General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRed Alert. Losing California and Wisconsin by these margins should be viewed as alarming
Interested in the analysis of exit polls and turn out numbers. What was the dynamic of mail in voting. What was the extent of voter turn out. What were the impacts of the economy vs public safety messaging on both sides. What was Trump's approval rating in these districts as compared to the approval of the governor. ........... We ignore this at our peril.
uponit7771
(90,348 posts)... group.
FM123
(10,054 posts)By the way, welcome to DU
BGBD
(3,282 posts)shouldn't worry you at all. That is a deeply red district and the margin is way down. if that is the result in November Biden will win Wisconsin easily.
Trump won there by 21.
Cha
(297,447 posts)stopbush
(24,396 posts)greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,628 posts)Nice try.
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)SlogginThroughIt
(1,977 posts)I hear this all the time but what is the answer for it?
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)of conspiracy and collusion but it's like we just rolled over. We could do a lot of good by
staging large demonstrations. It's like we all turned into complacent zombies. States could step up
with investigations and prosecutions. Like Hendirx said, there's got to be someway outta here. I wish I had a better answer.
Indykatie
(3,697 posts)CA-25 had been in GOP hands for decades until Dems won it in the 2018 wave. As for the WI seat, Trump won the district by 21 points. That's right 21 freaking points. Dems lost in the special election by 15. We may have a chance to re-take CA-25 in Nov if we have tremendous turn-out but clearly our 2018 win was an anomaly for the district. It's fine to do a deeper dive but your concern seems a little over the top given the history of these 2 districts.
FloridaBlues
(4,008 posts)brooklynite
(94,667 posts)2018 was an anomaly in CA-25, and WI-7 was a Republican seat.
Wounded Bear
(58,681 posts)that's likely to send precious resources after frivolous ideas.
Sure, let's find out the facts, etc. But the national trend hasn't really changed based on 2 races in red areas.
Response to Wounded Bear (Reply #13)
Name removed Message auto-removed
mercuryblues
(14,537 posts)on the Graham/Harrison election. What are you hearing, that you can share publically?
Harrison is neck and neck in polling with Graham. Last week a BIG Graham donor jumped ship and endorsed Harrison. Forgot the guys name but he is a CEO of SC Michelin. He also wrote an excoriating OpEd on Graham.
https://www.greenvilleonline.com/story/opinion/2020/05/10/opinion-why-endorse-challenger-jaime-harrison-over-sen-lindsey-graham/3083562001/
msongs
(67,430 posts)Hekate
(90,758 posts)Do share your sources, Edwcraig.
LeftInTX
(25,465 posts)The Democrat was running against a state senator.
Of course, it would be great if she won.
I think if she had held elected office previously, it would have helped.
But that area is just plain ole, old with old people.
It's the home of national forests where politics is mostly local and focuses on the local DNR and electric companies. (Utilities or lack of them are a big thing up there)
Me calling my dad: "Dad we don't have internet up here"
Dad: "I will call so and so"
Two weeks later, still no internet.
Me calling my dad: "Dad the power is out up here?"
Dad: "Call so and so"
Me: Calling so and so etc...
I'm not too worried about that race.