Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNYT Krugman "Step Aside for Powell and Pelosi"
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/16/opinion/pelosi-powell-coronavirus.htmlAmericas catastrophically inadequate response to the coronavirus can be attributed largely to bad short-term decisions by one man. And I do mean short-term: At every stage, Donald Trump minimized the threat and blocked helpful action because he wanted to look good for the next news cycle or two, ignoring and intimidating anyone who tried to give him good advice.
But heres the thing: Even if he werent so irresponsibly self-centered, he has denuded the government of people who could be giving good advice in the first place.
Trump disbanded the National Security Councils pandemic response team in 2018, although he now, with his characteristic refusal to accept responsibility for anything, says that he knew nothing about it. And he has in general staffed his administration with obsequious toadies who never tell him anything he doesnt want to hear.
Whats now becoming clear is that when it comes to dealing with the economic fallout from Covid-19, the situation may be even worse. There are still some competent professionals holding senior positions at federal health agencies, who could give Trump good advice if he were willing to listen. But serious economic thinking has effectively been banned from this administration, if not the whole Republican Party. As far as I can tell, the Trump team is utterly incapable of formulating a coherent response to the gathering economic crisis.
As a result, there are only two potential loci of intelligent economic policymaking left in Washington. One is the Federal Reserve; the other is the congressional Democratic leadership. At this point, in other words, its pretty much up to Jay Powell, the Fed chairman, and Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the House; the question is whether Trump and Senate Republicans will let them save the economy.
Powell, of course, slashed interest rates and announced a large asset-buying program on Sunday. He was right to do so. But its painfully obvious that these moves wont be sufficient, indeed will probably do little to stop the economys tailspin. Remember, in 2007-8 the Fed cut rates five times as much as it did Sunday, and it still wasnt able to prevent the worst slump since the Great Depression.
In fact, Powell himself basically acknowledged as much, declaring that he and his colleagues dont have the tools to reach those most in need of help, and that fiscal responses are critical.
Fiscal responses, of course, have to come from Congress. True, in another time, under another president, the White House would have played a crucial role in shaping crisis legislation. But last week, as the House drafted and then passed an economic relief bill one that was helpful, if still clearly inadequate it was almost entirely a Democratic effort. Democratic staff members put together the key elements of the bill paid sick leave for many (though not enough) workers, enhanced unemployment benefits, increased federal contributions for Medicaid and more.
True, Steve Mnuchin, the Treasury secretary, negotiated with Pelosi, basically to make the bill a bit worse. But Democrats set the shape of the bill, even as Trump was proposing the grandiose notion of a payroll tax holiday, which has been panned even by conservative economists.
As Greg Mankiw, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under George W. Bush, wrote, a payroll tax cut makes little sense in this circumstance, because it does nothing for those who cant work. President Trump should shut-the-hell-up.
And while the White House was basically out of the loop, Republican senators have been actively obstructionist, offering no serious proposals of their own but holding up a vote on the House bill, even though that bill passed with overwhelming bipartisan support.
Why are Republicans useless at best in the face of an economic crisis? As Ive pointed out before, there are many competent center-right economists, but the G.O.P. not just Trump, but the whole party doesnt want their advice. It prefers hacks and propagandists, the people Mankiw famously called charlatans and cranks, whose only idea is tax cuts. The party truly has nobody left who is capable of putting together a plausible economic rescue package.
The Senate probably will eventually pass Pelosis bill. But with all signs pointing to a steep economic dive, we need a much bigger stimulus package perhaps along the lines being developed by Chuck Schumer, the Senate minority leader as soon as possible. This package shouldnt include tax cuts; it should focus overwhelmingly on cash grants, perhaps a basic grant to every legal resident plus additional grants to those in special need.
And since theres nobody left in the G.O.P. who can put together a coherent stimulus plan, Democrats will have to do the job, perhaps with help from the Federal Reserve intervention to stabilize highly stressed financial markets.
I admit to being somewhat worried that Democrats wont go big enough. But my bigger worry is that Republicans will undermine their efforts. Its now up to Powell and Pelosi to rescue the economy, and Trump and company need to get out of their way.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2816 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (59)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT Krugman "Step Aside for Powell and Pelosi" (Original Post)
NRaleighLiberal
Mar 2020
OP
yardwork
(61,649 posts)1. I hope the voters are paying attention.
dweller
(23,641 posts)2. Krugman is correct here but for 1 thing
Last edited Mon Mar 16, 2020, 11:09 PM - Edit history (1)
THIS IS A HEALTH CRISIS 1st and foremost ...
slap bandaids on the economy, but get ready for the potential
mass die off, and the misery that follows ...
i pray it will not occur, and fear it is inevitable
ah hell ..
i came here to delete my post but saw this 1st, so never mind ...
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100213108006
😣
✌🏼
Thunderbeast
(3,417 posts)3. Two step economic program
Step ONE: Implement an immediate one percent wealth tax on securities portfios and investment metals in excess of ten million dollars regardless of where held.
STEP TWO; Distribute $1,000 checks monthly to every adult over 18 and $500 for each child.
Get cash directly back into the hands of consumers...NOW!
We can do this without adding to the debt.
rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)4. No. Putting $1000 checks into it is not the answer.