BOLTON's newest framing ploy, on The View - "I agreed to (final wording)"

[UTUSN]

Sunny HOSTIN said that others "in the room" have disagreed with some of his versions, especially about SHITLER's begging China to buy more American crops in order to help him in the election.

*** So BOLTON comes up with a new one: That in the pre-publication review (by the SHITLER regime? By his publisher?), he had to agree to change some things and was bound to the changed wordings, not *his* wordings. So 'tain't *his* fault!1

This jerk is *INFURIATING* - as said elsewhere, 1) That choosing SHITLER as less "worse" than Hillary/BIDEN/any-Dem. 2) That testifying wouldn't help the Dems' "partisan, botched impeachment." 3) That he thought he could work SHITLER into things.

Shows how his permanent reputation as being a dangerous idiot is fully valid, that he is LIMITED in insight and blinded by ideology, and here he has always put himself in the specialized field where INSIGHT is especially needed.

[UTUSN]

1. He's repeating how "bipartisan" Watergate hearings were, naming Howard BAKER

We used to think BAKER was a decent type - he of the What-did-the-president-know-and-when - but recent histories show he was a mole for Tricky Dick and worked to mitigate or undermine the investigations.

The "bipartisanship" only happened when the Repukes had to use it to cover the inevitable.

[UTUSN]

2. Whoa!1 Meegan nailed him on dismantling the OBAMA precautions against pandemics

She said *he* was behind the dismantling, asked him whether he admits error now. He never gives an inch, says the problem was having "an empty chair" in the Oval, that SHITLER wasn't interested in hearing anything negative about China.