Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUS warns Los Angeles stay-at-home extension could be illegal
Source: Associated Press
US warns Los Angeles stay-at-home extension could be illegal
By BRIAN MELLEY
May 23, 2020
LOS ANGELES (AP) The U.S. Department of Justice on Friday warned the mayor of Los Angeles and the countys top health officer that an extension of the coronavirus stay-at-home order may be unlawful.
The vague letter sent to Mayor Eric Garcetti and LA County Public Health Director Barbara Ferrer did not spell out any specific violations, but noted concern about statements both had made publicly that restrictions may be prolonged without a vaccine.
Reports of your recent public statements indicate that you suggested the possibility of long-term lockdown of the residents in the city and county of Los Angeles, regardless of the legal justification for such restrictions, Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband wrote. We remain concerned about what may be an arbitrary and heavy-handed approach to continuing stay-at-home requirements.
Dreiband acknowledged that Garcetti had broad authority to protect residents during the pandemic.
Garcetti said the city would be guided by science and data rather than politics. He said the citys 7-day average of deaths is holding and he feels confident about measures the city is taking.
-snip-
By BRIAN MELLEY
May 23, 2020
LOS ANGELES (AP) The U.S. Department of Justice on Friday warned the mayor of Los Angeles and the countys top health officer that an extension of the coronavirus stay-at-home order may be unlawful.
The vague letter sent to Mayor Eric Garcetti and LA County Public Health Director Barbara Ferrer did not spell out any specific violations, but noted concern about statements both had made publicly that restrictions may be prolonged without a vaccine.
Reports of your recent public statements indicate that you suggested the possibility of long-term lockdown of the residents in the city and county of Los Angeles, regardless of the legal justification for such restrictions, Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband wrote. We remain concerned about what may be an arbitrary and heavy-handed approach to continuing stay-at-home requirements.
Dreiband acknowledged that Garcetti had broad authority to protect residents during the pandemic.
Garcetti said the city would be guided by science and data rather than politics. He said the citys 7-day average of deaths is holding and he feels confident about measures the city is taking.
-snip-
Read more: https://apnews.com/8437b467a9fe5f820dc5c4c9eacb63cb
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 880 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US warns Los Angeles stay-at-home extension could be illegal (Original Post)
Eugene
May 2020
OP
"We think acknowledging an on-going public health emergency may make Plumpty Trumpty look bad!"
struggle4progress
May 2020
#1
struggle4progress
(118,320 posts)1. "We think acknowledging an on-going public health emergency may make Plumpty Trumpty look bad!"
empedocles
(15,751 posts)2. Hate that 'US warns' - it's just trump and Ho barr yapping.
SCOTUS said to be [very skeptical] when trump toadies argued to the Supreme Court - 'the president cannot be investigated' for crimes.
dweller
(23,649 posts)3. i heard a snippet on this on natl news this morning
they mentioned Cali and 1 other state,
they were to report fully ltr in newscast, but i missed it
✌🏼
mucifer
(23,558 posts)4. They are threatening us here in Illinois, too
Bayard
(22,123 posts)5. Eric Dreiband:
Bite me.
Or what? Its not up to the feds.
SWBTATTReg
(22,156 posts)6. Of course it's vague. Like all other rump associated actions, everything is hidden away or ...
distorted totally to hid the truth. Unfortunately this time around, people are getting ill or dying.