Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TheBlackAdder

(28,205 posts)
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 08:41 PM Jan 2020

She 'knows how to leverage power': Internet cracks up at 'fastball' Elizabeth Warren pitched Roberts

.

Senator Warren dropped a question right on Chief Justice Robert's lap.


Elie Mystal
@ElieNYC
·
1h
dsjfklasdfa;sfdjlasdlk

@ewarren 's question is, uhh, basically: Doesn't the Chief Justice's refusal to force the Republicans to stop lying reflect poorly on the chief justice.

Roberts had to read it. Lolol.

Also, he's SO nuking Medicare for All.


Bigly Nasty
@GeeJustG
Replying to @ElieNYC and @ewarren
Damn, the look on his face after he read it!







🕷
Dante Atkins
@DanteAtkins
Warren knows how to leverage power. She knows that Roberts cares most about his legacy as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. And she is laying down a marker that this trial will define him. Brilliant.

Quote Tweet
Andrea Mitchell
@mitchellreports
· 1h
.@ewarren tosses a verbal grenade into #ImpeachmentTrial by submitting question for #ChiefJusticeRoberts to read out loud: does trial presided over by Chief Justice without witnesses further undermine public confidence in institutions like the Supreme Courts (awkward)





https://www.rawstory.com/2020/01/she-knows-how-to-leverage-power-internet-cracks-up-at-fastball-elizabeth-warren-pitched-roberts-on-his-reputation/


Wow!

.
77 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
She 'knows how to leverage power': Internet cracks up at 'fastball' Elizabeth Warren pitched Roberts (Original Post) TheBlackAdder Jan 2020 OP
Good for her! 50 Shades Of Blue Jan 2020 #1
Elizabeth Warren FTW. chia Jan 2020 #2
sounds like she is staying awake for the trial lol nt msongs Jan 2020 #3
Unlike somebody, who won't be named. nt Blue_true Jan 2020 #10
It was brilliant malaise Jan 2020 #4
Oh, that was where he said it wasn't CJ's fault, but his party's fault? TheBlackAdder Jan 2020 #6
Yep malaise Jan 2020 #8
Schiff is proving that the US Senate is no longer the world's greatest deliberative body. TheBlackAdder Jan 2020 #9
We were talking about that on our walk this morning malaise Jan 2020 #11
We don't yet know Tweedy Jan 2020 #43
Dream on, Tweedy. The republicans have been financed by the russians, and they're Scotch-Irish Jan 2020 #52
Russiapublicans believe that Putin will save them from the fury of the American electorate. lagomorph777 Jan 2020 #64
Thanks Tweedy, saidsimplesimon Jan 2020 #65
They're the world's greatest deliverative body. ancianita Jan 2020 #23
✔️ blm Jan 2020 #29
I think that there are some senators who want to be open-minded, but no (r)epuglicons erronis Jan 2020 #26
I missed that. pangaia Jan 2020 #32
Absolutely Tweedy Jan 2020 #45
I'm leaning towards her. Hassler Jan 2020 #5
I love my Senator! sheshe2 Jan 2020 #7
EW FTW! progressoid Jan 2020 #12
I LOVE it. Glimmer of Hope Jan 2020 #13
BAM! democrank Jan 2020 #14
Keep going, EWAR! B Stieg Jan 2020 #15
Question to Presidents team: when did you stop beating your dog? C_U_L8R Jan 2020 #16
it was beautiful. Kurt V. Jan 2020 #17
Is it just me or did Chief Justice look watery eyed as he finished reading the question MLAA Jan 2020 #18
It looked like he was giving someone the stink-eye afterwards. Talitha Jan 2020 #19
Yes, she is. I'll bet she locked eyes with him too and won the staredown! PandoraAwakened Jan 2020 #40
It's certainly ballsy Polybius Jan 2020 #55
Warren has been a favorite of mine because she is so well prepared, erlewyne Jan 2020 #20
Way to lay on the line, EW. Good job! nt crickets Jan 2020 #21
Liz showed her stuff! (nt) ehrnst Jan 2020 #22
Well, it was about time SOMEbody said it Leith Jan 2020 #24
It's a good question Ohioboy Jan 2020 #25
The truth hurts. paleotn Jan 2020 #27
It's a question that Roberts should have already asked himself several times now Ohioboy Jan 2020 #28
Excuse me while I pick myself up off the floor. Haggis for Breakfast Jan 2020 #30
Not a hammer, a grenade! lastlib Jan 2020 #35
No, it was a hammer HuskyOffset Jan 2020 #56
Magnificent. emmaverybo Jan 2020 #31
Love her!! BlancheSplanchnik Jan 2020 #33
I didn't hear anything about lying in the question. SergeStorms Jan 2020 #34
he looked like he wanted to vomit EveHammond13 Jan 2020 #36
Wow. That was quite the tight-lipped expression at the end there gristy Jan 2020 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author LudwigPastorius Jan 2020 #38
LOVE IT!! Ferrets are Cool Jan 2020 #39
Kudos, Liz! Kitchari Jan 2020 #41
Link not working. Tons of words, but not what she actually said? Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2020 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author geralmar Jan 2020 #44
No Tweedy Jan 2020 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author geralmar Jan 2020 #49
😂 Tweedy Jan 2020 #50
I agree, we're alone on this in here it seems Polybius Jan 2020 #53
Roberts didn't get pissed, because he knew the question nailed it. WyattKansas Jan 2020 #67
Holy shit Liz! jcgoldie Jan 2020 #47
Ouch!!! calimary Jan 2020 #48
Why do you keep punching yourself in the face, Justice Roberts? flibbitygiblets Jan 2020 #51
Thankfully, this didn't backfire Polybius Jan 2020 #54
She's just publicly reminding Roberts... LudwigPastorius Jan 2020 #57
I've always been a Bernie guy, but I just love Warren's toughness and intelligence mvd Jan 2020 #58
Thank you Elizabeth! SunSeeker Jan 2020 #59
"Nevertheless, She Persisted." .. Always Randy Jan 2020 #60
It was the final nail in the coffin of his legacy RVN VET71 Jan 2020 #61
Good question. How did he answer it? Nitram Jan 2020 #62
It wasn't addressed to him, but to the House Managers. soldierant Jan 2020 #71
I'm not sure the Chief Justice couldn't play a more important role if he chose to do so. Nitram Feb 2020 #73
He probably could, except that soldierant Feb 2020 #74
Exactly! At least he'd be on record upholding the Constitution. Nitram Feb 2020 #75
Will he actually read it out loud? lagomorph777 Jan 2020 #63
He did. There's video. soldierant Jan 2020 #72
Awwwwesome! lagomorph777 Feb 2020 #77
WOW. coti Jan 2020 #66
And it really does. Where's the impartiality? Where's the sane voice saying stop, don't do this? SWBTATTReg Jan 2020 #68
Loved this! Rider3 Jan 2020 #69
Geraldoed. Kid Berwyn Jan 2020 #70
you go gal!!! riversedge Feb 2020 #76

malaise

(269,022 posts)
11. We were talking about that on our walk this morning
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 09:03 PM
Jan 2020

That and their complete contempt for both the Constitution and the rule of law.

Tweedy

(628 posts)
43. We don't yet know
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 11:13 PM
Jan 2020

All of the president's lying, incompetent lawyers clearly have no respect for any part of truth, justice and the American way. The rot clearly comes down from their boss.

A few Senators have behaved unbelievably badly (looking at you Senators Paul and Blackburn). A few have been boors, nincompoops and hypocrites (ahem, Senators Ernst, Cruz, Cronyn and Barrasso).

Senators McSally and Loeffler have gone full Jim Jordon. Senator Gardner is hiding in a closet

& assuredly if John McCain's spirit is restless, he is haunting Senator Graham

Yet, the Senate as a whole has not spoken definitively yet. Still living in hope that this great experiment we call America is lodged in enough GOP heads that we get a fair trial.

It truly is the very least we can ask.

 

Scotch-Irish

(464 posts)
52. Dream on, Tweedy. The republicans have been financed by the russians, and they're
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 11:53 PM
Jan 2020

convinced the money will buy them love.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
64. Russiapublicans believe that Putin will save them from the fury of the American electorate.
Fri Jan 31, 2020, 12:59 PM
Jan 2020

Boy are they fucking wrong.

erronis

(15,286 posts)
26. I think that there are some senators who want to be open-minded, but no (r)epuglicons
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 09:43 PM
Jan 2020

the response title didn't leave me room to call out one of the worst snakes, Rand Paul (snake).

Tweedy

(628 posts)
45. Absolutely
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 11:16 PM
Jan 2020

Senator Warren showed him the fat ball
& Representative Schiff hit it out of the ballpark!

MLAA

(17,296 posts)
18. Is it just me or did Chief Justice look watery eyed as he finished reading the question
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 09:29 PM
Jan 2020

He looked sad rather than republican angry

Talitha

(6,593 posts)
19. It looked like he was giving someone the stink-eye afterwards.
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 09:30 PM
Jan 2020

Is Senator Warren sitting in that direction?

PandoraAwakened

(905 posts)
40. Yes, she is. I'll bet she locked eyes with him too and won the staredown!
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 11:04 PM
Jan 2020

The look on his face as he read the question was, indeed, priceless!

You go, girl!!

Polybius

(15,423 posts)
55. It's certainly ballsy
Fri Jan 31, 2020, 12:02 AM
Jan 2020

Can Roberts throw someone out for disrespect like any judge can in a regular courtroom?

erlewyne

(1,115 posts)
20. Warren has been a favorite of mine because she is so well prepared,
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 09:31 PM
Jan 2020

Tonight I caught Klobuchar with Ari Melber and she so impressed me.
And I like Bernie. Warren is now on the same level. I have no idea who I
am going to vote for. I can't vote until March. In November I am not voting
G.O.P.

If Bernie keeps the momentum I like it.

I like Klobucher, she thinks like I do.

Warren really scored today!

Ohioboy

(3,243 posts)
28. It's a question that Roberts should have already asked himself several times now
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 09:45 PM
Jan 2020

He should be feeling shame if he hasn't.

Haggis for Breakfast

(6,831 posts)
30. Excuse me while I pick myself up off the floor.
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 09:47 PM
Jan 2020
GODDAM.

She didn't "drop a question," she dropped the hammer !!

And the look on his face will be frozen forever in video.

DAMN !!!!!

lastlib

(23,239 posts)
35. Not a hammer, a grenade!
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 10:27 PM
Jan 2020

And CJ Roberts, at the end of his reading, thought, "DAMN, I gotta throw myself on THAT???"

--- ---

LOVE it when the RW basturds get to feel the burn!

SergeStorms

(19,201 posts)
34. I didn't hear anything about lying in the question.
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 10:24 PM
Jan 2020

Just to be clear, there was no question about republican lying, just republicans' refusal to allow witnesses, and the CJ's presiding over a (pretty much) kangaroo court. Of course the republicans are lying constantly, but that wasn't part of her question.

That being said, hooray for Senator Warren's question as written!

gristy

(10,667 posts)
37. Wow. That was quite the tight-lipped expression at the end there
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 10:47 PM
Jan 2020

And coupled with eyes focusing in the distance it looks like. That is, not on anything in the room.

Response to TheBlackAdder (Original post)

Response to TheBlackAdder (Original post)

Tweedy

(628 posts)
46. No
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 11:19 PM
Jan 2020

The Chief Justice rightly refused to read a question from Senator Paul that purported to out the whistleblower, here.

Response to Tweedy (Reply #46)

WyattKansas

(1,648 posts)
67. Roberts didn't get pissed, because he knew the question nailed it.
Fri Jan 31, 2020, 01:56 PM
Jan 2020

Even for him, it must be appalling for him to sit there and listen to the complete bullshit tRUMP's lawyers and republicans keep whining about. After all, even the republicans all know that tRUMP is a despicable tyrant and cannot be trusted.

Polybius

(15,423 posts)
54. Thankfully, this didn't backfire
Fri Jan 31, 2020, 12:00 AM
Jan 2020

He could have gotten mad and thrown her out, but thankfully he didn't. I personally believe that you get more flies with honey than vinegar.

LudwigPastorius

(9,150 posts)
57. She's just publicly reminding Roberts...
Fri Jan 31, 2020, 12:36 AM
Jan 2020

that his legacy hangs in the balance should he be needed to cast the tie-breaking vote on whether to hear from witnesses.

Somebody had to do it, and it further enforced my view that Elizabeth Warren deserves to be the Democratic nominee for president.

mvd

(65,174 posts)
58. I've always been a Bernie guy, but I just love Warren's toughness and intelligence
Fri Jan 31, 2020, 12:42 AM
Jan 2020

I wasn’t surprised at all that the question was from her.

RVN VET71

(2,691 posts)
61. It was the final nail in the coffin of his legacy
Fri Jan 31, 2020, 09:34 AM
Jan 2020

Warren understood that she was not going to move Roberts to righteous action by having him ask the question. Roberts is a tool of the RW, plain and simple. That's Ms Warren's message to him. She's letting him know that his legacy as a jurist, as a Chief Justice, as a man, has been sealed forever by his obvious refusal to take action against the Republican kangaroos.

No one in either party at this point doubts the outcome of the trial McConnell has rigged. Roberts had an opportunity to stand up for justice and the rule of law. He chose instead to act the role of a passive note reader, a substitute teacher afraid to react to the misbehavior of the Republican half of the class as they and their defense counsel throw spit balls at the Democrats.

soldierant

(6,880 posts)
71. It wasn't addressed to him, but to the House Managers.
Fri Jan 31, 2020, 07:44 PM
Jan 2020

Adam Schiff answered it and basically said (I paraphrase - don't accuse me of making it up - oh, wait, no Trumps here, never mind) "Don't blame the Chief Justice, it's not his fault that the Senate Republicans are corrupt to the core."

(Although it is partly the Chief Justice's fault, due to decisions like Citizens United and the VRA and partisan gerrymandering - but Schiff probably also catches more flies with hone than with vinegar.)

Nitram

(22,803 posts)
73. I'm not sure the Chief Justice couldn't play a more important role if he chose to do so.
Sat Feb 1, 2020, 12:56 AM
Feb 2020

He's not even trying to be an umpire calling balls and strikes.

soldierant

(6,880 posts)
74. He probably could, except that
Sat Feb 1, 2020, 08:03 PM
Feb 2020

anything he says or orders, the Senate can overrule with a simple majority vote.

I'd love to see him try harder anyway. I'd love for some of those brazen votes against him to go on record.

SWBTATTReg

(22,130 posts)
68. And it really does. Where's the impartiality? Where's the sane voice saying stop, don't do this?
Fri Jan 31, 2020, 03:04 PM
Jan 2020

No voice of reason, nothing. How pathetic. I've lost a lot of respect for the 'rule of law' now, being that it's being so flagrantly violated and flaunted. As an American (as we all are mostly), this is disgusting and 'unAmerican'.

Rider3

(919 posts)
69. Loved this!
Fri Jan 31, 2020, 03:33 PM
Jan 2020

She's reminding him of the legacy he'll be leaving for himself AND the Supreme Court. If nothing else happens, I hope this haunts Roberts for the rest of his life.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»She 'knows how to leverag...