Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMissouri book ban could jail librarians for loaning 'inappropriate' content
Librarians and free speech advocates are fighting back against a proposal in the Missouri House of Representatives that would ban certain books from the state's libraries with the threat of a misdemeanor charge.
Missouri House Rep. Ben Baker introduced the bill, dubbed the "Parental Oversight of Public Libraries Act," in January that calls for the creation of a panel made up of non-library workers who will determine the removal of "age-inappropriate sexual material," from their local branch.
Libraries that don't comply will lose their funding. Library employees providing material deemed inappropriate would be hit with a misdemeanor charge and liable for a $500 fine or a maximum jail sentence of a year, according to the bill's current language.
Cynthia Dudenhoffer, the president of the Missouri Library Association, said she was shocked when she first heard about the bill and said it was unnecessary. Each of the state's library systems, which account for a total of 365 branches, already have their own protocols in place to determine which materials are allowed for their younger members.
"Librarians take that stuff very seriously," she said to ABC News. "It's not like we buy things willy-nilly."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/missouri-book-ban-could-jail-librarians-for-loaning-inappropriate-content/ar-BBZwsII?li=BBnbfcL
Missouri House Rep. Ben Baker introduced the bill, dubbed the "Parental Oversight of Public Libraries Act," in January that calls for the creation of a panel made up of non-library workers who will determine the removal of "age-inappropriate sexual material," from their local branch.
Libraries that don't comply will lose their funding. Library employees providing material deemed inappropriate would be hit with a misdemeanor charge and liable for a $500 fine or a maximum jail sentence of a year, according to the bill's current language.
Cynthia Dudenhoffer, the president of the Missouri Library Association, said she was shocked when she first heard about the bill and said it was unnecessary. Each of the state's library systems, which account for a total of 365 branches, already have their own protocols in place to determine which materials are allowed for their younger members.
"Librarians take that stuff very seriously," she said to ABC News. "It's not like we buy things willy-nilly."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/missouri-book-ban-could-jail-librarians-for-loaning-inappropriate-content/ar-BBZwsII?li=BBnbfcL
So non librarians would get to decide what goes into libraries? What could possibly go wrong?
Also, they really need to get over Drag Queen Story Hour. The real people who are "triggered" here, aren't the drag queens.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 524 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Missouri book ban could jail librarians for loaning 'inappropriate' content (Original Post)
Initech
Jan 2020
OP
dchill
(38,502 posts)1. "Parental Oversight of Public Libraries Act,"
POOPLA.
dchill
(38,502 posts)3. I know! And they titled it all by themselves!
Bless their hearts.
Initech
(100,079 posts)5. Well hey it's right there!
dchill
(38,502 posts)7. Sounds like a Nintendo game from the 80s.
Different Drummer
(7,617 posts)6. Perfect!
SWBTATTReg
(22,130 posts)4. If this law is enacted, it will be ruled unconstitutional as something against free speech or ...
such...only in MO, eh?
msongs
(67,413 posts)8. christian taliban strikes again nt
Initech
(100,079 posts)9. Another independent thought, that's bad for the cult.