Two things stood out to me in the interview with Tara

[pink]

Firstly, there was the discussion of the underwear she was wearing at the time. Apparently she was wearing crotchless lingerie. She said that the reason she was wearing it was because she was seeing her boyfriend after work. I cannot imagine a normal woman working in an office situation wearing crotchless underwear.

Secondly, she said that she was broke. Can you imagine a better way to make money than to sell your story (truthful or otherwise) just before someone was about to run for president. If the incident happened, it was 27 years ago.

Personally, I dont care if she was "assaulted", all she is really doing is she is trying to deprive the American people the chance of having a decent government.

[CaliforniaPeggy]

1. Yes, her timing is suspicious. Why wait?

Except we know that she's trying to discredit Joe so he'll lose.

BTW, the word you want is "crotchless."

[pink]

5. Thanks Peggy

I was wondering why it kept coming up on spellcheck as wrong.

[CaliforniaPeggy]

10. Ah, no worries!

The ONE class I always had A's in was spelling, lol!

[Rorey]

16. I beat out my entire class to go to the county spelling bee

And I know for a fact that "crotchless" wasn't one of the words on the study list.

Your school sounds like it was a lot more fun than mine.

[CaliforniaPeggy]

19. I'm sure it wasn't!! On the list, I mean.

It wasn't on any spelling list at any of my schools either!

I am very well educated, I'll have you know!

[Rorey]

22. I'm still laughing at the thought of it

I'm just kidding around. It's one of those nights for me.

[CaliforniaPeggy]

26. Kidding is good, Rorey!

[3Hotdogs]

31. ...and that word was on page 18 of your 8th grade spelling book?

[CaliforniaPeggy]

32. Of COURSE it was.

[Alex4Martinez]

17. WTH, Peggy? Isn't the crotch like the whole reason a panty exists?

I mean the waistband and other bits only serve to hold a crotch piece of fabric, amiright?

Sheesh!

[Mike Nelson]

2. Well...

... I did not see the interview... but I agree crotchless underwear is not worn during the work day because sex is planned after work.

[Merlot]

7. There is no way to know how many people wear "unusual" undergarments to work.

[scarytomcat]

44. or any at all

What's the point?

[Codeine]

36. Evidently you and I travel in entirely different circles. nt

[mopinko]

3. what struck me- who tf does she think she is

saying joe should resign. rly, just dont vote for him, asshole.
the FUCKING.VOTERS. put him at the top of the ticket. why the fuck do you think anyone gives 2 shits about what you think?

also, what a bald faced fucking liar.

[pink]

8. Do you remember how long she continued to work there after the "incident".

If it was such a traumatic experience, one would think that she could not handle working there one minute longer.

[msongs]

4. a well funded, well coordinated and scripted campaign with full trump support . hmmm

[johnp3907]

6. "What were you wearing?"

[pink]

12. In my working days in an office enviroment

I never saw the need to wear crotchless underwear.

[Rorey]

20. The only reason to wear "real" underwear

I think the only reason to wear "real" underwear was for the crotch part.

[Maraya1969]

23. Besides, in those days women wore pantyhose to the office. Did no one ask her about that?

I suppose she could have been wearing a garter but those were mostly for sex at that point also.

[Hortensis]

46. THIS. In those days she couldn't have worked without

pantyhose without drawing unfavorable attention. Not in a clerical department in the basement, much less in a senator's offices.

And now it's crotchless panties. What next? Her foot hiked on a water fountain while she rebuckled her shoe?

[madaboutharry]

9. She said she was wearing crotchless underwear?

Wasn’t that convenient! And Joe Biden just happened to assault her on that particular day?

Give me a fucking break.

And one more thing, I would rather stick pins in my eyeballs than admit that there was a single day in my life that I wore crotchless underwear. Which, I was only vaguely aware actually existed.

[Boomerproud]

11. Crotchless underwear?

Uh huh. She has a (ridiculous) answer for everything doesn't she. Of course Joe Biden knew this before pushing her up against a hallway wall. Did the intrepid journalist Kelly follow up? Did she save said underwear like the Blue Dress?

[pink]

14. Kelly asked her if she was wearing crotchless underwear

and Tara kept answering by saying she was wearing lingerie. After a few to and fro's, she then said that she was wearing that because she was seeing her boyfriend after work. I saw the full interview on youtube. I cant see too many people shedding any tears for her.

[Olafjoy]

13. Crotchless underwear????

That is pure crap. You don’t wear crotchless panties to work. Unless your job calls for crotchless panties. So she was a big shopper at Frederick’s of Hollywood? You don’t buy crotchless panties at Macy’s. Victoria’s Secret either. No. Just no. I call BS on the C.P.s Her story is crap.

[pink]

15. You can watch it on youtube n/t

[Boomerproud]

18. Life is too short and precious to waste on this.

[eilen]

33. The Megan Kelly YouTube Channel is not a legitimate news outlet.

Relying on her "channel" for news --may as well watch the plandemic videos--yt videos are just not the place to get factual information.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

21. What is the point of crotchless underwear?

Isn't the rest of the underwear just there to hold the crotch in place? If you don't want a crotch, why not just go commando?

[Rorey]

25. She hasn't made any sense thus far

And this crotchless underwear thing doesn't make any sense either.

[Laura PourMeADrink]

39. Lol. It's a turn on. But how would Biden, if it happened, even know? I am starting

To think that she was obsessed with him and imagined/hoped for a tryst with him and he spurned her. Or he engaged but nothing like she purports. Why he hasn't said, unequivocally, that he never touched/kissed her, never. Or has he said that??

[Lucinda]

42. He did deny it. n/t

[scarytomcat]

45. sounding a lot like it

a crush on power

[brush]

24. Hahahahahaha! The story gets more unbelievable everyday.

Why didn't she come out of the woodwork in 2017 during the height of the @me_too movement when hundreds of other victims with provable stories stepped forward? Or in 2008 when Pres. Obama tapped Joe as his running mate? She didn't because the story hadn't occurred to her yet. And she knew Axelrod and Plouffe had thoroughly vetted Biden before he was announced as the VP candidate.

She's so full of crap, hope that off-shore account is stuffed full enough to live herself for the rest of her life.

[qazplm135]

27. so crotchless underwear in a dress

with no pantyhose...in the early 90s?

Come on. She wasn't doing that.

[Laura PourMeADrink]

40. Lol

[Hortensis]

47. Not in a U.S. Senator's office for sure.

Nor was she wearing mini skirts if she tries to claim that.

[Vdizzle]

28. Don't worry. I would put money on our side for a very

Illuminating October surprise. Something to do with Jeffrey Epstein and his confiscated safe of evidence. I think there will be plenty in there to show who the real womanizer is.

[IronLionZion]

29. Obama, McCain, and Romney campaign researchers all missed this somehow

If there was any speck of dirt on Obama or Biden anywhere, someone would have found it years ago

[uponit7771]

30. OK, this is ... Any M$M paying attention to this chick is tryin to grab headlines

[PatrickforO]

34. I care if she was assaulted, but based on all of the conflicting things I've read,

I'm thinking it might be transference in her own imagination of something her husband did to her to Biden. So much of the abuse in the marriage may be repressed memories.

But you are right about the timing. Why wait 27 years, and you know, as Maher said, if Biden had grabbed him 27 years ago he might save that for his memoirs for the sake of getting Trump out and having a decent government.

As Maher said, we must take accusations seriously, but must remember that if we have a knee-jerk reaction and 'always' believe anyone, then that makes us gullible, not noble.

[Major Nikon]

35. The classic red herring

She doesn’t know when, and she doesn’t know where it happened, but she knows what underwear she was wearing.

Another interesting aspect is why go to Megyn Fucking Kelly for an interview. The claims to be a die hard Democrat, yet picks a known GOP hack to do an interview. Sounds like someone is trying to avoid being thrown hardballs, and it’s not as if Megyn Fucking Kelly is going to follow up on any of the glaring contradictions.

[Laura PourMeADrink]

37. Wow, need to read all her stories. Heard no panty hose which

everyone who worked in DC at the time said, no way, we had to, everyone did.

Never heard about the crotchless underwear.

Lets just assume her story is true...I have never encountered a single female, in all my life who would admit to wearing crotchless underwear even if it was about their good boyfriend. Never.

If you were trying to be credible that this event occured, you would never add this detail unless you were trying to make your story sound more plausible.

[speaknow]

38. speaknow

The problem with Tara's story is Tara.
She said she voted for Obama twice but who was on his ticket as running
mate, Joe Biden both times. Now she say's she wont vote for Biden. Hay
Tara you did twice before.

[MFM008]

41. How convenient

I guess Biden knew that at the time...
Im sorry still dont believe her.

[Thekaspervote]

43. STOP!!! Please people...stop posting this! Every time it's posted it just puts it back out there!

You’re doing a lot more harm than good