General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm trying to follow what Starr is saying. Not connecting with me.
My mind goes blank. It wanders.
EarlG
(21,966 posts)and nothing to say.
Ilsa
(61,698 posts)#coverup * football ** cough *rape
Watchfoxheadexplodes
(3,496 posts)Bloviating Collins and crazy goober gohmert.
CrispyQ
(36,509 posts)calimary
(81,459 posts)Gasping for breath after every phrase. Painful. Wonder what kinds of heart meds hes on?
dchill
(38,532 posts)I think.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)He keeps droning on about how impeachment is more about time than high crimes.
I would argue that impeachment should be invoked when it is appropriate, like when a president is abusing his office and committing a high crime such as asking a foreign power to intervene in an election. Indeed, the house would be derelict in its duty if it did not act as a check on a president who is out of control and destroying our government.
So it's not the number of impeachments over a period of time. Each impeachment should be looked at individually, since there isn't a cadence of high crimes that must be reached in order to broach impeachment. It's ridiculous to think that a president could abuse his office, get impeached, and then get followed by an even more destructive president who is somehow immune to impeachment because his predecessor was impeached.
Watchfoxheadexplodes
(3,496 posts)That's where he's going.
catbyte
(34,447 posts)EndlessWire
(6,565 posts)I don't like his purple tie.
My TV is cutting in and out, and it doesn't seem to make any difference in his monologue.
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)He was boring and rambling.