nytimes takes on romney: Murder in Benghazi
Libya and its pro-democracy revolution had no better friend than Chris Stevens, the United States ambassador who was killed along with three other Americans in Tuesday’s attack on the consulate in Benghazi. It was an outrageous act that deserved the strongest condemnation.
President Obama’s statement of outrage and his vow to bring the killers to justice received bipartisan support, including from politicians otherwise committed to partisan warfare, including House speaker John Boehner and Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell, who rarely misses a chance to attack Mr. Obama.
But not from Mitt Romney, who wants Americans to believe he can be president, but showed an extraordinary lack of presidential character by using the murders of the Americans in Libya as an excuse not just to attack Mr. Obama, but to do so in a way that suggested either a dangerous ignorance of the facts or an equally dangerous willingness to twist them to his narrow partisan aims.
Mr. Romney could easily have held his fire during this crisis, if he could not summon the decency to support the United States government. Instead, he misrepresented the administration as showing “sympathy” to the mob in Benghazi. There was no truth in what he said. In fact, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made the first official comment on the killings, a strong condemnation, just after Mr. Romney released his statement. Even after having a night to reconsider his response, Mr. Romney merely doubled down on his false charges, as he is prone to do.
more....http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/13/opinion/murder-in-benghazi.html?_r=1&hp&pagewanted=print
= new reply since forum marked as read
