General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMedicare for All 'Is What Patients Need'
Medicare for All 'Is What Patients Need': New Harvard Study Shows Even Those With Private Insurance Can't Afford Care
From the article:
That's a central finding of a new study by Harvard University researchers published Monday in the peer-reviewed journal JAMA Internal Medicine, examining 20 years of government data between 1998 and 2017.
The study found that despite a major expansion of insurance coverage in the U.S. during that periodmost significantly through the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA)"most measures of unmet need for physician services have shown no improvement, and financial access to physician services has decreased." The study's authors noted that the rise of "narrow networks, high-deductible plans, and higher co-pays" has contributed to the growth of unmet medical needs in the U.S. since the 1990s.
To read more:
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/01/27/medicare-all-what-patients-need-new-harvard-study-shows-even-those-private-insurance?cd-origin=rss&utm_term=AO&utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter&utm_content=email&utm_source=Daily%20Newsletter&utm_medium=Email
The ACA was an improvement over what existed prior to its implementation, but the actual solution is a single payer system.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)concluded. CDreams has a bad habit of that.
If less than 20% of population cant afford care (which is what article essentially says), voters dont seem sure about MFA, and Congress is not likely to enact MFA, maybe subsidies that do a better job of insuring that 20% would be a better approach short-term, rather than failing again to improve healthcare coverage.
Longer term, major changes are definitely necessary. Hopefully, Congress will change, so thats possible.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)And 20% of 325 million is 65 million people.
Those subsidies are the equivalent of bandages on a bleeding wound.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)of study. Not blaming you, just CommonDreams.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)One frequent poster here called out one headline I posted that had what I felt was an obvious grammatical error. I left the error in.
Now, if there are spelling and/or grammatical errors, I either note them with (sic), or I correct them and avoid the wrath of teachers.