Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT not only had staffers angry about Tom Cotton opinion piece, but most cancellations per hour ever (Original Post) highplainsdem Jun 2020 OP
it was a terrible decision barbtries Jun 2020 #1
There are consequences to white privilege. sheshe2 Jun 2020 #2
WTF NYT ?! ... The op ed was dangerous by itself uponit7771 Jun 2020 #3
Brilliant! Keep UP your Gaslighting BULLSHIT, NYT.. Cha Jun 2020 #4
I never subscribed. I change IPs and clear cookies for unlimited viewing. AmericanCanuck Jun 2020 #5
Taking something without paying, isn't that looting/stealing? Bluepinky Jun 2020 #9
Too bad, so sad, NYT. Maybe think about finally getting rid of Dean Baquet. crickets Jun 2020 #6
Thank you for that link to a great read! scarletwoman Jun 2020 #7
Allowing Cotton to vent his evil in that column was inexcusable DFW Jun 2020 #8
As much as I support the First Amendment/Freedom of the Press, no_hypocrisy Jun 2020 #10

barbtries

(28,798 posts)
1. it was a terrible decision
Thu Jun 4, 2020, 10:25 PM
Jun 2020

to print something so incendiary and unconstitutional offered up as an opinion piece. Bad, bad decision NYT.

Cha

(297,303 posts)
4. Brilliant! Keep UP your Gaslighting BULLSHIT, NYT..
Thu Jun 4, 2020, 11:06 PM
Jun 2020

KEEP Digging for those Cancellations!

Good new, hpd.. TY!

crickets

(25,981 posts)
6. Too bad, so sad, NYT. Maybe think about finally getting rid of Dean Baquet.
Fri Jun 5, 2020, 12:35 AM
Jun 2020
Around 10 p.m., Times employees put out a public statement through their union excoriating management for its “irresponsible choice” in publishing the column and for “promoting hate.”


Good for them.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
7. Thank you for that link to a great read!
Fri Jun 5, 2020, 04:54 AM
Jun 2020

I especially loved that hilarious kicker at the end:

Still, even as the conflict raged, there were a few current Times opinion employees who remained proud of their paper’s call for the military to suppress domestic protests.

David Brooks
@nytdavidbrooks
I believe in democracy. I believe in a free press. I believe in open debate. I love it when my newspaper prints pieces I disagree with. It causes me to think.
8:42 PM · Jun 3, 2020

Good ol' David Brooks - thinks he's so intelligent and high-minded, but he's just another ratbastard hack.

DFW

(54,405 posts)
8. Allowing Cotton to vent his evil in that column was inexcusable
Fri Jun 5, 2020, 05:14 AM
Jun 2020

I'm glad my dad, Helen Thomas and Scotty Reston never lived to see it. They were journalists of another era entirely.

no_hypocrisy

(46,121 posts)
10. As much as I support the First Amendment/Freedom of the Press,
Fri Jun 5, 2020, 08:02 AM
Jun 2020

the editor exists for a reason: to filter misleading and false statements disguised as facts. A newspaper should have information that is reliable.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT not only had staffers...