Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Bucky

(54,068 posts)
5. We were never going to keep to the 60,000 mortality projection
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 10:41 PM
Apr 2020

Too many people are going out too early, not just the protesters.

But more importantly, the testing and even death certificates aren't catching all the covid-19 cases. Plus these models only account for this wave of the pandemic. Just about every epidemiologist is now saying we're going to see it back in the fall.

 

DanieRains

(4,619 posts)
2. 74,000 Will Be In 10 Days
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 10:39 PM
Apr 2020

No fat lady singing anywhere around here.

Just corpses as far as the eye can see.

jimfields33

(15,954 posts)
6. So far tonight we have zero deaths reported
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 10:41 PM
Apr 2020

That’s a first during all of this. Worldometer.com. I hope it continues..

Bucky

(54,068 posts)
10. That's because they count by Greenwich mean Time.
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 10:48 PM
Apr 2020

."Today" just started a couple of hours ago and they haven't posted their real time mortality count.

But April 27 by their reckoning is the second day in a row where deaths were back below 1500 a day, meaning the country as a whole has passed the apex of the curve.

April 27 (GMT)
23196 new cases and 1384 new deaths

Bucky

(54,068 posts)
15. From April 7 to April 25, 15 of 19 days saw 2000+ covid19 deaths
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 11:13 PM
Apr 2020

That was the peak. We should be on a natural decline roughly parallel to the ramp up from March 1 to April 16 (the middlepoint of the arc).

A rough estimate would double cases and deaths from that middle point. If that's correct then we will see just a hair below 70,000 deaths from a total of 1,360,000 cases. That's just a ballpark estimate, and leaves off unreported cases. The estimates I've heard for that is anywhere from 20% to 50% undercount of active covid-19 cases and a 5-15% undercount of deaths by the pandemic.

An epidemiology street survey study in New York came away with an estimated 15% of the state population and 21% of the city's population being positive for the coronavirus itself, regardless of symptom status, at the national peak day of the pandemic.

Of course it remains to be seen whether the protests and defiance actions beginning on Easter Sunday will extend or put a little bump in the decline.

Make7

(8,543 posts)
11. That is Covid-19 model from the University of Washington Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation.
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 10:49 PM
Apr 2020

That is the model they would be discussing on CNN.

Bucky

(54,068 posts)
16. I've been following the University of Washington study since February
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 11:18 PM
Apr 2020

Their numbers are pretty consistently on target, not low-balls

SoonerPride

(12,286 posts)
17. How do you figure that?
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 11:21 PM
Apr 2020

They predicted 60,000 dead by August 4th

We will have that before May 1st

Their model is crap

Bucky

(54,068 posts)
18. They adjusted their predictions upward. Now they're saying 74,000
Tue Apr 28, 2020, 12:44 AM
Apr 2020

My math was just based on the infection curve being symmetrical, which I understand to be the norm among pandemics. But by doing that, I came up with 70,000.

Their model is saying 74,000, so little bit bigger than my rougher estimate. Probably theirs is based on those states in more diffused locations having later apexes, in part a result of people resisting the quarantine orders.

Again, looks like they're making reasonable adjustments and predictions.

Near as I can see, they adjust their models based on new data coming in, like any scientist in the tricky business of making forecasts. The need to adjust the mortality rate upward is a measurement of the bad management of the outbreak crisis.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just heard on CNN Don Lem...