Every repuke that votes against witnesses and acquits tRump, I have this to say to you...

[cynatnite]

A Dem will take the WH at some point whether it's 2020 or later down the road.

If that president withholds foreign aid despite congressional approval, you have no right to protest that. The same goes for any time that president uses his office to benefit himself. If that president gets a "yes man" to shield him as Barr has for tRump, you have to keep quiet. If that president wants to befriend dictators, expose classified information or retaliate against his political opponents to save his own ass, then you still can't speak out.

You lost that right with your complicit and cowardly behavior during this sham of a trial.

That's all.

[lame54]

1. Right - their goldfish memories won't stop them

[InAbLuEsTaTe]

2. You forgot one thing to say to the RepukeliKKKons... fuck off!!

[live2011]

3. Proposed Republican name change.

IMO, the Republican Party should change its name to “The Faith-Based Party [the Evangelicals would love that, wouldn’t they?]. They so believe in Donald Trump they don’t need to hear from any witnesses or look at any evidence [sound familiar?]. In some ways it reminds me of what the USA used to say about the dictators we supported, “Yes he’s an SOB, but he’s OUR SOB”.

[Different Drummer]

4. I regret that I have but one rec to give this post.

Kick!

[SWBTATTReg]

5. Or, if that president hires one of his/her crony friends, you have no right to say one word...

if that president issues a fraudulent executive order and his/her DOJ defends it anyway in Court, you have no right to say one way (such as severely limiting money in our elections...why not?).

[EndlessWire]

6. I agree. n/t