General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOccupy Lives
http://rt.com/usa/news/occupy-wall-street-anniversary-318/video and photos and link
there is also a live stream from rt here:
http://rt.com/on-air/ows-one-year-protest/
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)are any other media outlets even covering this?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)it is fun watching the anti-99% so hopeful that it would just go away.
tama
(9,137 posts)to confuse the corporate-media-bubble with "reality".
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)not on the news but in the assembly
85 others arrested as well
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)of the fact that they intended to arrest everyone they could. They really are afraid of this movement for some reason.
They should be, because despite their crackdown OWS has been very busy all year, gathering more support and engaged in actions against the banks and doing work that Congress should have been doing protecting the people in their homes, eg.
OWS trending on Twitter right now!
#OWS and #S17 atop national trending topics: pic.twitter.com/nYkD9zYf
Retweeted by Occupy Chicago
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)tama
(9,137 posts)the mike check megaphone.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)I'm going to the Occupy Denver event shortly - we'll be dancing in front of Wells Fargo to celebrate saving a couple families from fraudulent foreclosure!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)of the Meltdown.
How many homes did Congress save I wonder?
randome
(34,845 posts)Just Google "recent mortgage legislation" and read a few, including what's known as the Obama Mortgage Refinancing Program.
The additional tax break I got on my new home in 2010 helped me and my daughters a lot!
On edit: It appears I added that 2nd sentence after your response.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)for the people. Good they are listening. And they will be hearing a lot more from OWS over in its second year.
randome
(34,845 posts)You keep trying to 'prove' that Occupy has been helpful. I agree. It has. I disagree that it is 'growing in numbers' or represents some new social paradigm.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)It's just not as visible.
You'll see more, though it might not actually be called "Occupy".
randome
(34,845 posts)For good or bad, the word 'Occupy' has come to signify camping out in public parks and demanding that corporations behave better.
A name change, some leadership and we can still call it a success. Without those, I don't see what more will come of it.
I mean, the DU Occupy forum gets barely a dozen posts a week and 90% of those are from the same poster. Support is clearly lagging. That's not corporate wishful thinking on my part, it's reality.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Why? Why would anyone want to side with Wall Street against the people who finally got out in the streets to try to do something about the corruption and the money in politics and all the other issues that have so adversely affected the American people?
That's what I would like to know. Why would you not want to see them be successful? Unless you don't think there are any problems with the way things are.
randome
(34,845 posts)I would like them to be successful. But I think it's a waste of time trying to shame corporations into behaving better. It will never work.
Putting more pressure on legislators will help. What the hell was it all about in NYC just now? Protesting Bank of America? For what? For being a mindless greed machine? That's what a corporation is. They will do whatever they can get away with.
The ones who open the doors and let them take what they want are the legislators. That's where the focus needs to be.
But without leadership, it is inevitable that OWS will drift about. Inevitable. That says nothing about what I would like to see happen.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)have been presented with, you still appear to be unable to accept it.
I see you pushing for 'leadership' again. Lol, OWS will NEVER fall for that. The NYPD demanded that they produce their 'leaders' too. And we all know why. It was a brilliant tactic to deprive them of scapegoats, but not a new one.
Interesting that you oppose 'leaders' for Wikileaks, but demand them for OWS. Which is it, is identifying leaders good or bad? You need to make up your mind!
But as always, thanks for kicking the threads you oppose which always seems to be anything that the masses do to try to change the way things are.
randome
(34,845 posts)Opposing leaders for Wikileaks? I've never said anything about that. I think Assange is an ass, if that's what you mean.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)be a waste of time, as you have a habit if ignoring or forgetting information you appear to be resistant to.
But most people understand the history and the concept and the very important reasons for the decision. I remember the pre-OWS discussions about this decision and they were incredibly in-depth and informing.
It was a brilliant idea. By now any leader they could have laid their hands on would be condemned by people like you who fell for the smearing of Wikileaks' leader. Sorry, we will not oblige the smear merchants and their supporters.
I have no doubt doubt such a person would right now be fighting Sex Scandal charges in NYC with screaming headlies from Murdoch's Rag the NYPost.
It has been so frustrating for the 1% that they have been foiled in their plans to smear the leader of OWS. Fun to watch them too, always demanding a leader.
They did try the sex scandal tactic on OWS though, but it failed. Breitbart was behind that.
tama
(9,137 posts)take your pick and follow and obey one. Lot's of candidates around to lead you (and leash you ).
It's just awfully silly to try to tell others they should follow some leader if they don't want - and prefer democracy to obeying "leader".
BTW who IS your leader? Wouldn't be fair to tell others to get a leader, if you don't have a leader. So who is your boss?
randome
(34,845 posts)...I would do so in a much more organized fashion. By hundreds of groups not working together but in loose collectives, a hundred different messages get trumpeted and nothing is accomplished.
It's been a year now. And I hear that OWS is growing in ever-greater numbers. Where is the proof of that? I can be convinced otherwise. But Reality, from where I see it, shows differently.
There is practically no interest in the DU Occupy forum. Protesters today went up against Bank of America to do...what?
So you don't want the economic system of the world to change, but to do as your supervisors and managers tell you. That's a honest admission, appreciated.
Other people want freedom instead of more bosses, but I guess that is impossible for you to understand, at least in your current situation.
randome
(34,845 posts)That's hogwash. Everyone has their own definition of what freedom means. Including all the sub-groups within OWS, which is part of the problem.
If OWS would coordinate better and focus on one or two things to change, that would be all for the better. For everyone.
I would suggest overturning Citizens United as a good issue to rally behind. After that, full corporate campaign disclosure laws. Two things that are related and would do a lot of good.
Not ENOUGH good, of course, but it would be a start.
very bad communication from my part, if it can be interpreted as "If you're not with us, you're against us!" I don't like that attitude in any form, including from Democratic party loyalists.
I've been following a feed from NYC all day and what I see excellent coordination and organization, which is also quite "chaotic" (in the sense of unpredictable) in it's beautifully democratic way. To me it seems that the main issue you fail to understand is that this is 1) global movement of many forms, and how 2) radical it really is. There is no "common goal" or way to express that in a way that would be satisfactory to all, except perhaps "Another World". Rather, we are movement of one heart with many heads and hands each doing what they can best. And what you can best is probably what you spent most time doing, for me that's writing and talking people through Internet. I'm not doing this from obligation, but because I enjoy this and cannot at least at the moment think of anything better to do. So, there are many people working on Citizens United, using the skills best suited for that purpose, and so on with million other issues and things to do.
If we need a starting point for this movement, I would put the marker at Zapatista uprising, soon after Soviet Collapse and at the moment of NAFTA ratification. In US the movement in it's most visible and mainstream form has taken the name Occupy, but of course Seattle etc. etc. have been manifestations of the same movement.
randome
(34,845 posts)Last year, I said I wished OWS would do more mass protests instead of park encampments. But I don't see what 'protesting' BOA will accomplish. They don't seem to be a worthy target to me.
What does OWS want them to do? Give away money? Ease up on rules and fees? What rules? What fees? I don't see what the point of this particular protest is.
You can't shame a corporation into behaving better. You CAN, however, put pressure on legislators to stop letting the banks rob us. That's where I think more effort needs to be focused.
tama
(9,137 posts)now going on in Zucotti park, there seems to be strong consensus that they want to "Imagine world without Wall Street". So we don't want the banks doing anything, just stop doing. One of the main reasons is the fact that corporations can't be shamed into behaving better. With people there is always hope.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)draconian fees on already over charged clients AFTER they lost billions of dollars in deposits. Now their remaining clients have less fees to pay, and guess what, BOA didn't collapse. The truth is they will squeeze every last dime out of the people, unless the people do what OWS is doing, refusing to pay their extortion fees.
OWS has also forced them to negotiate, as they are supposed to do, with homeowners, rather than foreclosing on them. And as a result, people have remained in their homes, BOA still did not collapse, neighborhoods avoided even more devaluation of property and BOA learned that the People have more Power than Congress when they choose to exercise it.
Congress failed to do both of those things for the people. OWS succeeded. And that is just one minor example of how OWS has been doing Congress' job for Main Street, and preventing the corrupt banks from ripping off the people whenever they were made aware of it.
This is a democracy, and the people are supposed to have power. Up to now, they have had none. Wall Street has been running this country. Now the people are taking it back a little bit at a time and they have only just begun.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)"BOA already did what OWS wanted them to do. They stopped imposing even more draconian fees on already over charged clients AFTER they lost billions of dollars in deposits. Now their remaining clients have less fees to pay"
I left BOFA after they did indeed quietly introduce new fees after reconsidering the very public one they tried to impose last year that got a lot of press.
You have your facts wrong.
Try a simple google and see the fees they imposed about 6 months ago.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)movement? They accomplished their goal. Hundreds of thousands of Americans removed their money from big banks as was the stated goal for that day. OWS is NOT Congress, they are ordinary Americans yet they stopped those fees with one day of protests. Then it was up to Congress.
Your blame is a bit misplaced. The people do not have the power to pass the proper laws that could end these predatory practices, but they CAN organize and at least temporarily stop them, but then their Representatives who do have the power to make it permanent, are supposed to do their jobs.
In that one day protesters saved ordinary people more money that Congress has in four years.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)The fees they imposed on my business two years ago haven't gone anywhere. Public outcry ended the debt card fee.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)day' movement across the country and hundreds of thousands of people moved their money even before the official start of the protest.
After that it was up to Congress to follow through. Congress didn't even try to stop those fees because Congress works for them.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)those who are out their putting their freedom and lives on the line trying to do something considering NO ONE was even trying until they did.
So, what is stopping you from doing what they are trying to do, since you are so certain you would do it so much better?
I look forward to following YOUR movement since all I am interested in is that someone do SOMETHING. If you can do it better than OWS, then consider me one of your most loyal supporters.
However, after one year of reading your comments, I see no indication that you are doing anything other than sitting behind your computer, jumping into every thread about OWS or Wikileaks, and presenting distorted information, while assuring us you could do it all better.
Let us know when you have your plans in place so we can all get on board.
Meanwhile we will support the people who are out there doing something, who aren't wasting time sitting around criticizing other people for at least trying.
Until you start showing us how much better you can do it, your comments serve only one purpose, they kick threads like this and offer an opportunity to those who actually have the facts on these issues, to present them.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)You're correct; as only people can express shame.
girl gone mad
(20,634 posts)It pulled demand forward briefly, but ended up putting tens of thousands of additional homeowners underwater. The vast majority of people who took this credit would have been much better off simply waiting on the sidelines.
The basic impact of the tax credit was transferring money from homebuyers to sellers and their lenders, according to economist Dean Baker in his study First Time Underwater: The Impact of the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit.
Why would you promote this? This is a great example of the type of bullshit pro-banker policy Occupy is fighting against.
randome
(34,845 posts)A rough divorce and a safe haven for my daughters. No contest!
tama
(9,137 posts)can be extremely "pushy". My sincere sympathy, been there done that.
Maybe the tax write-off wasn't perfect legislation (no legislation is) but it helped some people.
girl gone mad
(20,634 posts)The problem is not that it wasn't perfect, the problem is that it was bad policy. Like most of the administrations' economic policies, it was drafted with the express intent of helping the banks, not helping the people.
ETA: My brother is just one example of someone hurt by this program. He and his young wife decided to pull the trigger on a home purchase thinking this credit was the deal of a lifetime. They are now some $30k underwater.
Timmy foamed that runway, though. Who cares who gets hurt, right? Just as long as the pigs on Wall Street get to feed.
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)Bragi
(7,650 posts)That's easier than discussing why it died, and what would need to be changed to rebuild the 99% movement for equality, without embracing the dysfunctional and distracting "Occupy" tactic that killed it.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Btw, OWS was declared dead one year ago, then 11 months ago, then 10 months ago etc.
But they just keep on going despite the fierce opposition from the 1%.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)if everyone who is even slightly critical of the OWS is a member.
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)"data point that I don't care to argue against."
/if I was one of those evil 1%ers eager to get people to shut up with the whole radical reform idea I wouldn't try to get average people to love me for being rich. That just won't happen. Instead I'd organize a "grassroots" movement against the super wealthy and have them act in such an annoying and childish manner all the while spouting rhetoric against me that they effectively discredit any real movement before it can even begin to threaten my position. So have people scream "tax reform!" while shitting in public parks. That way people in suits who might organize and actually achieve said tax reform are turned away from this increasingly sidelined and fringe group.
//I'm not saying that's what the OWS is. But I scratch my head to see how it could have more effectively served the 1% if it were a conspiracy on their behalf.
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)they're accused of being paid shills for the 1%, of ignorantly repeating talking points that presumably aren't true, and the like.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)I'm absolutely convinced that astroturfing and psy-ops happens on DU every day.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)Bragi
(7,650 posts)It was a tactic that -- long term -- few people could participate in, that was easy for the media to ignore, and that the 1 per cent could use their security apparatus to attack, disperse and dismantle.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)They did not disperse. In fact they managed to not only remain in the public square for far longer than they intended, they occupied public squares across the country and the globe, which they had NOT intended.
So they far exceeded their initial goals which were to remain for about two weeks in just one public square in NYC.
Now they are all over the world. And they have to decide what they want to do with this unexpected success as they enter a not even expected, second year.
The social media is where OWS is and was from the beginning. Too bad you still rely on the MSM for your news. I thought everyone knew by now that that is the last place to look for news.
tama
(9,137 posts)it's not just the means but also the whole purpose: democracy.
What has failed is representative system and 'leaders'. Let's try democracy instead.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)So many wonderful things resulted from, and evolved from, the Occupy tactic!
Because of your apparent great love and respect for Wall St., Banksters, and the Military Industrial Complex, you probably won't view Occupy's leading role in the demise of ALEC, or the demise of ALEC, as successes. But, oh well...
But for Occupiers, and other liberals/progressives around the world, the collapse of ALEC is an event that elicits great joy.
NEW YORK -- In cities around the country today, hundreds of Occupy protestors gathered for what the movement described in a release as its "largest coordinated action this year."
Since a wave of nationwide evictions effectively ended the movement's tent-city phase three months ago, Occupy activists have been trying to regain momentum. It's unclear whether today's event lived up to those expectations, but its organizers presented it as an important step forward.
Five more corporations have severed ties with the secretive, right-wing American Legislative Exchange Council, known as ALEC. The group has come under increasing scrutiny in recent months as the public has become aware of its role in advancing the "Stand Your Ground" gun law initially cited to protect Trayvon Martins killer in Florida. The organization has pushed voter suppression bills, union-busting policies and other controversial legislation. The future of ALEC is now more precarious than ever before. A grand total of 25 corporations have dropped ALEC membership, as well as four major nonprofit organizations and 55 elected officials. Were joined by Lisa Graves, executive director of the Center for Media and Democracy, which created ALEC Exposed, a website showcasing more than 800 of the groups model bills.
http://www.democracynow.org/2012/7/11/corporate_exodus_continues_from_alec_as
Published: Saturday 15 September 2012
With controversial and sometimes shady dealings being taking place between lobbyists and congress, big corporations are starting to pick up on the dangers of being associated with polarized lobbying bodies. The New Jersey News reports that the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC, lost the membership of another multi-billion dollar corporation yesterday:
http://www.nationofchange.org/alec-s-membership-dropping-flies-1347715368
Have a Nice Day!
Bragi
(7,650 posts)Indeed, you outed me. I've been quietly hanging around here for a decade secretly waiting to demonstrate my "great love and respect for Wall St., Banksters, and the Military Industrial Complex." Damn.
Question: So, did the dozens of non-doctrinaire, open-minded people like yourself who attended the Occupy nostalgia parties this past week talk any about the missing hundreds of thousands who participated a year ago, but who have disappeared during your year of unparalleled success? No, eh.
Anyway, thanks for making my point, which is that Occupy may have appealed to the militant cadre who took it over, but it was an unsustainable long-term tactic, and the 99 per cent movement for social and economic equality needs a different, more diverse, and more inclusive strategy.
You have a good day now.
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)as well as the thousands of folks in protest in cities across America...the 99% are in solidarity against the corporate take over of America..not against each other
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)also:
They KNOW these 'blocking the sidewalk' arrests are going to be thrown out of court now, as they have been all year, but they are still violating people's 1st Amendment rights anyhow.
Bloomberg's army is working for the 1% as always.
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)with the whole world watching as an army of heavily armed sometimes paramilitary cops whose faces no one could see, were ready to and nearly did kill several protesters, rather than allow them to exercise their right to free speech.
I see the comments here and elsewhere claiming how much better we are in the US than other countries, because we allow people to say whatever they want.
Not true, you can burn a Koran sure, but you cannot criticize Wall Street.
tama
(9,137 posts)That's the purpose of these actions of state terrorism. But we just can't fear control us, and will not.
Bragi
(7,650 posts)I am just disappointed that Occupy fizzled out, and the 99 per cent movement went from being huge thing with momentum to an irrelevant thing, fading away. I think it's worth asking why. - YF
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)this am people in wheelchairs were arrested..and you ask WHY ..105 people were arrested this am..people have been injured while out on the streets representing most of us..and you ask why..turn off the mainstream media and turn on an occupy livestream and you will understand why
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)tactics changed.
I will share with you where the local OSD (and allied groups) who still meet in GA's have gone to.
Some are inside the Democratic Party. I know, shocking all and all and we have two actually... shocking I know, running for office, they made it through the primaries. Two congressional offices in fact. I doubt they will win... arterial red blood districts, but they are running... they are running where the party refuses to run anybody.
Some are working in the a slurry of local issues, organizing people, organizing marches when needed, TTP was a good example, this afternoon will be another good example.
More than a few are working the barrios helping the community.
The political pressure was such on the foreclosure issue that the Kamala Harris actually credited Occupy for quite a bit of the inspiration\ pressure for the California Homeowner Bill of Rights.
They are still here, they are just NOT camping around, which was a major point of contention, from you iirc... but even my local mayor admits, they are huge headache to the local power structure. Of course sort of on background... he ran when hubby asked about the pension mess and if he'd like his to be taken away by the voters.
And as I said, I am looking forwards to my afternoon run while covering a march they are holding... yes, taking all those photographs is a hell of a workout. Hey, as hot as it is, dress light, for a run.
julian09
(1,435 posts)to start, then go after the obstructionists, not just here and there but everywhere. There is nothing lower in the polls, than congress.
They have a huge target there, they are not like tea party and shouldn't be adverse to opposing them.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Case tests "Pruneyard" Supreme Court Decision when applied to public areas
September 14, 2012 (San Diego) El Cajon activist Ray Lutz, founder of the watchdog Citizens Oversight organization, filed suit on Sept. 13, 2012, alleging a false arrest on November 29, 2011, while he was registering voters in San Diego's Civic Center Plaza, effectively the town square of San Diego.
The suit named three defendants explicily: the City of San Diego, Police officer Tony Lessa, who arrested Lutz, and CBRE, "CB Richard Ellis Group" that manages the Civic Center Plaza Office Building and that performed a citizen's arrest for trespassing. The suit also names 25 John Does to allow for additional defendants to be named as determined by discovery.
Case #37-2012-00103865-CU-CR-CTL is assigned to Judge Denton. Attorney Bryan Pease is handling the case, Details can be found on this web page:
http://www.copswiki.org/Common/VoterRegistrationArrestOfRayLutz. View Lutzs statement here: http://www.copswiki.org/Common/M1210 The video of the arrest is here:
http://www.eastcountymagazine.org/node/11052
Who the hell told you they have not?
julian09
(1,435 posts)Since Nov 29/2011 how many have they done? Have they assisted people who may need help getting places and explaning new requirements to register? Is Ray Lutz founder of the watchdog Citizen Oversight organization, also an Occupy member? Well I hope that they find in his favor.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)he ran for office locally, before occupy, and multiple Occupy around the country have been doing things like this... aka registering voters.
The problem, and partially it is occupy's fault, long story, the major media refuses to cover what Occupy have been up to... end of discussion, period, full stop.
But seriously, Occupy the Barrio and Occupy the hood have been about registering voters across the nation, among other things.
But when the local NBC station, two blocks from Civic Center, (Freedom Plaza) only had reporters come get coffee, from time to time, but never had a story on the air. And when you have channel Eight refer to Occupy as "weird, and strange," well there you have it.
The fair coverage, where any has occurred, has happened at indie papers, like the one I freelance at. Why indie media NEEDS FREAKING DONATIONS.
Oh and this is shocking, but I forgot, the local FOX affiliate gets props for decent coverage.
tama
(9,137 posts)(where they are running to we don't necessary want to follow), go through them, over them, under them. I know this can be hard to accept, but Occupy is about democracy, and Democratic party is one of the main obstructionists. If you want to take over the party and return it to people from corporations, fine, I stand in solidarity. If you want to do your thing and go round or through the Democratic party and give its obstructions no attention, fine, I stand in solidarity.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Yup, you are right.
You would do well to find out though where they have gone and what they have been up to though.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I enjoyed the weekend Occupy events in D/FW... didn't seem dead, but then again, I don't pretend to be a doctor either..
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)A crowd of about 50 barged into the lobby of the 4 New York Plaza, which houses JPMorgan Chase as well as the Daily News and demanded to speak to bank officials. About eight of them were arrested.
"Were here protesting financial terrorism. The financial mafia," said Yates McKee, 32, as he was loaded into the back of a police van.
Good photos at the link ...
tama
(9,137 posts)I heard that people wearing suits and with NY id. went into the building and held mic check. All I know is word from the street.
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)... Occupy is immortal. You can't kill an idea.
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)seeing peoplle celebrating freedom instead of getting maced or beaten for a change. The girl to me looked like a flame dancing lighting up the darkness.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)It's like the Friday the 13th movies - Occupy is Jason. Just when everybody thinks Occupy was killed, "MIC CHECK!"
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Lol!
Magoo48
(4,709 posts)a powerful lamp showing the correct path. Occupy has the potential to completely derail the statis-que and "they" at the top know it. We mature, we learn, we occupy. May we still be celebrating this day in 100 years...peace
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)successful this Global Movement has been so far. The very last thing they wanted was for the people to wake up and start paying attention to what they've been up to for the past several decades.
I never thought this would still be happening one year later either. It was enough at the time that people were not just demonstrating for a day, but that they planned to be there for at least two weeks. The fact that it spread so quickly was a sign that the people did know what was going on, they just didn't have a way of letting it be known until Sept. 17th last year! Keep up the good work
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)majority ARE part of OWS and don't waste much here anymore arguing with supporters of the 1%. That is just a waste of their valuable time and it's clear their minds cannot be changed, because they oppose any opposition to the current system.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)my Iggy list has grown.
It gets to the point that you really stop wasting your time.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Exactly, that is why you don't see much about OWS on DU anymore. There is far too much to do in RL and elsewhere where the news of OWS is factual, than to waste time arguing with anti-Social Justice movements.
DU is not the place to find info on this huge movement, which has led the opposers to believe it went away! They must be very disappointed today!
These kinds of forums are mainly for partisan politics which is why the major movements that have arisen around the world today and are growing, did not use them but went instead to the Social Media which is extremely successful.
.
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)I can guarantee you if I posted something about Palin or Joe Scarborough or O Reilly there would be lots of interest. I already know that. Hell will freeze over before I do that or even care about any of them.
These folks are not going to jail or protesting in vain. They give me hope. More hope than anything else. I cant be in the streets right now although the folks in wheelchairs are an inspiration to me. I don't have a wheelchair but walking is difficult. I'd make it about one half block and then be done..but I am so there in heart and spirit.
Naysayers..well, they don't represent me and never have.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)with a local-ish member of council who pleaded guilty to two federal counts... I did not bother, nor the rest of the local media did, to write party allegiance. Everybody locally KNOWS IT... it is not relevant to the story. If I bothered with that... it would have remained alive for a lot longer... due to the partisan sentiment... embezzlement just takes a whole different fervor when parties are mentioned.
Alas the office, in theory, is non-partisan. So none of us bothered.
I know, bad reporters. No cookie for me...
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)destroying this nation and many others, hope. They are absolutely wonderful, I feel so proud of them as before OWS, I thought that the American were in a coma, that there was no hope of them ever standing up for themselves.
Naysayers represent the far right who are reacting out of fear. And they don't represent most Americans.
tama
(9,137 posts)count your self in the 99,999...%. We are all included in the Occupy 'us'.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)the issues that people all over the world are outraged over, are addressed.
Scenes last night from Zuccotti Park:
.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Rosh Hashanah services were held in the Park last night:
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Goosebumps...last year the ram's horn rand for Yom Kipur.