Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Deeply disturbing': New York Supreme Court judge rules protesters can be detained indefinitely
A New York State Supreme Court judge on Thursday rejected a petition seeking the immediate release of hundreds of protesters who had been held by the New York Police Department for more than 24 hours, ruling that extraordinary circumstances justify indefinite detention.
It is a crisis within a crisis, wrote Justice James Burke in his ruling. All writs are denied.
Burkes decision was met with alarm by New York lawmakers and activists who immediately condemned the ruling as an unlawful suspension of the right of habeas corpus, which requires the government to justify detention of a person before a court. Hundreds of New Yorkers have been arrested in recent days during mass protests over the May 25 killing of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police officers.
The NYPD has no excuses with its 38,000 police officers and the best technology in the world, with all the money they are being given. They have no excuse to not process them in a timely manner.
Marlen Bodden, Legal Aid Society
More
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/06/deeply-disturbing-new-york-supreme-court-judge-rules-protesters-can-be-detained-indefinitely/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1350 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (20)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Deeply disturbing': New York Supreme Court judge rules protesters can be detained indefinitely (Original Post)
LiberalArkie
Jun 2020
OP
Just to be clear: in NY the Supreme Court is the trial level court, not the highest court.
malchickiwick
Jun 2020
#1
malchickiwick
(1,474 posts)1. Just to be clear: in NY the Supreme Court is the trial level court, not the highest court.
So this is essentially just the decision of a district court judge, and thus can be appealed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court
jorgevlorgan
(8,300 posts)4. good to know. thank you so much!
Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)9. Thanks.
I was just about to jump in to add that.
Nevilledog
(51,120 posts)2. Due Process says what?
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,629 posts)3. That is a horrible miscarriage of justice.
So what do they do next? The USSC?
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)6. Fortunately, this is the trial level court in the state, not the usual "Supreme" court. So it'll be
appealed.
Disgusting ruling.
marybourg
(12,633 posts)5. The judge did not rule that anyone can be held "indefinately"
This is now -common headline writers hyperbole, magnified by it being a Rawstory article.
The law mandating release in 24 hours does contain an exception for extraordinary circumstances. The city claimed, and the judge agreed that the court system working from home in the pandemic and then being confronted with mass arrests was indeed an extraordinary circumstance. This is bad for everyone involved, but does not require a sh*t-stirring Rawstory to make it worse.
LiberalArkie
(15,719 posts)8. So as soon as Covid is over they can be released on bail?
Progressive dog
(6,904 posts)7. In NY, the highest court is
the Court of Appeals.