Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalArkie

(15,719 posts)
Fri Jun 5, 2020, 02:48 PM Jun 2020

'Deeply disturbing': New York Supreme Court judge rules protesters can be detained indefinitely



A New York State Supreme Court judge on Thursday rejected a petition seeking the immediate release of hundreds of protesters who had been held by the New York Police Department for more than 24 hours, ruling that extraordinary circumstances justify indefinite detention.

“It is a crisis within a crisis,” wrote Justice James Burke in his ruling. “All writs are denied.”

Burke’s decision was met with alarm by New York lawmakers and activists who immediately condemned the ruling as an unlawful suspension of the right of habeas corpus, which requires the government to justify detention of a person before a court. Hundreds of New Yorkers have been arrested in recent days during mass protests over the May 25 killing of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police officers.

“The NYPD has no excuses with its 38,000 police officers and the best technology in the world, with all the money they are being given. They have no excuse to not process them in a timely manner.”
—Marlen Bodden, Legal Aid Society

More

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/06/deeply-disturbing-new-york-supreme-court-judge-rules-protesters-can-be-detained-indefinitely/
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Deeply disturbing': New York Supreme Court judge rules protesters can be detained indefinitely (Original Post) LiberalArkie Jun 2020 OP
Just to be clear: in NY the Supreme Court is the trial level court, not the highest court. malchickiwick Jun 2020 #1
good to know. thank you so much! jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #4
Thanks. Ms. Toad Jun 2020 #9
Due Process says what? Nevilledog Jun 2020 #2
That is a horrible miscarriage of justice. CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2020 #3
Fortunately, this is the trial level court in the state, not the usual "Supreme" court. So it'll be NYC Liberal Jun 2020 #6
The judge did not rule that anyone can be held "indefinately" marybourg Jun 2020 #5
So as soon as Covid is over they can be released on bail? LiberalArkie Jun 2020 #8
In NY, the highest court is Progressive dog Jun 2020 #7

malchickiwick

(1,474 posts)
1. Just to be clear: in NY the Supreme Court is the trial level court, not the highest court.
Fri Jun 5, 2020, 02:55 PM
Jun 2020

So this is essentially just the decision of a district court judge, and thus can be appealed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
6. Fortunately, this is the trial level court in the state, not the usual "Supreme" court. So it'll be
Fri Jun 5, 2020, 03:29 PM
Jun 2020

appealed.

Disgusting ruling.

marybourg

(12,633 posts)
5. The judge did not rule that anyone can be held "indefinately"
Fri Jun 5, 2020, 03:24 PM
Jun 2020

This is now -common headline writer’s hyperbole, magnified by it being a Rawstory” article.

The law mandating release in 24 hours does contain an exception for extraordinary circumstances. The city claimed, and the judge agreed that the court system working from home in the pandemic and then being confronted with mass arrests was indeed an extraordinary circumstance. This is bad for everyone involved, but does not require a sh*t-stirring Rawstory to make it worse.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Deeply disturbing': New ...