Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
Fri Mar 13, 2020, 05:38 PM Mar 2020

This makes it sound like a far far FAR less developed project than the president sold at the presser





This makes it sound like a far far FAR less developed project than the president sold at the presser.


Google Communications
@Google_Comms
· 21m
Statement from Verily: "We are developing a tool to help triage individuals for Covid-19 testing. Verily is in the early stages of development, and planning to roll testing out in the Bay Area, with the hope of expanding more broadly over time




Trump said during his presser that the Google triage website would be up for everybody by Sunday.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This makes it sound like a far far FAR less developed project than the president sold at the presser (Original Post) octoberlib Mar 2020 OP
Triaging testing Midnightwalk Mar 2020 #1
He said the Google website would be up by Sunday but sounds like Google just started on it. octoberlib Mar 2020 #4
Which is bad enough Midnightwalk Mar 2020 #5
Without unfettered testing we're fucked! We don't know who has the virus uponit7771 Mar 2020 #2
For Trump, the important thing Turbineguy Mar 2020 #3

Midnightwalk

(3,131 posts)
1. Triaging testing
Fri Mar 13, 2020, 05:42 PM
Mar 2020

Sounds like how to cope while we don’t have enough testing capability.

It might be what is needed until we have enough testing capacity but should i treat those words as an admission that we don’t have sufficient capacity?

Midnightwalk

(3,131 posts)
5. Which is bad enough
Fri Mar 13, 2020, 06:21 PM
Mar 2020

What I’m trying to say is why do we need to triage tests? Because we can’t do enough so there needs to be prioritization (triage).

It might be the best we can do now, but it seems to be an admission that there won’t be enough tests soon. Otherwise we’d just do the tests wouldn’t we?

Just in case, I’m not criticizing anything you’ve said. Just adding that triaging testing is not a substitute for having enough tests.

Turbineguy

(37,367 posts)
3. For Trump, the important thing
Fri Mar 13, 2020, 05:55 PM
Mar 2020

is that nobody ever finds out how bad this really is (and it may not be all that bad in the end, if we get lucky). Hence, testing but no coordinated record keeping. Years from now, RWNJ websites can claim that the only people who died were in states runs by democrat governors and we all know what democrats are like.

Or we can play "nobody really knows but" range estimates are like this: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/2009-h1n1-pandemic.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This makes it sound like ...