Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

hack89

(39,171 posts)
2. I hate bad cherry picked history
Wed Jun 17, 2020, 12:10 PM
Jun 2020

The Second Confederate Navy Jack was a rectangular cousin of the Confederate Army's battle flag and was in use from 1863 until 1865. It existed in a variety of dimensions and sizes, despite the CSN's detailed naval regulations. The blue color of the diagonal saltire's "Southern Cross" was much lighter than the dark blue of the battle flag.


Not all battle flags were square.

An elongated version of the Battle Flag of the Army of Tennessee, and similar to The Second Confederate Navy Jack, in use from 1863 until 1865, although with the darker blue field of the Army's battle flag.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flags_of_the_Confederate_States_of_America#Battle_flag

So yes, most confederate soldiers fought under what we consider the confederate flag, both square and rectangular. There is a reason it was so popular then and was adopted by ex-soldiers.
 

packman

(16,296 posts)
3. Ahh- The post has nothing to do with square or rectangular
Wed Jun 17, 2020, 12:14 PM
Jun 2020


But thanks for the history lesson

This should be the Confed flag if one is going to wave one:

hack89

(39,171 posts)
4. The basic facts are wrong
Wed Jun 17, 2020, 12:19 PM
Jun 2020

the Navy Jack is a red herring and it conflates the national flag of the confederacy and the battle flag.

It makes perfect sense that ex-soldiers would revere the battle flag - that is the flag they fought under and many of their comrades died under.

The basic point of the OP is wrong.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
13. But itself can seem both awkward and disingenuous (at best)...
Wed Jun 17, 2020, 06:32 PM
Jun 2020

when consistently done to support only one general narrative rather than all.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
14. I don't support the Confederate flag
Wed Jun 17, 2020, 07:16 PM
Jun 2020

It is a southern racist symbol. I am a northern progressive- I hate that flag.

Caliman73

(11,744 posts)
10. All of the flags were the flags of traitors, or of a hostile nation, period.
Wed Jun 17, 2020, 12:42 PM
Jun 2020

No other real way of looking at it. The Confederacy stated that they were their own government, had their constitution, money, etc... It was never recognized by the US, or any other country as legitimate. Therefore they were traitors who took up arms against their own country, to defend the institution of slavery.

If we grant that they formed their own country then their "heritage" is not part of the United States heritage and would be akin to Japanese people celebrating Pearl Harbor Day pro Japanese, or German people celebrating WWI from the perspective of the Wehrmacht.

Every single flag made, used, etc... was the flag of either traitors or enemy combatants and should not be celebrated in the United States.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Another lie - "It's herit...