Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRahm Emanuel: How Impeachment Could Flip the Senate
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/01/29/rahm-emanuel-oped-impeachment-senate/But if the scandal is working to preserve the Democratic tilt in the House, it could upend things in the Senate, where Republicans hold a three-seat margin. Impeachment will likely decide the fate of a handful of Senate Republicans currently in cycle. For Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Thom Tillis (N.C.), Joni Ernst (Iowa), Cory Gardner (Colo.) and Martha McSally (Ariz.), a vote to convict is unthinkable: It risks the presidents wrath and a likely primary challenge. That combination would force each senator to embrace an agenda alien to most swing voters.
Impeachment trial live updates
A vote to acquit, however, will force every senator to own Trumps emboldened rhetoric of being exonerated. Which means theyll have to defend Trump when the next embarrassing audio recording hits the airwaves, or when another witness surfaces to speak, or when John Boltons book comes out, or when internal memos about the drug deal come out via the Freedom of Information Act. Republican senators will become full-time exonerators.
That dilemma is now playing out in real time. Some 63 percent of voters in Arizona, Colorado, Maine and North Carolina look unfavorably on the Senates decision to date to disallow witnesses and hide documents yet all five senators mentioned earlier have, so far, voted against transparency. That may partly explain why the five Republican senators are underwater, meaning that more constituents view them negatively than positively. And if that snapshot bodes poorly, the trend lines are worse: In the last quarter of 2019, McSally and Collins saw 5- and 4-point drops, respectively, in their net approval rating an indication that a rising share of their constituents view them in a negative light.
For years, Ive believed that the balance of the Senate almost invariably followed the outcome of a presidential election. This coming year, by contrast, the Trump impeachment may have such inertial power that the old truism of nationalized results during presidential cycles may no longer be valid. If so, the current trial, if you can call it that, will decouple the battles for the White House and the worlds greatest deliberative body.
Impeachment trial live updates
A vote to acquit, however, will force every senator to own Trumps emboldened rhetoric of being exonerated. Which means theyll have to defend Trump when the next embarrassing audio recording hits the airwaves, or when another witness surfaces to speak, or when John Boltons book comes out, or when internal memos about the drug deal come out via the Freedom of Information Act. Republican senators will become full-time exonerators.
That dilemma is now playing out in real time. Some 63 percent of voters in Arizona, Colorado, Maine and North Carolina look unfavorably on the Senates decision to date to disallow witnesses and hide documents yet all five senators mentioned earlier have, so far, voted against transparency. That may partly explain why the five Republican senators are underwater, meaning that more constituents view them negatively than positively. And if that snapshot bodes poorly, the trend lines are worse: In the last quarter of 2019, McSally and Collins saw 5- and 4-point drops, respectively, in their net approval rating an indication that a rising share of their constituents view them in a negative light.
For years, Ive believed that the balance of the Senate almost invariably followed the outcome of a presidential election. This coming year, by contrast, the Trump impeachment may have such inertial power that the old truism of nationalized results during presidential cycles may no longer be valid. If so, the current trial, if you can call it that, will decouple the battles for the White House and the worlds greatest deliberative body.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 865 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rahm Emanuel: How Impeachment Could Flip the Senate (Original Post)
pnwmom
Jan 2020
OP
Zolorp
(1,115 posts)1. His article assumes free elections.
I do not believe that will ever be a given any longer in this nation.
Johnny2X2X
(19,066 posts)3. The entire federal government now exists for only 1 reason
To keep Republicans in power.
Nikki28
(557 posts)2. I agree with you
I see so much deceit with the Trump party involved with Russia and they are acting like fools because they have already took all year to make time for Russia to rig the systems. The tell would be if the Dem again as Mitch to go to paper ballets and his response. I feel if we don't go to paper ballet, we will lose all three branches and will be lost forever.
Before Trump was elected, these people knew USA's values.Now they are all in the pocket of Putin and this explains their attitude and no care for the law. I think we are already in trouble when it comes to our democracy.
struggle4progress
(118,290 posts)4. Jarama