Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

chowder66

(9,074 posts)
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 06:59 PM Jan 2020

DIANNE FEINSTEIN CLARIFICATIONS


?


I think the
@latimes
has this story backwards. I was the reporter who asked
@SenFeinstein
these questions. She told me she was initially going to vote against impeachment "before this"

But when I asked her to clarify, she said she's changed her opinion






The LA Times misunderstood what I said today. Before the trial I said I'd keep an open mind. Now that both sides made their cases, it’s clear the president’s actions were wrong. He withheld vital foreign assistance for personal political gain. That can’t be allowed to stand.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DIANNE FEINSTEIN CLARIFICATIONS (Original Post) chowder66 Jan 2020 OP
thanks for the update.......... Takket Jan 2020 #1
That's largely what she said going into the hearings this morning. Miles Archer Jan 2020 #2
K&R Mersky Jan 2020 #3
Already heard from one of the reporters that they are working on updating question everything Jan 2020 #4
The words "link to tweet" is not a clarification - copy and paste fer crying out loud. nt Kashkakat v.2.0 Jan 2020 #5
I am NOT going to click on or in any way support a useless business that is enabling and serving as Kashkakat v.2.0 Jan 2020 #6
Done. nt chowder66 Jan 2020 #7

Takket

(21,609 posts)
1. thanks for the update..........
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 07:04 PM
Jan 2020

between half the media being right wing propagandists and the other half being incompetent buffoons, it is impossible to know what to believe anymore.

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
2. That's largely what she said going into the hearings this morning.
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 07:04 PM
Jan 2020

She did not say she was going to vote in favor of acquittal.

She said that this is serious business and wanted to hear everything.

BIG difference.

Kashkakat v.2.0

(1,752 posts)
6. I am NOT going to click on or in any way support a useless business that is enabling and serving as
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 07:09 PM
Jan 2020

propaganda arm of the drumpfenhurher.

Why anyone would want to is beyond me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DIANNE FEINSTEIN CLARIFIC...