been told calling it
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 09:33 AM
Jul 2020

"deafening silence" is accurate because, according to the explainer, Biden isn't part of "The Left" referred to in the headline.

Because, it just never ends.

Wawannabe

(5,680 posts)
10. This house is burning down all around us
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 10:09 AM
Jul 2020

We gotta get back on a footing that will allow us to confront and sanction and go to war if needed to reckon with some of the atrocities. BUT, right now there is no power to act. Only power to speak. The “actor” is a nationalist and cares nothing about this except for adding to the chaos.

The U.S. is crippled by a fugging idiot “leader” and we can’t do shit for the world right now. Period.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Left's Deafening Sile...