General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums247 deaths from 19,000 cases is about the 1.3%, similar to yesterday's rate. But that is only where
they have tests, and are doing tests, plus where they're not testing, are they putting those deaths down to underlying illness. I fear that by the time the US gets serious about this, that death rate is going to go up significantly, most especially in Red states who are not taking this seriously at all.
Here in Ireland, we are into our second week of Social Distancing, and we won't know how well it's working until the 29th/30th.
March 1 - 1 confirmed
March 5 - 13 confirmed
March 11 - 43 confirmed, 1 death
March 14 - 129 confirmed, 2 deaths
March 19 - 557 confirmed, 3 deaths
March 20 - 683 confirmed, 3 deaths
jimfields33
(15,979 posts)I dont see a huge number of deaths at this point. Like for example we dont see evidence of 50 unknown deaths in any area of the country.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)See my post below.
There is a common mistake that people make when they figure that the incidence of fatal cases is simply the deaths divided by detected cases.
People dont drop dead on day one.
blitzen
(4,572 posts)evertonfc
(1,713 posts)I think Italy is an outlier for some reason. Hang in there. I was suppose to take my 18 year old to England for some soccer matches in October and we were going to stop in Ireland. Much love from Music City, USA
blitzen
(4,572 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Plus, we are about to go over the cliff of health care capacity.
evertonfc
(1,713 posts)So, until stats go up- and they may not it's 1.3.So, in other words, the vast majority won't die. Man, you gotta have some hope. Everyone is so doom and gloom.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)And thats not how math works.
Its like the guy jumping off a 100 story building and telling the people on the 50th floor that he feels fine so far.
Jumping off of a building is not fatal. Hitting the pavement a while after the jumping is what kills you.
Amishman
(5,559 posts)We have a lot of people who are still in the initial stage.
The death rate will go up. When China spiked, their death rate was at 2% and rose as the new wave progressed.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Its early to figure an overall percentage. Most cases havent resolved yet.
In other words your denominator - total cases - includes cases which have been detected but havent died yet. This illness doesnt resolve in a day.
To help visualize this, imagine I have 10 people who are determined to be sick today with a 100% fatal illness. Now, imagine that every day, for the next ten days, one of them dies. Saying, on day two, its 20% fatal is simply incorrect. On day five, by your method, it will be 50% fatal, and it will continue to be 10% more fatal each day.
So, of the total case figure you are using, its simply that many of them havent died yet.
OnDoutside
(19,974 posts)have been put out there. I'm 100% certain that both the number of infections, and the numbers of deaths, are way higher. I'm just using the official numbers, and all I'm saying is that even on those number, the rate is similar to yesterday. But I absolutely agree that the rate will change as this goes on, and I expect a higher increase in Red States than Blue States, though we may not see that officially if the Red States just are not testing.
csziggy
(34,138 posts)See sites like this one: https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6
Total confirmed cases: 287,239
Total deaths: 11,921
Total recovered: 89,899
That makes 101,820 cases that are resolved and leaves 185,419 cases that are still in limbo. Maybe some are positive but never got sick but I think there are a significant percentage that are still sick.
The part that worries me is the graph on the bottom right with the yellow line showing the growth of cases in "other locations." Even in the logarithmic version that line is still rising. In China it has flattened out, but not for the rest of world.
Strelnikov_
(7,772 posts)Exponential works both ways - exponential increase - exponential decrease - in rate of infection.
Nationwide the US has probably achieved a 50% reduction (or more) in transmission events. Forward looking states like IL, CA, NY, etc. that have closed up everything essential are probably at a 90% reduction or lower. A 75% reduction in possible transmission events by each individual yields a 94% reduction in infection rate for the 'herd'.
Thing is, extreme social distancing is just the first act, hold the line.
The second act, once infection rate is somewhat stabilized, is a hybrid S. Korea/China 'catch and kill' model. Use the testing bullets, along with good public health investigation, to identify, track and isolate carriers and those that are ill, rendering their R0 as close to 0 as possible.
Bottom line, I can foresee an emergency law requiring the name and address of anyone entering an event where uncontrolled airborne transmission (cough, etc. ) can occur (restaurants, church, etc.) to provide the public health aspect the ability to track and notify.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Give the incubation time, the lag between distancing and the effect will keep most people from thinking it is working.
People are pretty simpleminded and self-centered.
Strelnikov_
(7,772 posts)That is why we need leadership. Tell people to relax, take a break at home, we'll keep the food and booze coming in, and in four weeks we reboot, start Phase 2.