Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI repeat: It is illegal for Trump's acting IG to have started working at the State Department.
I REPEAT:
IT IS ILLEGAL FOR TRUMP'S ACTING IG TO HAVE STARTED WORKING AT THE STATE DEPARTMENT THIS WEEK. THE LAW FORBIDS REMOVAL OF AN IG DURING THE 30-DAY NOTICE PERIOD. IF EVEN FOUR SENATE REPUBLICANS CARED ABOUT LAWS, THEY WOULD STOP THIS BY BLOCKING TRUMP'S NOMINEES. GOT IT?
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
14 replies, 3187 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (92)
ReplyReply to this post
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I repeat: It is illegal for Trump's acting IG to have started working at the State Department. (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2020
OP
Pompeo's new acting inspector general is already creating a conflict of interest
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2020
#2
trump is a lawless 'president'. Laws do not apply to him or anyone in his administration.
spanone
May 2020
#3
K&R, But Red Don is not going to illegally affect the upcoming election in his favor.
uponit7771
May 2020
#6
MSM Headline "Woops he did it again! Isn't that cute? How very special of him."
Ford_Prefect
May 2020
#9
Every day another bad news story about this administration's disregard for Rule of Law.
NoRoadUntravelled
May 2020
#13
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)1. Laws? We don't need no stinkin' laws.
When did doing something illegal ever bother either Fat Nixon's administration or the GOP senators?
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,490 posts)2. Pompeo's new acting inspector general is already creating a conflict of interest
Global Opinions
Pompeos new acting inspector general is already creating a conflict of interest
By Josh Rogin
Columnist
May 20, 2020 at 5:36 p.m. EDT
On Friday, President Trump announced the firing of State Department Inspector General Steve Linick, based on the recommendation of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, a move that surprised official Washington and infuriated Democrats. Now, there is additional concern about Linicks replacement, Stephen Akard, who is already on the job and is also keeping his existing State Department position, setting up a clear conflict of interest.
According to the law, the administration must notify Congress 30 days in advance before firing an inspector general. But multiple sources told me that Linicks last day was Friday, the same day Congress learned about his ouster. Akard showed up at the office on Monday morning and immediately assumed the bosss role. Yet Akard is keeping his job as the head of the State Departments Office of Foreign Missions, a Senate-confirmed political appointee position he has held since September. Adding the inspector generals job to his duties essentially means he will be overseeing himself.
The independence of inspectors general is paramount. Embedding a political ally to serve as IG who is still working in the very agency they are supposed to oversee is very problematic and an affront to that independence, Sen. Robert Menendez (N.J.), the ranking Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, told me. I have trouble seeing how Ambassador Akard could fulfill those duties effectively given the circumstances and without stepping down from his current role.
The State Department did not respond to a request for comment.
{snip}
Josh Rogin
Josh Rogin is a columnist for the Global Opinions section of The Washington Post. He writes about foreign policy and national security. Rogin is also a political analyst for CNN. He previously worked for Bloomberg View, the Daily Beast, Foreign Policy, Congressional Quarterly, Federal Computer Week and Japan's Asahi Shimbun newspaper. Follow https://twitter.com/joshrogin
Pompeos new acting inspector general is already creating a conflict of interest
By Josh Rogin
Columnist
May 20, 2020 at 5:36 p.m. EDT
On Friday, President Trump announced the firing of State Department Inspector General Steve Linick, based on the recommendation of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, a move that surprised official Washington and infuriated Democrats. Now, there is additional concern about Linicks replacement, Stephen Akard, who is already on the job and is also keeping his existing State Department position, setting up a clear conflict of interest.
According to the law, the administration must notify Congress 30 days in advance before firing an inspector general. But multiple sources told me that Linicks last day was Friday, the same day Congress learned about his ouster. Akard showed up at the office on Monday morning and immediately assumed the bosss role. Yet Akard is keeping his job as the head of the State Departments Office of Foreign Missions, a Senate-confirmed political appointee position he has held since September. Adding the inspector generals job to his duties essentially means he will be overseeing himself.
The independence of inspectors general is paramount. Embedding a political ally to serve as IG who is still working in the very agency they are supposed to oversee is very problematic and an affront to that independence, Sen. Robert Menendez (N.J.), the ranking Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, told me. I have trouble seeing how Ambassador Akard could fulfill those duties effectively given the circumstances and without stepping down from his current role.
The State Department did not respond to a request for comment.
{snip}
Josh Rogin
Josh Rogin is a columnist for the Global Opinions section of The Washington Post. He writes about foreign policy and national security. Rogin is also a political analyst for CNN. He previously worked for Bloomberg View, the Daily Beast, Foreign Policy, Congressional Quarterly, Federal Computer Week and Japan's Asahi Shimbun newspaper. Follow https://twitter.com/joshrogin
spanone
(135,844 posts)3. trump is a lawless 'president'. Laws do not apply to him or anyone in his administration.
The thing with laws is, if no one enforces them, then they are just words on paper.
No one is enforcing any laws pertaining to trump & co.
We're closer to a dictatorship than our democracy has ever been.
ScratchCat
(1,990 posts)4. Then why would the Democrats
even participate in the confirmation? Don't participate and state that its illegal. WTF is wrong with Democrats? Will they not learn their lesson from the Barr nomination?
czarjak
(11,278 posts)5. Being sin-free comes with perks?
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)6. K&R, But Red Don is not going to illegally affect the upcoming election in his favor.
samsingh
(17,599 posts)7. he does alot of illegal stuff and NO ONE stops him
Ford_Prefect
(7,901 posts)9. MSM Headline "Woops he did it again! Isn't that cute? How very special of him."
yaesu
(8,020 posts)8. there are no laws in a lawless society that is, this fascist state. nt
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)10. The vote to not hear witnesses was a grant of impunity.
We currently live in an Autocracy.
calimary
(81,322 posts)11. The mild-mannered Walter Shaub is SHOUTING!
Now that's a first (I think). I have not seen that from him before.
FakeNoose
(32,645 posts)12. It's clear to me that this is morally wrong and illegal
The appointment should have gone to the only person with the experience and qualifications to do the job correctly, namely Jared Kushner.
NoRoadUntravelled
(2,626 posts)13. Every day another bad news story about this administration's disregard for Rule of Law.
onenote
(42,714 posts)14. Probably, but its pretty complicated